similar to: Flac] Where Cover Art?

You said "With the exception of where to put a picture file, VorbisComments in a Vorbis stream are the same as VorbisComments in a FLAC stream." In METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE case they would not be the same. Up to now we could exchange the complete block of VorbisComments. But with the addiction of METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE doesn't happen this way. In Ogg files the METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE

OK Martin. Thank you for the explanations and for your time. I am writing a program that reads and writes all existent Tags types. It lacks only to end the edition (rewriting) of "Native" Flac and Matroska. Both cases for the same problem: the separation of Tags and Picture in different blocks. In Flac I resolved it, but now I have to add METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE. Reading Vorbis

Hello to the people reading this list! I am developing tagging support for ogg vorbis in Nero products and we are currently thinking of supporting cover art in ogg files. What is the current state of proposal for cover art in ogg files? Is this http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/VorbisComment#Cover_art still the latest information? Regards, Goran -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

>> So, a possible way to encode album art would be: >> >> - a Skeleton stream with appropriate header messages >> - one Kate stream per image, carrying a PNG image >> (alternatively, use Ogg/MNG, if someone brings it from the dead) >> [...] Silvia wrote: >Interesting proposal. Not sure it won't over-complicate album art though... Well yes, of course

Hi, there was a thread a few months ago about album art, and how to embed it in an Ogg stream. The outcome was unconclusive, and kind of settled on the existing practice of adding a uuencoded image in a Vorbis comment, or similar. A better solution would be to embed those images as a separate stream, including hints as to what image represents (front cover, back cover, etc). The obvious

On 13-Oct-08, at 2:10 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > is coverart a header-type content or a time-aligned type content? Well, it's collection-level metadata, so it doesn't belong in files at all. :) > It was my impression that it is mostly header-type content, i.e. > concerns the full file rather than segments of it. It makes sense to reference it per-chain-segment in an Ogg

Hello, I read through the specifications here: http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html but the document is not "autonomous". Instead, sections entitled "prediction" and "residual coding", use external references, some of with are unavailable (dead link) or in poor state. What i mean here is that it is not possible to write a decoder from scratch using only the spec

WebP (imagepart of VP9) is better then JPG AVIF (imagepart of VPX/AV1) is better then HEIF please support in OPUS file for album arts more then JPG and PNG... WebP and AVIF are free imageformats can store multiple images thats good for the problem with METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE only can store one file. i try to push some devs of player and converter to support this too. wbr from berlin

Somebody (sorry, can't find original post) wrote: >> I don't mind (and approve of) the idea of reusing as much of proven >> standards as we can. But putting it in a Vorbis comment will in fact >> piss off people who then can't play the file. It's not as much a >> qestion of displaying the tag as text (although that is a concern) >> it's that most

On 14 April 2012 23:40, Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 April 2012 23:34, Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > >> http://pastebin.com/xXhPyZuQ > >> ./jpegtoblock.pl ?-i DSCN7376.JPG -o flacblock > >> You'll need to add the "METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE=" which makes it into a >> comment file yourself. >> >

> is coverart a header-type content or a time-aligned type content? > > Well, it's collection-level metadata, so it doesn't belong in files at all. :) Well right, but the problem is that external coverart files are unhandy (broken links!!, streaming...) Users therefore want to embed them most times, as you can tell from other audio file formats: the majority of cover art is

Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Martin Leese wrote: >> Anyway, calling alloc()s with no corresponding >> free()s is a memory leak. Not good code. > > The alloca() function allocates space on the stack and > that allocation is automatically freed when the function > that did the allocation returns. > > The Linux man page is quite

" Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves " <justivo at gmail.com> wrote: ... > To be fair, only the Vorbis users requested albumart. FLAC users > should in theory be able to use the tag too if they want, but this > wouldn't be something we'd see in other codecs like Speex and Theora. This is a minor point, but FLAC users can already do this using METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE (which

Oops, meant to add, there's absolutely no restrictions on the format of any picture block, either, and opusenc will already just add whatever gets passed in without even trying to verify anything about the file format. That's up to tagging and playback software to support; foobar2000, for instance, only supports formats that are part of Windows' GDIplus library. On Fri, Jun 21, 2019

Hello, I am new to using opus but so far I really am loving it. At 16kbps spoken content sounds fabulous. I am using opusenc on 64-bit linux - mostly with flac input. The one thing I can't figure out how to do is add album art. I tried passing the vorbis way of adding a metadata_block_picture comment field to opusenc but it complained about the length. I can't seem to find any

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 14:29 +0000, Ian Malone wrote: > On 12 February 2014 13:02, Alice Wonder <alicewonder at shastaherps.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am new to using opus but so far I really am loving it. At 16kbps > > spoken content sounds fabulous. > > > > I am using opusenc on 64-bit linux - mostly with flac input. > > > > The one

I think we have to discuss a fundamental question about coverart first: is coverart a header-type content or a time-aligned type content? It was my impression that it is mostly header-type content, i.e. concerns the full file rather than segments of it. Therefore, embedding it into any of the time-aligned streams (Kate, CMML, OggMNG) doesn't make much sense to me. It should be in a header.

Hi everybody, I have a question about the following part of the METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE specification. The components: Width, Height, Color Depth, and Colors Used don't provide an "unknown" value and seem to assume that the program encoding the METADATA_BLOCK will be aware of these components of the file. As these fields seem to just provide "extra" information (I'm

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo at gmail.com> wrote: > A good proposal, except for the fact most album art is JPEG. Not > forgetting either that, semantically, it's pretty bizarre to have > album art in a text format. I *desperately* want to provide the cover art for my own album in PDF format. Presently I provide JPG in the MP3s; at 72 DPI it

2009/4/2 Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com>: > If no-one is keen then I'll take the vorbiscomment and ogginfo > patches. ?They are lower priority than actually updating the wiki, but > I might be able to do that this evening. > Adding a -s option to ogginfo and vorbiscomment to hide METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE contents git://github.com/imalone/imalone_vorbis-tools.git