similar to: FLAC: compression silence frames

yes I know I can do that, but my question is if there is software to edit FLAC files without having to uncompress to WAV/recompress to FLAC. 2007/7/23, Avuton Olrich <avuton@gmail.com>: > > On 7/23/07, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi > > > > does somebody know software for editing FLAC files? So I just want to > cut > > some pieces

hi, Is it true the flac encoder can compress music better when the complexity of the music is low? I'm compressing some tunes of old MS DOS games (pc speaker, sound blaster 16 OPL3 chip music) and I saw a *huge* compression ratio (some files where only 1/3th of the original file in filesize after compressing to flac), so I was wondering if less complex music always means better compression.

I just tried this with Goldwave.. it decoded the file, i edited out some stuff, and saved the file (flac format) and the tags appear to be intact. Greg M. --- Tomas Valusek <tvalusek@seznam.cz> wrote: > Hello, > > and what if I want to preserve FLAC tags while I'm > editing its contents? > Is there a way e.g. to cut silent block from FLAC > and preserve tags? By

hi does somebody know software for editing FLAC files? So I just want to cut some pieces out of the file (for example silence in front of a recording) thx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20070723/e3bc7859/attachment.htm

I need it to be able to take a stream of PCM data and encode it. Right now it works if I am recording from a source (i.e. microphone or with "what you hear") but when I try to use another API (Team Speak) to capture the PCM data it doesn't seem to be encoding correctly. (I know the PCM data is correct. I am able to use it to create a wav file.) I'm also having a problem with

hi flac-dev list! I see, when compressing CD-audio tracks, I can reach up to 60% (ratio = 0.6x) of the original WAV file after compression. I was wondering if the FLAC codec could become as good as reaching 50% of the original WAV file in the future or if we are already at the (almost) maximum compression possible? thx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

hi thx, exactly the explanation i wanted to hear! i want to try to damage some flac files to hear the effects on the audio, but does anybody knows if there is a program (like hex editor, ...) that could be used to visually 'search' the different blocks in the file, assuming this is even possible. if it's not, what would be a good way to damage the file in some places to be able to

hi can the flac encoder be used to compress non-wave data? So suppose I rename a data file to *.wav, can i compress it then using the flac encoder to make it smaller? just wondering if this is possible -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20070903/b3091c47/attachment.html

Hmm, You're actually correct, when you put it that way. Because the audio blocks are coded independently, you could speed things by having the encoder (or decoder) do a little up-front processing on the metadata, then use the overall settings to divide the file into sections and run the FLAC process in parallel. However, I think it is generally frowned upon in some circles to

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:36:29PM +0100, catch-all at masklinn.net wrote: > > > now is it just a coincidence, > > It is, testing on a >6mn piece (Endless, Nameless from Nirvana's > Nevermind, 6:21) Does that track have a long period of silence in the middle? (...checks Discogs...) Nope: "Endless, Nameless" comes after 10 minutes silence after the end of

hi i have some small flac files and i want to concatenate to 1 big flac file, but without using ogg flac. Is this possible and how do i do this? i also was wondering if there exists a way to let the flac encoder remove audio frames of silence in the beginning and end of a wav input file when encoding? thx

hi is there a filesize limitation for flac files because of the encoder or decoder for some reason?

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/25, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi > > > > I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode > it to > > WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch > > So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message > above > >

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/25, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > > > --- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2007/7/25, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to > decode

"Using FLAC binary : /Users/Marcus/flac/test/../src/flac/flac Original file size 441044 bytes. Compression level 1, file size 421393 bytes. Compression level 2, file size 421393 bytes. Compression level 3, file size 373613 bytes. Compression level 4, file size 369517 bytes. Compression level 5, file size 369517 bytes. Compression level 6, file size 369517 bytes. Compression

What I'm trying to achieve is that a voicemail message should be at least 3 seconds long for it to be saved, but *after that* a prolonged silence (e.g. 10 seconds) should terminate the call and recording. My current settings (Asterisk 10.7.0 and 11.2.1) are: ; Minimum length of a voicemail message in seconds for the message to be kept ; The default is no minimum. minsecs=3 ;

Why isn't the compression level added in a metadata block by the flac encoder itself (just like the encoder version)? In this way all programs that read the file can see what compression level was used. thx 2007/7/4, Scot Thompson <scot.thompson@cox.net>: > > This has been asked many times. The answer is no. I suggest saving the > compression level into a tag for future

hi, How do i detect whether there is silence in media using speex? Is there any API which decides that the audio data only contains silence? Basically i will have PCM linear data, I want to know whether it is complete silence. Is it that during encoding speex_bits_write will return a lesser number if the audio at byte_ptr contains silence? thanx, Rahul -- Rahul Arvind Jadhav

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/27, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > > > > > > But how is it possible then the FLAC encoder allows files which > have > > > a bad > > > resulting MD5 to be encoded? Is it because of the bad ram, ... > this > > > incorrect MD5 is not detected during encoding? > > >

On Jan 3, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Josh Coalson wrote: > the FLAC parts look OK but I don't know how the audio converter > works. I think that's where the problem is. it is probably > converting float to 32-bit int full scale. well, here's what I found out about the 32-bit integer conversion. If the original 16-bit sample is 0x52F3, it goes through floating point, then comes