similar to: NHW Project - high compression (-l6 setting and below)

Hello Ken, Many thanks for your reply! Yes, I very need to adapt the NHW codec to any image size.But actually it is the least interesting part, I don't think that it is that difficult (compared to creating high compression settings) but it is very boring, annoying... Really not the part that I prefer... For now, as I am jobless, my aim is to have "pleasure" with the NHW Project and

Hello Spork, > If you want though, when I find some time, I can work on supporting a better command line parsing. Yes that would be great as my command line parsing is not good at all. > Does your codec compile under Linux? If not, that's something I can try to work on as well. I never tested my codec under Linux )-:, and so it would be also great to compile it under Linux.I think

Hello, I have re-tested -l4 high compression setting and it's clear that it lacks of precision on degraded, rather blurred images. So I don't know if it is a good idea to base the other lower quality settings (-l5,-l6,...) on -l4 setting.I have tested the NHW codec against x265, x264, Daala, WebP, Rududu, DLI and it's clear that at high compression these very good codecs have more

Hello, Just a quick message to let you know that I have improved -l6 quality setting. This high compression quality setting is now competitive with x265 (HEVC).Actually I prefer -l6 high compression setting compared to x265 on many images (not blurred)... Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ Else, do some of you could test the NHW Project under Linux? Many thanks! Cheers, Raphael

Hello, Just a quick message to let you know that I have really improved very high compression of the NHW Project from -l8 to -l13 quality settings, and we can still save 2.5KB per .nhw compressed file. Actually I am new to very high compression, it is just 3 months that I am working on it (I put on pause the NHW Project from August 2013 to February 2018 )... And I realize that very high

I don't mind at all. I imagine there are more people like me out there who have been following your work, but haven't said anything. I agree that a series of pages explaining how things work may lead to more contributions. At the very least it would lead to more people being better educated on how wavelets work in image compression. But, this is your project, if you don't have the

Hello all, Just a quick message to let you know that I have improved -l6 and -l7 high compression settings. These settings are notably better now, with more neatness and more precision.I find them competitive with x265 (HEVC) now!!! Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ Else I realize that the strength of the NHW Project is that it is royalty-free, and competitive with the great x265 codec

Hi David! Many thanks for your very encouraging and kind feedback!!! (Hope you don't mind that I made your post public on the Theora channel). I try to be the more sincere as I can in my posts.Some people suggested me to make demo pages to explain how the codec works step by step, and I realize that it would be good, because certainly it will show that the NHW codec is not that complex and

Hello Dave, Thank you very much for your support and your interest. Actually so few people took a look at the NHW Project, but with this version the NHW Project is becoming very interesting, it is royalty-free and very fast furthermore. Really if you could find time, I would be very interested in any opinion from the Xiph.org community! Cheers, Raphael 2018-04-28 21:40 GMT+02:00 Dave

Hello, I've found some time to get back to the NHW Project.In fact a Xiph forum member told me that even if I will start a new job, he hopes that I will still continue to develop a little the NHW Project, on my spare time.I told him that I would furthermore spend my spare time on the NHW Project if a community around the project could emerge... and he told me that certainly the best way for

Thank you so much Sir!!! If you have time, do not hesitate to let us know what you would think of the NHW Project.Any remark, opinion would be very welcome! Many thanks again! Best regards, Raphael 2018-04-28 23:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Johnson Games <davefilms.us at gmail.com>: > Cool, I'll check it out. > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 3:09 PM Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com>

Of course I will! On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 4:06 PM Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you so much Sir!!! > > If you have time, do not hesitate to let us know what you would think of > the NHW Project.Any remark, opinion would be very welcome! > > Many thanks again! > Best regards, > Raphael > > 2018-04-28 23:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Johnson Games

Cool, I'll check it out. On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 3:09 PM Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Dave, > > Thank you very much for your support and your interest. > > Actually so few people took a look at the NHW Project, but with this > version the NHW Project is becoming very interesting, it is royalty-free > and very fast furthermore. > > Really

Hello, I have just tested new next lower quality settings (-l3 and -l4), I can diminish residual coding but if I increase wavelet coeffs threshold there is more aliasing.And even in the current mid quality settings there is some aliasing, this is the big drawback of the NHW codec. SPIHT algorithm is good for that as for example Rududu codec doesn't have aliasing at all at mid compression and

Hello, If it could be of interest, here are new speed measurement for -l13 very high compression setting. For x265 (HEVC), I use BPG codec, and this time I use -m 0 setting which uses the fastest encoding setting of x265.I run the .exe 10x times and I pick the best scores. So here are the timings at -l13 very high compression: Encode time: x265 (BPG -m 0): 80ms NHW: 20ms Decode time: x265

Hello, I don't have worked on the NHW Project this past week (I also have to work on an other project) but I found time today to make an "extensive" testing of x265 (HEVC) and the NHW codec at high compression (-l7 setting). That's right that x265 is a very good codec! Really impressive.The NHW Project is not as good, it can only compete with x265 (HEVC) on quite high quality

Hello, Could some of you take a look at the image comparison between the NHW Project and x265 (HEVC) at high compression, available here: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ . I would be very very interested in your opinion, and it would help me to perfect the NHW Project.For me the NHW Project has more neatness, and x265 has more precision. Else, I was a little lazy these past months, as I

Hello, I have just added a new -l18 "extreme" compression quality setting to the NHW Project.I find this quality setting very good and actually better than x265 (HEVC). First, I wanted to let you know that compression of the wavelet DC image is really not efficient at extreme compression, I have the fast ideas to improve it, and so we can really save 2.5KB per .nhw compressed files in

Hello, So thanks to helpful forum feedbacks, I know now that I have to create a website for the NHW Project, make demo pages of the technology, and all that with good visual design.It won't be such easy for me... For example, I can easily supply a description, explanation of the different steps of the algorithm, I can supply images encoded at mid-compression with NHW, x265, WebP, JPEG,...

Hello, I have improved quality for -l4 and -l5 high compression settings.These settings are now really better and very competitive, I now prefer them compared to x265 (HEVC). Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ I am also working on -l6 quality setting, I can simply increase quantization for it but I am not totally satisfied with this solution for now... Looking for more advanced processing