similar to: decoding with -F

hi thx, exactly the explanation i wanted to hear! i want to try to damage some flac files to hear the effects on the audio, but does anybody knows if there is a program (like hex editor, ...) that could be used to visually 'search' the different blocks in the file, assuming this is even possible. if it's not, what would be a good way to damage the file in some places to be able to

If there are tens of thousands of silent samples, due to errors, then you might hear silence. However, it's more likely to be short enough to sound like a glitch. In fact, fewer erroneous samples will sound more like loud distortion than silence, depending upon the difference between the missing sample and zero. This is all assuming individual samples. What's more likely is

I just tried this with Goldwave.. it decoded the file, i edited out some stuff, and saved the file (flac format) and the tags appear to be intact. Greg M. --- Tomas Valusek <tvalusek@seznam.cz> wrote: > Hello, > > and what if I want to preserve FLAC tags while I'm > editing its contents? > Is there a way e.g. to cut silent block from FLAC > and preserve tags? By

yes I know I can do that, but my question is if there is software to edit FLAC files without having to uncompress to WAV/recompress to FLAC. 2007/7/23, Avuton Olrich <avuton@gmail.com>: > > On 7/23/07, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi > > > > does somebody know software for editing FLAC files? So I just want to > cut > > some pieces

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/25, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi > > > > I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode > it to > > WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch > > So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message > above > >

This thread has raised several good topics. It's surprising that the FLAC-Dev list has been silent for years, and now suddenly there are several good ideas to discuss. On Jan 7, 2011, at 15:04, David Richards wrote: > I am interested in streaming lossless audio, FLAC is probably the best > option for that. Currently the OggFLAC way of doing it mostly works > with a few hacks in

hi i have some small flac files and i want to concatenate to 1 big flac file, but without using ogg flac. Is this possible and how do i do this? i also was wondering if there exists a way to let the flac encoder remove audio frames of silence in the beginning and end of a wav input file when encoding? thx

hi here some questions about the md5 checksum: - what happens when the md5 checksum of the decoded audio is different of the internally stored checksum due to file corruption ? Will playing/decoding still be possible (with some error frames) or will playing /decoding be not possible at all (so all audio data is lost)? - what happens when the metadata blocks get corrupt? will the audio part

Am 07.01.2011 23:38, schrieb David Richards: > I'm also interested in another concept of lossless streaming with > flac. Lets call it broadcast flac. A problem with streaming for long > periods of time is that the sending and receiving computers clocks go > out of sync, for example even if I stream myself on localhost, with This is not a FLAC specific problem, but has to be handled

2007/10/19, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > --- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi > > > > here some questions about the md5 checksum: > > > > - what happens when the md5 checksum of the decoded audio is > > different > > of the internally stored checksum due to file corruption ? Will > > playing/decoding still be

hi does somebody know software for editing FLAC files? So I just want to cut some pieces out of the file (for example silence in front of a recording) thx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20070723/e3bc7859/attachment.htm

There is no such thing as a "silent" sample. A sample does not contain any "sound," therefore a wrong sample cannot contain either silence or a wrong sound. A sample is a snapshot of an instant in time, and one single sample doesn't tell you what was happening before or after that sample. When a speaker stops moving, you get silence. It doesn't matter

Ok, so here's the deal... I've been having a lot of trouble sleeping, so I've done some research and discovered this program called "Hemi-Sync". I decided to torrent it from the Pirate Bay to try it out before spending my money. What I torrented worked incredibly, so bought it, then torrented another Hemi-Sync program: Lucid Dreaming. It's a DVD-Audio program. What I

Hi I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode it to WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message above still decodable to WAV (and how can you do this, because flac.exe doesn't want to decode the file), even if there is a MD5 signature mismatch, or is this not possible at all? thx

Hi, I'm a FLAC beginner and I had a question. Suppose I encode my whole CD collection now in the FLAC format, using the FLAC encoder version 1.1.4 (the most recent one at this time). Will I still be able to decode all FLAC files to WAV files in the future using the latest FLAC decoder, when for example version 2.0 of FLAC (or a later version) is released or is it possible that at some point

My friend somehow managed to get a BDP-95, even though the hardware isn't scheduled to ship until March. The problem is that the manual makes no mention of FLAC, at all, and only the web page claims to support the format. Playback of flac seems to work, but files from one online vendor work flawlessly while files from other online vendors have strange glitches that sound like a

What Brian Willoughby means is that even though the future is uncertain, you may trust FLAC. The format is mature enough so that you won't see major changes preventing playback of files encoded by older encoders, but even if that comes to happen, the playback libraries on most software will be backwards-compatible, and FLAC is lossless meaning that you may convert FLAC 1.1.4 to a possible

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi Stepan, > > I would need more information to be able to investigate further. It's > legal for the decoder to output -32768, so it would be good if you could > explain how this is unexpected. Its unexpected because the decoder continues to output all samples of -32768 even when the

Hi All, We are using speex decoder only for narrow band decoding. Quite often, even though source frame is not silence, decoded audio is silence. I wonder there is a problem in the way we uses speex decoder API. Basically, we initialize speex decoder only once and just reset the decoder before we decoding another file. Do we need to intialize speex decoder and destory decoder for each audio file

hi, Is it true the flac encoder can compress music better when the complexity of the music is low? I'm compressing some tunes of old MS DOS games (pc speaker, sound blaster 16 OPL3 chip music) and I saw a *huge* compression ratio (some files where only 1/3th of the original file in filesize after compressing to flac), so I was wondering if less complex music always means better compression.