similar to: Switching Left Right Channel

On Dec 17, 2009, at 11:02 PM, Brian Willoughby wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2009, at 19:00, Ron Decline wrote: >> On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:50 PM, dathead2 at gmail.com wrote: >>> On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Ron Decline <rutlecorps at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Is it possible to switch the Left / Right channel when encoding in FLAC? >>>> (I have

On Dec 17, 2009, at 19:00, Ron Decline wrote: > On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:50 PM, dathead2 at gmail.com wrote: >> On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Ron Decline <rutlecorps at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Is it possible to switch the Left / Right channel when encoding >>> in FLAC? >>> (I have some flac files with incorrect left/right channel

> On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:50 PM, dathead2 at gmail.com wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Ron Decline <rutlecorps at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it possible to switch the Left / Right channel when encoding in FLAC? >> (I have some flac files with incorrect left/right channel assignment that I would like to re-encode with flac) >> _____________________________

On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Brian Willoughby wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2009, at 20:42, Ron Decline wrote: >> Anyway, as you and dathead2 suggested, I can just flac -d, then swap the channels on the wav with SoX, and then flac -a, I can then use metaflac to transfer the tags. Easy enough to write a script to do the work. > > > flac -a will analyze, not encode. Apart from

Is it possible to switch the Left / Right channel when encoding in FLAC? (I have some flac files with incorrect left/right channel assignment that I would like to re-encode with flac)

When I run it (OS X 10.6.2), find builds a list across multiple directories and then runs metaflac, causing metaflac to report. "The FLAC file could not be opened. Most likely the file does not exist or is not readable." I would think this is the expected result as " {} + " is the same as -execdir, except that ``{}'' is replaced with as many pathnames as possible for

Ah! metaflac, thanks, but won't this cause metaflac to combine flac's across directories and give an album replay gain for the combined flac's? (as opposed to separate albums i.e. metaflac /album1/*.flac /album2/*.flac as opposed to metaflac /album1/*.flac, metaflac /album2/*.flac) On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote: > Run from the top directory: > >

I have FLAC files that I would like to re-encode with --replay-gain. I have my Flac's organized in Artist/Album folders, so I should have no problem getting an album gain/peak per album. Do I need to first de-code the flac's to wav files and then "flac --replay-gain *.wav", or can this be accomplished by going to each Album directory and "flac -f --replay-gain

There is no quality difference between FLAC variations - compressed or uncompressed (unless you force a 24-bit audio file into a 16-bit FLAC, but that may not even be possible). The only thing that varies with FLAC is the size of the file. There are many ways to store the same data, some more efficient than others. FLAC ensures that the exact same audio samples will reach your playback

File size is not important for me. I need audio data from wav file and metadata in one file. How to encode a wav file to an uncompressed flac file? Regards, Maciej ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik de Castro Lopo" <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: <flac-dev at xiph.org> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:28 AM Subject: [SPAM] Re: [flac-dev] Encode wav to uncompressed

I thought that an uncompressed FLAC file provides better sound quality than a compressed FLAC file. To Erik: How to grab the revision before this one https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=fc360735ce4d1aa88a94bfccdd3bea5bdd19a8d6? Regards, Maciej ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik de Castro Lopo" <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: <flac-dev at xiph.org> Sent:

Hello, Is it possible to encode wav file to uncompressed flac file? Regards, Maciej -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20131202/366556ee/attachment.htm

Sorry for the empty message. Pressed the wrong button. I have been wrestling with a pretty generic Asterisk configuration (version 11.11.0 ) set up with FreePBX. The trunk SIP is setup to allow ulaw,alaw,gsm, Video is disabled. I was using Eyebeam and am now trying Jitsi. Jitsi has a number of codecs enabled - opus, SILK, G722, speex,PCMU, PCMA, iLBC, GSM, G723 and telephone-event The

--- Ron Cococcia <ron.cococcia@request.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed > recently > with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and > was > wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) > is > that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags. > > I'm

Hey all We have been working with SIP for years. It has the potential to be better than Skype. It is really all in the implementation. Not all SIP soft clients are equal nor are the networks and computers they are running on. I will not bash Skype. We have tested it and in most cases choose not to use it. It has it's place and is good for the user that meets it's specific target

Maciej M?czy?ski wrote: > File size is not important for me. I need audio data from wav file and > metadata in one file. But FLAC is lossless! When you convert a WAV to FLAC, you get a file where the decoded audio data is exactly the same as in the WAV file. Why would you want a larger file that is exactly the same as the compressed file? Anyway, like I hinted in my previous email, WAV

I can't figure out how to verify flac md5 signatures. The docs say flac does an md5 over the unencoded audio data, but I can't reproduce it. I'm using flac 1.0.2 and Ron Rivest's reference md5 implementation. $ md5 temp.wav MD5 (temp.wav) = a7c92c4a656b2be2582f77c51b68a623 $ flac temp.wav $ metaflac temp.flac file: temp.flac METADATA block #0 ... MD5 signature:

On 3/12/15 9:39 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > Your characterization may be true but Skype works much better than SIP > when it comes to sound quality. > SIP is not to blame for this. Its the audio codec being used. Skype has spend a great deal of effort with their SILK codec by making it highly tolerant of packet loss and jitter. The same cannot be said for the standard codecs Asterisk

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12472 Bug ID: 12472 Summary: invalid rsync-command syntax or options with —stats Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

Hello, I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed recently with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and was wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) is that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags. I'm curious because I have been using ID3 tags with FLAC (I store extra data such as album art with my media files,