similar to: flac -- exhaustive model search vs. -A <*>?

"Linda A. Walsh" <flac at tlinx.org> wrote: > what does the exhaustive model search do? I am not an expert on the guts of FLAC, but there is some information about this at: http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_format_overview.html and scroll down to "MODELING". > Does it try all of the functions listed under "-A" to find the 'best', >

Martin Leese wrote: > > At: > http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_tools_flac.html#flac_options_exhaustive_model_search > > it states, "If the max LPC order is high this > can significantly increase the encode time." > This suggest that if the max LPC order is low > then using -e will not be slow. > ---- That brings up another question then... What

Emmanuel Florac via samba wrote: > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate users" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate users" > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate groups" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate groups" It may be irrelevant, but I have: winbind enum groups = Yes winbind enum users

Emmanuel Florac wrote: > id TESTAD\\testuser > returns "no such user" and > > getent passwd TESTAD\\testuser > > returns a "2" code. > ---- On linux, to get 'domain\user' to resolve, I had to have those entries in my /etc/passwd (and /etc/group for groups). I.e. *w/o krb*, (in samba 3.x), I had entries like:

I realized in looking at my smb.conf, I'm not using these in a consistent manner, and .... well I just don't understand what the differences are between them. Sure I can read the smb.conf page: %U session username (the username that the client wanted, not necessarily the same as the one they got). vs. %u username of the current service, if any. ---

Why would the samba list be looking for a reverse host name via IPV6? IFAIK I only have an IPv4 addr and reverse addr. I don't know if the original went to the person in france or not. Anyone else getting bounces like this? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:19:19 -0700 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem

Was there some reason that patch got dropped? Otherwise rsync eats up all the buffer memory. Note -- I tried directio -- didn't work due to alignment issues -- buffers have to be aligned to sectors. The kernel, if I remember correctly, has been on again/off again on requiring alignment on directio -- because most of the drivers and devices do for directio to work, at. "dd"

Hi We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group: On Windows 7 share: -rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp On Samba share: -rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp The

Shayne Wissler <wissler at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a program that is given a random file and needs to determine > whether it is Vorbis or FLAC. For Vorbis, there are various places > where I can infer that I have a bad stream. But for FLAC, when I call > either FLAC__stream_decoder_process_until_end_of_metadata or > FLAC__stream_decoder_process_single, it searches the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Summary: Slow Performance over Network rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Joerg.Grube at Gmx.De

I'm trying to find out what's causing this slowdown -- it's INTOLERABLE.... over 1 minute and less than 1% done. (400MB file)... After trying 3 times, I gave up and logged in using X to the server and ran Tbird from there.... Mail sent out in < 1 minute, though the copy to dovecot took about 50% longer. So... I looked at the network trace. and everyfrackin' body was

Familiar? protocol error on a local file copy? How can I have a proto incompat when it it is talking to itself?... This was on the ERROUT... rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken pipe (32) File-list index 531530 not in 531937 - 533437 (finish_hard_link) [generator] rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(652) [generator=3.0.9] rsync:

Yves Goergen wrote: > The issue still exists. Can anybody explain to me why dovecot creates > IMAP folders with the wrong filesystem permissions? On a lark, I looked through my dirs @ permissions. Shorted lines a bit so they'd fit w/o extra lines between them using: (get rid of text before permissions, and shorten user/group to a few letter) find . -type d -ls|sed -r

In the smb.conf manpage, there is a notation used, (G) or (S) for global or share. Does (S) mean it can only be used in a Share section (i.e. - will be ignored in the global section), or is that they *can* be applied at the share level, and, possibly set a default in the 'G'lobal section? example: "ea support = yes" Seems like that could mean that extended attrs are

what does the exhaustive model search do? Does it try all of the functions listed under "-A" to find the 'best', i.e. bartlett, bartlett_hann, blackman, blackman_har- ris_4term_92db, connes, flattop, gauss(STDDEV), hamming, hann, kaiser_bessel, nuttall, rectangle, triangle, tukey(P), welch. Or is that something else? I've been using the -e option for a while in

FYI, the same bug apears if one mounts the file system using "cifs": -rwxr----- 1 user 2532415 2000-04-02 00:34:50.000000000 -0800 fo1.mp3* -rwxr----- 1 user 3876671 2000-03-12 21:33:20.000000000 -0800 fo2.mp3* Linda W wrote: > Summary: > There appears to be a bug in the "time range" Samba is using on > dates where time is scheduled to "Spring Forward"

Hello to all, After a lot of trying this is the solution for all with samba 3.2.15 installed. My Windows 7 client machine joins the domain on the fly with this registry hack. I can logon without errors and all my netlogon scripts are working: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Para meters] "DomainCompatibilityMode"=dword:00000001

You right. I joined my Linux box into Windows domain.Of course. I attached my "smb.conf". Can you see it? On Saturday, December 27, 2014 3:36 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: On 27/12/14 06:44, Jason Long wrote: > Thank you so much. > No, I'm not. I joined my linux to Windows domain because of AD. I can define some users in my Linux

I never used four different Workgroup or Domain. My domain is "jasondomain" and as you see my last "smb.conf" it is. I change "MYGROUP" to "jasondomain" but problem not solved. On Saturday, December 27, 2014 7:02 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: On 27/12/14 14:18, Jason Long wrote: > Thank you so much. > I

Thank you so much. No, I'm not. I joined my linux to Windows domain because of AD. I can define some users in my Linux and Windows clients use it to open share and ... but my problem is that I have a lot of users and groups and Redefine all of them in Linux is a little silly :(. I joined my Linux to Windows domain because of use AD users and groups. About your question : "Where did you