similar to: [PATCH] Fix WindowsRT build

Hi All, Cortex-M4 is a single issue CPU whereas A8 is dual issue so this is the main reason you are seeing a slow-down, use of NEON I would say is secondary, certainly for CELT. We (ESPICO) have done optimisation work on OPUS v1.1 and have ARM implementations about twice the speed of the 'off the shelf' version. Please contact me directly if you want to discuss further. Cliff

_WIN32, WIN32, WIN64, and _WIN64 are the wrong definitions to be gating this on in the first place. They aren't at all meant to be x86/x86-64 specific. At best, they're 32-bit/64-bit specific, but that's not the intended use in the code. The correct definitions are _M_IX86 and _M_X64, as Martin said. I sent a patch to this ML that fixed these a few months ago but it was

Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen <hugo at beauzee.fr> wrote: > --- > src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c > b/src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c > index c61d27f3..1437b41e 100644 > --- a/src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c > +++ b/src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c >

On 11/06/2014 10:55 PM, Martin Storsj? wrote: > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > >> Is there any consensus on what's the correct fix here? > > Cameron's fix looks correct to me (I didn't read the code closely enough > in my first comment). > > // Martin > _______________________________________________ > opus mailing list > opus at

Yeah that's the one. On Nov 6, 2014 1:23 PM, "Tristan Matthews" <le.businessman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Cameron Gutman <aicommander at gmail.com> > wrote: > > _WIN32, WIN32, WIN64, and _WIN64 are the wrong definitions to be gating > this > > on in the first place. They aren't at all meant to be x86/x86-64 >

On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Is there any consensus on what's the correct fix here? Cameron's fix looks correct to me (I didn't read the code closely enough in my first comment). // Martin

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Hugo Beauzee-Luyssen wrote: > On 11/06/2014 10:55 PM, Martin Storsj? wrote: >> On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> >>> Is there any consensus on what's the correct fix here? >> >> Cameron's fix looks correct to me (I didn't read the code closely enough >> in my first comment). >> > > That looks good

Hi, This patchet allows a few targets to be disabled when unrequired. The rational is coming from VLC's contrib buildsystem, so far we use make -C to select only some subparts of the available targets. It would be easier and cleaner to use autoconf to do so IMHO. There's an additional patch which fixes the build when building for WinRT/UWP platform, upstreamed from VLC. We have a couple

--- celt/float_cast.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/celt/float_cast.h b/celt/float_cast.h index ede6574..4892e2c 100644 --- a/celt/float_cast.h +++ b/celt/float_cast.h @@ -90,14 +90,14 @@ #include <math.h> #define float2int(x) lrint(x) -#elif (defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER >= 1400) && (defined (WIN64) || defined (_WIN64))

On 01/06/2017 01:53 PM, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote: > Hi, > > This patchet allows a few targets to be disabled when unrequired. > The rational is coming from VLC's contrib buildsystem, so far we use make -C to select only some subparts of the available targets. > It would be easier and cleaner to use autoconf to do so IMHO. > > There's an additional patch which fixes

On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Hugo Beauz?e-Luyssen wrote: > --- > celt/float_cast.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/celt/float_cast.h b/celt/float_cast.h > index ede6574..4892e2c 100644 > --- a/celt/float_cast.h > +++ b/celt/float_cast.h > @@ -90,14 +90,14 @@ > #include <math.h> > #define float2int(x) lrint(x) > >

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Cameron Gutman <aicommander at gmail.com> wrote: > _WIN32, WIN32, WIN64, and _WIN64 are the wrong definitions to be gating this > on in the first place. They aren't at all meant to be x86/x86-64 specific. > At best, they're 32-bit/64-bit specific, but that's not the intended use in > the code. The correct definitions are _M_IX86 and

Is there any consensus on what's the correct fix here? Jean-Marc On 06/11/14 04:26 PM, Cameron Gutman wrote: > Yeah that's the one. > > On Nov 6, 2014 1:23 PM, "Tristan Matthews" <le.businessman at gmail.com > <mailto:le.businessman at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Cameron Gutman > <aicommander at gmail.com

Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote: >> configure.ac: Allow the programs to be disabled >> configure.ac: Allow bench to be disabled >> configure.ac: Don't build any tests when they are explicitely disabled >> configure.ac: Allow examples to be disabled >> win_utf8_io: Avoid forbidden functions when building for WinRT/UWP >> >> configure.ac

Hello CentOS List, I have a server that has SysV script supplied by a hardware manufacturer, which is not functioning properly. From my reading, systemd-sysv-generator should handle them (like it did for Dell OpenManage software which supplied SysV init scripts). /usr/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-sysv-generator Takes no or 3 arguments (it tells me), but I didn't find clear

Dear Customer, Please find attached a copy of the Summer Offer sheet which we've extended to the end of February! To place an order please contact a member of the UK sales team. Kind regards, The UK Sales Team Free Phone: 00800 8424 9328 Mike Truscott - Sales Manager UK Tel: 07710 842822 Jason Allum - Southern Area Sales Manager Tel: 07766 733322 -------------- next

Hi, My config dovecot 2.2.13 Postfix 2.9.6 Debian wheezy When I send a message to my user test (siroco) postfix said unknown user But the user exist : doveadm user siroco : field value uid 3002 gid 2000 home /var/spool/dovecot/mail/s/siroco mail maildir:~/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs postmap -vq siroco ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_virtual_aliases.cf return siroco 2 questions : postfix search

Hello, I can't make a brand new APC SmartUPS 1000 (REF SMT1000I) communicate with a ubuntu 8.04 server via usb port. NUT version 2.2.1 seems to be the last on ubuntu 8.04 Could you help me please ? Thanks Herv? Mazzilli ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- root at myserver: lsusb -vvv --> Protocol spec without prior Class and

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/29/2015 09:13 AM, Mike - st257 wrote: > >> ~]# /etc/init.d/lsi_mrdsnmpd start >> Reloading systemd: [ OK ] >> Starting lsi_mrdsnmpd (via systemctl): Failed to start >> lsi_mrdsnmpd.service: Unit lsi_mrdsnmpd.service failed to

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster will be restarted in few minutes. Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150227/3a3d9497/attachment.html>