similar to: FLAC: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch

So I recently encoded my entire CD collection (over 7000 songs) to flac and I have found that 18 of them have a strange problem.  The files are corrupted in some way.. They will stop playing abruptly in the middle of the song.  I've attached a listing of the metadata and you'll see what I mean.  You can see that the seek points toward the end have a bunch of zeros and I'm not sure

So, let's provide some information then :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- soa2ii at thor /mnt/files/music/Slime/Alle gegen Alle $ flac -aF 02\ St?rtebecker.flac flac 1.2.1, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007 Josh Coalson flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome

As far as I can tell I've found a serious bug in the command line flac encoder :( I have created many hundreds of flac files and I was very annoyed to discover that the XMMS flac plug-in had intolerably long seek times, but since that had been mentioned on this list a bunch of times without anyone actually investigating, I thought I had better actually find the BUG which causes this. 1. I

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain > > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding > > option... > > > > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with > > --no-padding" > > > > ...even though I'm

If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain option, I get a warning about the --no-padding option... "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with --no-padding" ...even though I'm not using --no-padding. And the file does end up with a small padding block, so changing tags is slow. I'd fixed this bug in my own copy of flac 1.1.4, but forgot to submit the

When I was trying to find yesterday's xmms-plugin bug, i have noticed that seeking in stream without seek-table isn't very good. With attached patch it is much better. -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next part -------------- --- src/libFLAC/seekable_stream_decoder.c.orig 2003-02-26 19:41:51.000000000 +0100 +++ src/libFLAC/seekable_stream_decoder.c 2003-07-09 23:49:35.000000000 +0200

Ok, the patch from 2003 about improving seeking still didn't make it to CVS, so here is another try. I made some benchmarking with the test_seeking utility from flac sources to show how bad the current seeking is, especially without seektable. Track used for the experiment had about 50 minutes. In the following table is average number of seeks and number of decoded frames required for one

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/25, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi > > > > I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode > it to > > WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch > > So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message > above > >

Ok, here is a patch waiting for new CVS :). It works fine for me, but please check it before commiting... -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next part -------------- --- src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c.orig 2003-01-30 17:36:01.000000000 +0100 +++ src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c 2003-01-30 21:53:18.000000000 +0100 @@ -51,6 +51,25 @@ */ static const unsigned FLAC__BITBUFFER_DEFAULT_CAPACITY = ((65536 - 64) *

Are you sure it's not your compiler? That's the first thing I would check. I know that RedHat is famous for including broken pre-releases of GCC in their distributions since 7.0. I'd try recompiling with GCC 3 or GCC 2.95 (available as "kgcc"). -- Asheesh. On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Nick Lamb wrote: > As far as I can tell I've found a serious bug in the command line

Here you are: soa2ii at thor /mnt/files/music/Slime/Alle gegen Alle $ metaflac --list 02\ St?rtebecker.flac METADATA block #0 type: 0 (STREAMINFO) is last: false length: 34 minimum blocksize: 4608 samples maximum blocksize: 4608 samples minimum framesize: 14 bytes maximum framesize: 15637 bytes sample_rate: 44100 Hz channels: 2 bits-per-sample: 16 total samples: 5857656

Hi all, As people may have seen there's a pre-release here: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ Specifically: flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit binaries Please test. I'm particularly interested in hearing about the windows binaries which were cross compiled from Linux to Windows. Unfortunately there is a bug

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/25, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > > > --- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2007/7/25, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to > decode

hi here some questions about the md5 checksum: - what happens when the md5 checksum of the decoded audio is different of the internally stored checksum due to file corruption ? Will playing/decoding still be possible (with some error frames) or will playing /decoding be not possible at all (so all audio data is lost)? - what happens when the metadata blocks get corrupt? will the audio part

2007/10/19, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > --- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi > > > > here some questions about the md5 checksum: > > > > - what happens when the md5 checksum of the decoded audio is > > different > > of the internally stored checksum due to file corruption ? Will > > playing/decoding still be

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/27, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > > > > > > But how is it possible then the FLAC encoder allows files which > have > > > a bad > > > resulting MD5 to be encoded? Is it because of the bad ram, ... > this > > > incorrect MD5 is not detected during encoding? > > >

yes I know I can do that, but my question is if there is software to edit FLAC files without having to uncompress to WAV/recompress to FLAC. 2007/7/23, Avuton Olrich <avuton@gmail.com>: > > On 7/23/07, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi > > > > does somebody know software for editing FLAC files? So I just want to > cut > > some pieces

On 9/6/07, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > it's really not complicated I think: only api changes to write on any Please get started writing a patch, immediately. -- avuton -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:31:21PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > yes, a mere 2 years later it is checked in! > > speed improvement for me is roughly 17% testing flac files on > linux-i386. Thanks! In case you would like to check another old patch, I have attached updated patch for seekable stream decoder, originally posted on 09/07/2003. -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next

hi, I don't know if this message belongs on the mailing list, so sorry if it is not for this mailing list. I was wondering if somebody knows a player for Pocket PC (windows mobile 2003) that can play FLAC files on the Pocket PC. thanks in advance! Harry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: