similar to: track vs album replaygain: strange values

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches similar to: "track vs album replaygain: strange values"

2009 Mar 10
1
FLAC: album replaygain value does not match any track value
Hello ! I ran FLAC over 3 wav tracks from the same CD generating replaygain info. Actually, albums gain and peak values do not match any track values (see run below). The TRACK_PEAK values are identical for the 3 tracks and, which is weird, we have one track with a TRACK_GAIN greater than the ALBUM_GAIN whereas another track has a lower value. I had expected the album values to be the maximum
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] Grip, FLAC, and album replay gain
OK, here's a problem: I want to set the album replay gain in each track, but I'm using grip to rip and encode the tracks one by one. grip knows that all the tracks are on a single album, but FLAC sees them one at a time. I put the --replay-gain option on the FLAC command line, so it emits four comments into the vorbis commebnt block, e.g.: comment[9]:
2018 Nov 25
1
libflac doesn't find more than one metadata block
Hello, I'm currently doing a little music player using libflac and libao. What I've currently done works as it should, but I have a problem where only one metadata block is detected, even if there are more (it doesn't have the last attribute set to true). This is using flac 1.3.2 on Gentoo amd64. The main code file is attached, it mainly follows the examples given with the libflac
2007 Jul 25
1
Bug: flac --replay-gain thinks that I used --no-padding
Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain > > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding > > option... > > > > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with > > --no-padding" > > > > ...even though I'm
2018 Nov 25
0
libflac doesn't find more than one metadata block
Hello, I'm currently doing a little music player using libflac and libao. What I've currently done works as it should, but I have a problem where only one metadata block is detected, even if there are more. This is using flac 1.3.2 on Gentoo amd64. The main code file is attached, it mainly follows the examples given with the libflac and libao doc. And here's what metaflac --list
2004 Sep 10
1
problems with flac?
So I recently encoded my entire CD collection (over 7000 songs) to flac and I have found that 18 of them have a strange problem.  The files are corrupted in some way.. They will stop playing abruptly in the middle of the song.  I've attached a listing of the metadata and you'll see what I mean.  You can see that the seek points toward the end have a bunch of zeros and I'm not sure
2016 Aug 11
0
opusenc confused by Replaygain tags
Hi, I think I might have kind of, sort of found a bug in opusenc. But do correct me if I am worng. :) When converting an FLAC file that contains RG tags written by bs1770gain the resulting opus file has a way, way too high RG value. I am talking >90dB(!). Here is the metaflac output of the flac file: % metaflac --block-number=2 --list bs.1770/test.flac METADATA block #2 type: 4
2006 Jul 23
1
[PATCH] Fix a compile bug with gcc 2.95 in src/plugin_common/replaygain.c
Declaring variables in the middle of a block isn't supported by older (pre-C99?) compilers, and gcc 2.95 is one of them. --- a/src/plugin_common/replaygain.c +++ b/src/plugin_common/replaygain.c @@ -28,10 +28,11 @@ void FLAC_plugin__replaygain_get_from_fi double *track_peak, FLAC__bool *track_peak_set,
2012 Jan 07
3
Support 56kHz to 19.2kHz gain analysis
Copy additional filter values from Foobar2000 as found in <http://code.google.com/p/sirens2/source/browse/trunk/libwavpack-4.32.psp/wvgain.c?r=32> to allow metaflac to perform gain analysis on high sample rate audio. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120107/018c821b/attachment-0001.htm
2007 Jul 25
2
Bug: flac --replay-gain thinks that I used --no-padding
If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain option, I get a warning about the --no-padding option... "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with --no-padding" ...even though I'm not using --no-padding. And the file does end up with a small padding block, so changing tags is slow. I'd fixed this bug in my own copy of flac 1.1.4, but forgot to submit the
2006 Feb 19
3
Problems with gain
Hello. I have a problem here with replay gain. I use it to be able to hear all my music without any difference in volume. But it seems that all players I use ignore the gain value stored in my flac files. All flacs are louder than the gained mp3s I have. $ metaflac --show-tag=REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN <some>.flac REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-9.96 dB $ metaflac --show-tag=REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN
2005 Jun 25
1
Playback + Replay Gain questions
Thanks :D I did see that but wasn't sure if there was an option needed or how it decided to do the album gain. I fiddled with metaflac and checked for the REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN and my files seem to have it :D Suppose there is only 1 file to encode. Does FLAC still add the album gains? You Wrote: > see > http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation.html#flac_options_replay_gain >