similar to: Address range not being blocked

I found a command-line program that did this once before, used it for a while and then forgot about it until right now and I'll be damned if I can find it again. A command line IP calculator that takes an address range and give it back in cidr format. I found an online one that does this here: http://www.ipaddresslocation.org/subnet-mask-calculator.php But I would prefer to have the

i´ve been searching for a load balance solution since a month ago... what i can say is that it simply doesn´t work. I was unable to find one guy that did it with sucess. When "load balance" is the subject of the message on the list, the message is simply ignored. So... if it doesn´t work... why LARTC don´t delete it from the HOW TO and answer us with some "it simply doesn´t

TEST-A.txt: list of ip address ranges [AS/isp's in a country] TEST-B.txt: list of ip addresses I just need to know, if an ip in the TEST-B.txt is in a range of TEST-A.txt cat "TEST-A.txt" 63.31.63.0/24;9007;44536 64.65.0.0/19;9000;8263 62.64.14.0/21;9001;6852 cat "TEST-B.txt" 63.31.63.2 64.66.5.4 63.31.63.66 62.64.14.231 output: 63.31.63.0/24;9007;44536 63.31.63.2

Some time ago i sent to the list a problem i was having with facts on fedora core 6 and wasn''t able to find a solution at that time, but with the release of RHEL5 and CentOS 5 based on fc6 i have hit the problem again. i have written several facts to collect information about a clients network and i am also using the vmware fact from the wiki. i have separated my original fact into

Hi all, Can pls share your experience on this? Currently I have this network: 10.1.16.0/22. 10.1.16.0-10.16.17.254 are DHCP managed 10.1.18.0-10.1.19.254 are statically assigned If I need to expand it to: 10.1.16.0/20 1. What is the best way to do it with minimal network disruption? 2. If I keep some machine with 22 subnet mask, will it still be able to talk to the other machines in it's

Hello, I have a T100P card on a Red Hat 8 machine with Asterisk installed on it and I'm trying to get the data routing properly through it. I purchased an Integrated Data/Voice T1 Line with channels 1-6 voice and 13-24 data. The line is plugged directly into the Asterisk machine's T100P card. Previous to the asterisk set up we had an Adtran router that connected everything to what the

Hello All, I am trying to setup a linux box as a forwarding router based of src IP. The problem is that it does forward the pkts to the intended server specified in the ip rule, but it also forwards it to the original dst (dst specified in the pkt). Here is the setup: [10.1.0.166] [192.168.1.225] |

Perhaps someone can help me understand why this is happening. I''m trying to write a script using ''shorewall iprange'' to parse some ip ranges into subnets so that i can place them into the blocklist. I keep getting an error when i run the script though. Here is the script: #!/bin/csh foreach i (`cat ipranges`) shorewall iprange $i >>

I would like to add a rule allowing only the address 192.168.150.20 and the range of addresses from 192.169.150.100 to 192.168.150.150 in zone dmz0 to connect to two terminal servers in the local zone. Is there a syntax that can specify a range of addresses in the rules file? Do I have to enter each one separately? -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator DPSI 6033 W.Century Blvd.

Changes since Beta 1: Problems Corrected: 1. Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a "-" were mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule. New Features: 1. The limit of 256 addresses for an address range has been removed. Shorewall now decomposes the range into an optimal set of network/host addresses (see also the

Dear All, Firstly, thank you very much - shorewall is great. I''m not a member of this list, and please forgive me if I am suggesting something stupid, but the following occurs to me, and I thought it might be useful. Why no make it possible to specify zones as well as interfaces in the /etc/shorewall/masq file ? Eg: instead of: eth0 eth1 one might write: net loc (or masq in

Hi, in shorewall version 3.4.8 used this rule to block access to Facebook through port 443 (https): /shorewall/rules: REJECT loc net:69.171.224.12, 69.171.224.0/19,69.63.176.0/20,66.220.144.0/20 tcp 443 What I did was block the public IP network segment to fitthrough https. Now I use this same rule in version 4.4 and I works already. Has anything changed in this

i get the following error WARNING : no network interfaces found. when i run smbclient or nmblookup etc. the following is the settings in my computer. workgroup = TRIDENTMUMBAI security = domain password server = 10.160.128.152 netbios name = smbsys interfaces = 192.168.1.225 encrypt passwords = yes -- Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy the

Shorewall 1.4.6 is now available. Thanks to Francesca Smith, the 1.4.6 Sample configurations are also available. The release is currently available at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall It will be available at the other mirrors shortly. This is a minor release of Shorewall. Problems Corrected: 1) A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered

My home lan is 192.168.174.240/29 so that I have 192.168.174.240 as net, 192.168.174.247 as broadcast and space for 6 hosts (have 2 PC and one router). Now I would like to edit the rfc1918 file in order to exclude this range from the list. What is the way to compute the most compact notation to say that only 192.168.0.0-192.168.174.239 and 192.168.174.248-192.168.255.255 are to be discarded

Hi I have samba domain controller in my network. and recently I have changed the netmask of the network. Then nmbd is not working could you please help me to solve this issue ---------------------------------------------------------------- nmbd -i nmbd version 3.5.6 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2010 Unknown parameter encountered: "wide symlinks"

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Summary: iptables iprange Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: paulo.santos at

Hi all Can someone explain me this: ifcfg-eth0-range1: ONBOOT="yes" IPADDR_START="192.168.1.48" IPADDR_END="192.168.1.55" CLONENUM_START="1" Why Bcast is 192.168.1.51 and why Mask is 255.255.255.252 ? OS: Centos 6.3/64bit Thanks Levi # ifconfig eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:9C:02:99:FA:00 inet addr:192.168.1.48

I've seen this asked before in various forums and even on here, but never answered; here is a list of the symptoms and what I have done, hopefully someone here will have a solution. I have an Ubuntu10.04 server running samba3.4.7 and I have a (fleet of) Lenovo Thinkpad Edge's running win7Pro64 If the Samba server has been assigned a static IP address then the Lenovo will not join the

Hi again List, Well this time I’m writing for a friend (really J). He needs to create a distance matrix based on an abundance matrix using the 1-Pearson’s R index. Well I told him to look at the proxy package, but there is only Pearson Index. He needs it to perform a clustering. Well, as soon as he told me there proxy only had the Pearson index I thought: “He could just do something like