similar to: playback problems with oppo BDP-95

Correct me if wrong, but I was under the impression that the processing required for playback was totally independent on the level of compression. The encoder looks for polynomials that fit, and it takes much more processing to find polynomials with a very good fit and small residuals. On the other hand, the decoder just has to multiply out the stored prediction, which is independent of the

Thanks for bringing up this aspect, Nicholas. I seem to recall that specific hardware has a problem with certain compression levels, but I cannot recall whether that was limited to just encoding, or decoding as well. It could very well be true that I am conflating my vague memory of encoder limitations with decoder limitations. It does seem to be that the oppo BDP-95 is exhibiting

Version 1.2.1 of the standard/spec or the local implementation? I've not seen "FLAC 1.0/1.1 Compliant" or "FLAC 1.2 Compliant" on the specs of hardware gear for example when FLAC is stated supported. Just a curious on-looker. On 7 February 2011 02:34, Pierre-Yves Thoulon <py.thoulon at gmail.com> wrote: > Version 1.2.1 introduced new rice coding techniques

Version 1.2.1 introduced new rice coding techniques that are used by the reference encoder for 24 bit files. An older version of the decoder will have trouble with frames that use this encoding... Maybe that's where the strange noises come from... Pyt. On 6 f?vr. 2011, at 06:01, Brian Willoughby <brianw at sounds.wa.com> wrote: > Thanks for bringing up this aspect, Nicholas. I

What is a "local implementation?" Do you mean the hardware version number? I think Pierre-Yves may be correct. There certainly were some changes to 24-bit support, and many of these problematic FLAC files are HD audio. In other words, they're not simply 16-bit 44.1 kHz CD audio converted to FLAC, but they are 24/96 or 24/192 audio in FLAC format. The only curious thing

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311 Summary: Performance on high BDP networks Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: imorgan at

Hi everyone, I''m doing some networking experiments over high BDP topologies. Right now the configuration is quite simple -- two Xen boxes connected via a dummynet router. The dummynet router is set to limit bandwidth to 500Mbps and simulate an RTT of 80ms. I''m using the following sysctl values: net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 4194304 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Blocks|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Darren Tucker <dtucker

Dear list, > Which "output file" are you referring to?? Also, your question is incompletely specified, because you do not qualify whether the input is the same when you expect the output to be the same. My question is the following: For any encoding option (e.g. -5, default), does the flac encoder produce the same byte-for-byte output regardless of the CPU? Regards, Fernando

Hello, I know this has come up before; but is the HPN patch (or elements thereof) currently being considered for integration in to the OpenSSH code base? Are there pending issues (buffer management, none cipher, etc) which still need to be addressed? We have been using HPN-SSH for over a year now, and like others, have observed significant performance improvement over standard OpenSSH. I can

Howdy, As a note, we now have HPN patch for OpenSSH 4.2 at http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Its still part of the last set of patches (HPN11) so there aren't any additional changes in the code. It patches, configures, compiles, and passes make tests without a problem. I've not done extensive testing for this version of openssh but I don't foresee any problems. I

Someone sent me a question late last night and I briefly looked at his file this morning and couldn't figure out the answer, so I'm posting here. A friend has a a ~275MB 24 bit, 48khz stereo wav file of rock music that when compressed using flac level 8 gives a flac file under 110 MB in size. When I dithered his file to 16/48 and converted that file to flac, the resulting flac file was

We have developed a patch that enables changing the SSH window size using the tcp window size as the source. This allows SSH to obtain maximum use of the bandwidth on high BDP links. We also have a page that describes the changes and performance. http://www.psc.edu/~rapier/hpn-ssh/ The patch against CVS is included here. Common subdirectories: src/usr.bin/ssh/CVS and ssh/CVS diff -u

Hi all, We know that Hermite polynomial is for Gaussian, Laguerre polynomial for Exponential distribution, Legendre polynomial for uniform distribution, Jacobi polynomial for Beta distribution. Does anyone know which kind of polynomial deals with the log-normal, Student抯 t, Inverse gamma and Fisher抯 F distribution? Thank you in advance! David [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All, I need to evaluate a series expansion using Legendre polynomials. Using the 'orthopolinom' package I can get a list of the first n Legendre polynomials as character strings. > library(orthopolynom) > l<-legendre.polynomials(4) > l [[1]] 1 [[2]] x [[3]] -0.5 + 1.5*x^2 [[4]] -1.5*x + 2.5*x^3 [[5]] 0.375 - 3.75*x^2 + 4.375*x^4 But I can't figure out how to

I am trying to get new Cusip (registered security) from old . This can be done in excel using BDP command. For example: =BDP("000361AJ Corp","ID_CUSIP"), will give 000361AK1. Can this be done using RBloomberg? Any help will be much appreciated. Chirag Maru Senior Quantitative Analyst IRON Financial 847-715-3221 Direct | 847-715-3321 Fax | 847-715-3200 Main 630 Dundee

Could the problem be that the e100 can do IP receive checksumming on the board, but the eepro driver doesn't enable it. When the board is doing checksum offload, then the csum field isn't set. Please try disabling receive checksumming on the e100 driver modprobe e100 XsumRX=0 If this is the problem, it exists both 2.4 and 2.6. On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:24:57 +0200 Hannes Schulz

Looking to the wonderful statistical advice that this group can offer. In behavioral science applications of stats, we are often introduced to coefficients for orthogonal polynomials that are nice integers. For instance, Kirk's experimental design book presents the following coefficients for p=4: Linear -3 -1 1 3 Quadratic 1 -1 -1 1 Cubic -1 3 -3 1 In R orthogonal

Hi Folks! Im using the function poly to generate orthogonal polynomials, but Id like to see the actual polynomials so that I could convert it to a polynomial in my original variable. Is that possible and if so how do I do it? /E