similar to: shorewall and snort inline

Dear newfound friends, please be patient. For me reading and writing in English is more painful than dissecting IP traces :) I have tried reading through the FAQ but could not quite understand: I would like the logs to be terser. I think I can live without MAC, LEN, TOS, PREC, TTL, ID fields normally (maybe need them only in special situations). Could not understand if/how I can achieve this.

Hello Shorewall gurus, as outlined on the shorewall site I have done the following after failure to install shorewall via the rpm: I have read all of the FAQ. I have read the quickstart guide with particular attention directed at the Mandrake solution. I have searched the mailing list archives (all old replies). I have studied the documentation index. I have previous experience using shorewall

I made an atempt to run snort_inline and shorewall on the same system but I could not get snort to see the packets. Maybe someone with a little more iptables knowledge could tell me what I''m doing wrong or if its possible to have the systems setup so that it places packets that the firewall would allow into QUEUE. After setting up and starting shorewall I then issue the following

Plus I would like to let you know that it works like a charm. Snort can now see those packets. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Thibodeau, Jamie L. Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:25 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline

The second Beta is now available at: http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta Function from 1.3 that has been omitted from this version includes: 1) The ''check'' command is no longer supported. 2) The MERGE_HOSTS variable in shorewall.conf is no longer supported. Shorewall 1.4 behavior is the same as 1.3 with MERGE_HOSTS=Yes.

Is anyone using an inline IDS like hogwash or snort-inline to drop packets in a system running shoreline? I _think_ I see how to configure it, but I''d be really interested in finding a howto or something... Thanks! Mike- -- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive. -- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at

You are awesome!!!! -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Tom Eastep Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:11 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline IDS (snort-inlineorhogwash) Tom Eastep wrote: > Thibodeau, Jamie L. wrote: >

Is this possible using shorewall ? here is the setup that I need: many client computers C1 to C30 connect to the internet using ONE gateway computer server running shorewall proxy S1 client C1 connects to local LAN /shorewall proxy S1 and authenticates using username U1 S1 connects to SSH server external server ES1 authenticates using username EU1. client C1 can transfer files, upload and

I set up an ipsec/racoon vpn tunnel test environment. The gateway machines are 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 on the external adaptor and 10.0.1.1 and 10.0.2.1 internally. The test workstations are 10.0.1.10 and 10.0.2.10. The tunnel seems to be working as in 10.0.1.10 can talk to 10.0.2.10 an vice versa and they can both use the net via NAT, however 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 cannot directly

hi, we use openvpn as for our vpn endpoints and we''ve got about 70-80 vpn connections which means we have tun0 - tun80 interface. i''d like to define one zone for all of our vpn connections how can I do that? actualy our local zone is 192.168.0.0/17 (not 16) and all of the vpn''s are in 192.168.128.0/17. our should i define somehow the local zone as 192.168.0.0/16? but in

Hello, I am stumped on a problem I am having with Shorewall 2.0.1 on Mandrake 10. My setup is as follows. I have a /28 and have assiigned all ip addresses to my firewall using aliases. I am able to setup rules to allow specific traffic to specfic ip addresses on the firewall like so: ACCEPT net:w.x.y.z $FW:w.x.y.z tcp 22 This works great for TCP and UDP traffic. I can

hi all, shorewall claim that support stateful connection. But I read the document, I can''t found any configuration on it like in iptables e.g. -m -state NEW, ESTABLISHED something like like. Is shorewall by default is staeful connection for any connectione.g. web, http

Dear all, I''m setting up a new gateway for a small network (under 30 users)Gw will host the following services:shorewalldnsproxy i''m considering installing snort.can i do so on the same exact box ? is there any security risk of doing so ? box would have 4 ISPs and two internal interfaces. Any recommendation about the optimal setup of snort and shorewall (or if you suggest

Hi folks, Has anyone tested the changes to multiple ISPs/load balancing or routestopped in 2.4.0-RC1 yet? We need to talk about what criteria we will use for determining whether 2.4.0 is ready for release. I''ve started configuring a firewall at work with the multiple ISPs support, but its kernel doesn''t have connection marking support, so it''s going to be a couple of

Is it just me, or have there been an excessive number of TCP port 9200 port scans ? Port 9200 seems to be associated with WAP & Lexmark printers, but what else ? I know Tom does not like identification, but most sources seem to resolve to Asia. Is there a new Trojan loose ? An example: Oct 7 19:16:18 mybox kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT=

The problem scenario I describe was reported previously in the Shorewall lists but its resolution does not seem to have made it into the lists. Scenario: Windows XP client seeking to establish a VPN connection to a Windows 2003 Server located behind a Shorewall firewall (running on Mandrake kernel 2.4.22-37mdk). The connection cannot be made, the client reports error code 721. Discussion:

Hi All, In a scenario, where a LAN is being provided internet connectivity through multiple ISPs terminated at a Load Balanced Multihomed Linux Router as described in LARTC HowTo, how would the traffic distribution affected if there is a squid based transparent proxy for the LAN''s web traffic on the same system (i.e. the load balanced router itself). The recent squid versions have

Is my RFC1918 file obsolete? I have been assigned an ip in the 83.0.0.0/8 range, and of cource a lot of Shorewall systems drop me with a RFC1918 error. So, is my ISP actually giving me a RFC1918 IP, or am I missing something? .

i have squid running on DMZ zone and my network using ProxyARP on eth1 and eth2 mylinuxbox slackware 9.2 my network can access to internet normal, but can''t redirect to squid server from firewall. sometimes my network can connect to squid and sometimes bypass this squid server. i dont know what going on. now.. my network bypass redirect to squid server. my config file follow document

Hi, I''m new to the list, but have been through the documentation, archives, etc. looking for more info... I''ve been using shorewall 1.3.14 for a few months now, has been working well from day one. I''m also using it with dshield (submitting logs and using the block list). I''m thinking of adding snort-inline to the mix (I run apache and postfix on the same box,