similar to: update

Hello, I have been running Shorewall for quite some time at an ISP client of mine to protect his LAN. We have just upgraded to 2.2.4 and he now wants to put his servers in a DMZ. The servers have public IPs in two classes xxx.xxx.79.0 and xxx.xxx.242.0. The public IP on the router for each class is xxx.xxx.79.126 and xxx.xxx.242.126. I am using masq and 192.168.1.0 on eth0 LAN I have tried

Hi i want see if my QoS are good because i am not very sure ... the VoIP quality are not very good when i download. I have on my Linux routeur/Firewall Asterisk .. and i have into my config : ================================================ tcdevices: eth0 2000kbit 2000kbit tcclasses: eth0 1 100kbit 180kbit 1 tos=0x68/0xfc,tos=0xb8/0xfc eth0 2 full/4 full

Hi I try to connect my asterisk with a Siemens Hicom pbx. I have a PCI cologne Chip card wich support NT mode. I have compiled mISDN driver, and I use chn_misdn from debian package. The card wotk fine in TE mode but mot in NT mode. for informations : routeur*CLI> misdn show stacks BEGIN STACK_LIST: * Stack Addr: Uid 40200001 Port 1 Type NT Prot. PMP Link DOWN --> bchan: addr 0 channel

Hi folks, I know this isn''t a shorewall question, but i''m hoping someone can point me to the right place to look for answers on this (since, as Tom suggests, search engines are useless for some things): Here is my firewall setup: ADSL1 ADSL2 dialup \ | / firewall | DMZ It''s a fairly simple setup. ADSL1 has a static IP, ADSL2 is

I have some hosts in a DMZ zone with proxyarp. In my local zone I have a host to which I DNAT. I have discovered that I can reach the host in the local zone by attempting to connect to the fw (As expected) or ANY proxyarped host in my dmz zone (as not expected). Is this normal ? (I''ve just discovered that actually the dnated host answers to requests sent to any IP routed to my host!)

Hello all, I have been putting together a shorewall firewall together for a couple of days, but have hit a bit of a dead end. I am using Shorewall 3.0.5 Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities: NAT: Available Packet Mangling: Available Multi-port Match: Available Extended Multi-port Match: Available Connection Tracking Match: Available Packet Type

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Shorewall-3.0.3 RH9 (+legacy updates) eth0: loc: 192.168.1.0/24 eth0:0: loc: 192.168.20.0/24 eth1:: 69.70.32.8/29 I''m worked all day on an issue I found today and I just can''t find a way to fix my problem. So, basically, for now, my network looks like this: Internet ^ | (69.70.32.8/29) Firewall 192.168.1.1

I''ve made some tests... eth2 is my internal interface, LAN is connected here. Before I had IMQ device in AB mode... PREROUTING [A]fter NAT, POSTROUTING [B]efore NAT. I want the same situation on ifb. I do this in this way: --- # incoming traffic here from LAN is before NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle ffff: ingress # outcoming traffic here from WAN is after NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2

FATNA FATTACH 23 ANS Hay El FALAH RUE 1 N?56 RESIDENCE BEN AMOUR 2 ETAGE 2 Casablanca 0653185512 E-mail : jalilafattach at hotmail . Fr. TECHNICIEN SPECIALISE EN RESEAUX INFORMATIQUE ETUDES ET FORMATION : -2013-2014 : Dipl?me en technicien sp?cialis? en r?seaux informatiques. -Niveau d?instruction : Bac science de la vie

Hello Tom and all, Quick question: Is it possible to operate an OpenVPN server from behind a firewall? Is it as simple as setting it up and placing: DNAT net loc:192.168.10.20 udp 5000 - ipaddress -- Paul Slinski -o) Network Administrator /\ Global IQX, Inc. _\_v Global IQX is the leader in integrated e-business automation solutions for the group life and health insurance

Dear All, I am in a trouble with reading data. It is in txt file looking like this. 0.00632 18.00 2.310 0 0.5380 6.5750 65.20 4.0900 1 296.0 15.30 396.90 4.98 24.00 0.02731 0.00 7.070 0 0.4690 6.4210 78.90 4.9671 2 242.0 17.80 396.90 9.14 21.60 0.02729 0.00 7.070 0 0.4690 7.1850 61.10 4.9671 2 242.0 17.80 392.83 4.03 34.70 0.03237 0.00

Hello, About the INBOX location when using maildir, in the wiki, http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir, I can read: " Directory Structure ~/Maildir/new, ~/Maildir/cur and ~/Maildir/tmp directories contain the messages for INBOX. The tmp directory is used during delivery, new messages arrive in new and read shall be moved to cur by the clients. " But in my Maildir, I see

Hi Step 1: I create a data.frame called iolm. Step 2: I create a conditional subset i_wtr. Step 3: In this subset I add 0.3 to all values in the IOLM_AST column. Step 4: Now I am looking for the best way to Œmerge¹ the altered subset back into the original iolm data.frame ## STEP 1 >iolm ID IOLM_AST IOLM_AXIS 1 1 1.15 165.33 2 2 1.20 79.00 3 3 0.40

Hi all,Is there any way to tell LLVM some additional information about the variables in the code in order to make better optimization?For example, if my function has a certain precondition (such as x>0) then it will be possible to better optimize the code given that information (which the compiler does not know).I am new in this field and I don't know if there are ways to tell the compiler

Thank you, it was what I really was searching for :) However, I don't know if I well understood. I've find this link in the second link which seemed what i was looking for: http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/BuiltinUnreachable.txt .If I put around the code block (inside my function with precondition (x>0 && y>0)) a contruct like that that use __builtin_unreachable: int foo(int

I am trying to use the LME package to run a multilevel logistic model using the following code: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------- Model1 = GLMM(WEAP ~ TSRAT2 , random = ~1 | GROUP , family = binomial, na.action = na.omit ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Niko Zarzani <koni10 at hotmail.it> wrote: > Thank you, it was what I really was searching for :) > > However, I don't know if I well understood. I've find this link in the > second link which seemed what i was looking for: > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/BuiltinUnreachable.txt . > If I put around the code block (inside my

I''m trying to setup some DNAT and the packets seem to be disappearing after the PREROUTING step. The packets are coming in eth2 (both LOG targets in iptables and tcpdump confirm this). They are then DNATed to an IP that should cause them to go out eth3. However I never see them go out that interface. I have tried putting LOG rules into the FORWARD chain with no success. I''m

Dear users, I have several columns of data (each column containing monthly data for a particular year from january - december) . I would wish to combine the columns to get a Single column of continuous data as shown in (b) below. I have read this data as table in R (a) Data example Year 1903 1904 1905 1906 Jan 125.0 30.0 113.0 5.0 Feb 128.0 100.0 70.0 388.0

I am setting to a shorewall system with 4 NIC''s as per the outline specification below. Can anyone please have a look and let me know what I have missed and what I have got wrong as I want to take this system live ASAP but do not want to kill internet access and the hosting for too long ! I have listed below the system outline & have attached the config files that I have changed, if