similar to: FLAC and Window 7 64bit

I seem to recall that changes in the second number indicated a minor change in the *format* of the file itself (for example, 1.1.x to 1.2.x introduced a new rice coding option used for 24-bit files). Are there any format changes that would justify that ? Otherwise, 1.2.2 would seem more appropriate, not to minimize the work that you are doing... Cheers, Pyt. http://www.mjuware.com On Sat, Jan

The initial rule was, if I can recall correctly : - Changes in the first digit (e.g. 1.x.x to 2.x.x) indicate a break in backwards compatibility ; i.e. the formats are totally different. - Changes in the second digit indicate backward-compatible changes in the format (i.e. a 1.1.x-encoded file is only a particular case of a 1.2.x-encoded file) - Changes in the third digit reflect any other,

I tried that approach a while ago and failed miserably. Marshalling the structs of structs in the flac lib turned out to be a nightmare (I don't pretend to be an expert, mind you...). I eventually switched to writing my own C# lib from scratch. Work is still under progress. It's no rocket science, I do this a G-job. It has definite limitations (no documentation, decodes only 16-bit files,

Has anyone had any luck getting flac frontend to work with windows 7 64 bit? No matter what I try I cannot get flac to work even running it with administrator privileges. I never had a problem using fiac on my old windows XP 32 bit system. Thanks, gene -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Harry Sack wrote: > > but aren't they C++ headers en lib's? Not C++, C. > I have no idea how I can include a C++ > header in a C# project. > It this even possible? Yes. Google for "dllimport csharp". Erik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo -----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi all, I have a very large music collection that I keep on a portable hard drive (to plug in to car USB, carry with when I'm at my office, etc). All but a few dozen files are part of an album, and not a single audio file. This translates to an insane amount of files stored on my hard drive. I am very strict about how I label and file my media (I loathe unlabeled audio tracks), but

I would also add that the "level" is only relevant to the reference encoder, as it is an alias to quickly set a number of parameters. Other encoders might make different choices. Also, I haven't looked in details at how the encoder works, but I think it is based on heuristics to decide which is the best compression method for a set of samples, and I'm not sure that it would give

Hi, I'm developing a flac decoder in an embedded environment. I have it fully up and running but I am trying to optimise the performance vs. the power it takes to decode the stream. Using the reference decoder code with a few optimisations for the hw I'm on I experience quite a difference in mips depending on the level. For instance, on a 192kHz/24 bit file the difference is almost

I agree on everything you said. I did not intend or expect to have pre-release flac bundled with software, but can understand the dismay at my earlier request. If people think there should be a snapshot version for testing, I'm all for it, especially now that the build system has undergone some changes. I found that for some source distros, the removal of autogen.sh's prior features and

Going in details through the FLAC format specification, I realize that there are 2 rice coding methods now supported for residual encoding. I thought I remembered in the 1.1.3 times that there was only 1 method (with 4-bit Rice parameter) [or was I drunk ? ;-)]. Going through the change log, I didn't find any reference to such an addition to the format. Now, the decoder implementation I'm

Hi There, This is my first posting to this board. I am having trouble encoding FLAC files from .WAV files. I get a quick flash of a DOS screen and nothing happens. Decoding FLAC files from .WAV files works fine. Is this a known issue with Vista? Is there a workaround or a fix? Thanks! Dwight

Is there any size limitation for album art? I have a user who says adding large artwork (from a scanner) is corrupting the file metadata. I don't know if this is a flac limitation, a tag lib issue, or something I'm doing. Thanks, Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Pierre-Yves Thoulon wrote: > None, apart from the standard metadata block size limitation (2^24 > bytes, e.g. 4GB). Pretty big for any kind of album art... 2^24 = 16777216, i.e. only 16 Megabytes. > Kind regards. > > Pyt. > > >> Le 10 mai 2017 à 17:11, Scott Brown - scottcbrown at gmail.com >> <flac-dev.pyt.8c0cc6600b.scottcbrown#gmail.com at

"Linda A. Walsh" <flac at tlinx.org> wrote: > what does the exhaustive model search do? I am not an expert on the guts of FLAC, but there is some information about this at: http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_format_overview.html and scroll down to "MODELING". > Does it try all of the functions listed under "-A" to find the 'best', >

Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >> Can you share samples? > > It's a 470 MB copyrighted music album. I could but I don't think it's legal. How about sharing the album name (if it's popular enough)? (but then it would be good to post its CUETools verification log if the album has multiple pressings with different offsets...)

Hi List, Is there a way to correctly use the replay-gain feature on flac files that contain an entire album (i.e., multiple tracks with seekpoints added from a cue sheet)? -- Chris

On Jan 12, 2013, at 14:28, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 12-01-13 22:46, Brian Willoughby wrote: >> I would suggest that everyone keep in mind the vast installed base of >> hardware FLAC recorders and players, and not senselessly make them >> obsolete without extremely compelling reasons. > > This can be done for the same reason the change from 1.1 to 1.2 > added

On Jan 12, 2013, at 05:30, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 12-01-13 08:23, pyth.flac-dev.5.pyt at spamgourmet.com wrote: >> I seem to recall that changes in the second number indicated a minor >> change in the *format* of the file itself (for example, 1.1.x to >> 1.2.x >> introduced a new rice coding option used for 24-bit files). > > Well, the only change in

Buenos días, hago un mapa con ggplot: world<-map_data('world') windows();ggplot(legend=FALSE) + ... geom_point(data=Data,aes(x=lon,y=lat,color=Clst),size=1.25) + scale_color_manual(values=c("grey45","navy","skyblue","gold","green3","darkgreen")) + geom_path( data=world, aes(x=long, y=lat,group=group)) + labs(title =

is wrapping c++ any easier? because there is libFLAC++ otherwise, if you only need a certain subset of what FLAC does it might be easier to write a smaller C interface + wrapper implementation, then import that in c#. Josh --- Pyt <py.thoulon@gmail.com> wrote: > I tried that approach a while ago and failed miserably. Marshalling > the > structs of structs in the flac lib turned