similar to: Encoding Options

for the "best" compression: --super-secret-totally-impractical-compression-level takes forever on my system (athlon 2500+) and sometimes results in larger files. so i just stick with -8 -V --lax --no-padding. -V to ensure the encode was vail --no-padding to save a few more bytes, as "The encoder writes a PADDING block of 4096 bytes by default." though 4kb over 3000 tracks

Thanks for the reply! > for the "best" compression: > > --super-secret-totally-impractical-compression-level Are there any more secret options? > takes forever on my system (athlon 2500+) and sometimes results in > larger files. so i just stick with -8 -V --lax --no-padding. Took about 20 minutes for a 3 minute long file on my old 900MHz laptop, not too impractical in

Hi. I'm trying to encode some high sample rate music (88.2kHz) into flac. When trying this with flac 1.1.4 I get the following error: ##### keithr@eng:~$ work/flac-1.1.4/src/flac/flac Serenissima02.wav <snip copyright> Serenissima02.wav: WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample=24 Serenissima02.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'fact'

Hi Josh, On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 22:41, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Marek Peteraj <marpet@naex.sk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i'd like to ask what the best options are for safe 24bit 96kHz > > archiving. Currently i'm only using -8 but there are also some other > > options like block size etc. Can anyone suggest? > > I haven't heard of

Early this past week, Miroslav Lichvar suggested for me: > Ok, you need 0.04% improvement, that should not be a problem. Try > flac --lax -e -p -l 32 -r 10 --no-padding Thank you again, Miroslav. I tried that, and it took almost two full days (surprisingly, Windows ME stayed up that long without crashing) to re-encode the entire set on my 266-MHz machine. After all, in the help file

Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > Ok, you need 0.04% improvement, that should not be a problem. Perhaps a little more than that, since the sizes I listed were after stripping out the padding and all metadata blocks except SEEKTABLE and STREAMINFO. > Try flac --lax -e -p -l 32 -r 10 --no-padding > and if it is not enough, increase -r up to 16. Thank you. I'll do that. What, though,

Hi all, i'd like to ask what the best options are for safe 24bit 96kHz archiving. Currently i'm only using -8 but there are also some other options like block size etc. Can anyone suggest? Also i'd like to ask whether a no-lax 192kHz mode is planned in flac, seems like 192kHz isn't directly supported although flac can compress such rate in lax mode. My last question - is there

severity 196556 minor thanks On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 12:06:56PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:09:20PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > I ran a simple test to try to reproduce your problem, and I happened to grab > > one wav file which had a sampling rate of 4660 and was able to reproduce > > your problem. flac works fine on the other files, which

If processing time is not a big factor -- say, I could put up with four to six times the duration of compressing at -8 -- what command-line settings could one use to get even more compression? I have a case where the FLACs encoded at -8 are about 653.3 MB, but the set comes with artwork whose jpegs are 50.5 MB (I tried zipping the jpegs, realizing it would do very little, and the zip file

Martin Leese wrote: > > At: > http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_tools_flac.html#flac_options_exhaustive_model_search > > it states, "If the max LPC order is high this > can significantly increase the encode time." > This suggest that if the max LPC order is low > then using -e will not be slow. > ---- That brings up another question then... What

--- Marek Peteraj <marpet@naex.sk> wrote: > Hi all, > > i'd like to ask what the best options are for safe 24bit 96kHz > archiving. Currently i'm only using -8 but there are also some other > options like block size etc. Can anyone suggest? I haven't heard of anyone using FLAC for 192khz, so you'll probably just have to experiment. when you have some

(I am not on this list, please CC me manually if necessary) On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:47:15PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > Are you sure it's not your compiler? That's the first thing I would > check. I know that RedHat is famous for including broken pre-releases of > GCC in their distributions since 7.0. FUD. Please stop that, it makes you look unprofessional. Until you can

Am building sieve plugin on AIX. This is revision 1095:8010f1eb66b3. I see the following error when doing the build: rm -fr .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax^M mkdir .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax^M rm -fr .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax/libsieve.a^M mkdir .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax/libsieve.a^M (cd .libs/lib90_sieve_plugin.lax/libsieve.a && ar x /usr/sadmin/src/

I've tried everything with the * box after this weekend. I have read every document on the problems people are having with them after this weekend as well, but none of them address my problem. I checked my settings in my sips which I have below as well, I have changed the host file a few times, but this was new to me and I never had modified it before. I have and the same results

First, Thank you for your answers. I using the following code to try simply decode a flac file and write the decoded data raw PCM file. The resulting file is just noise and pops, so is the decoded data in a different format than PCM? struct flacData { FILE *inputFile; FILE *outputFile; char *filename; }; FLAC__StreamDecoderReadStatus flac_DecoderReadCallback(const FLAC__StreamDecoder

Op ma 14 okt 2024 om 16:06 schreef Stefan Oltmanns <stefan-oltmanns at gmx.net>: > > Unfortunately that doesn't seem to be the case. I just made a capture > that is > 30 Minutes with total samples set to 0 and a seek table: All > players I tried cannot seek in the file and cannot determine it's > length: VLC, Celluloid and DeaDBeef > > I wondered why I can

I am getting the following error when trying to install an application that should launch a java application: I did set my display to the localhost:0.0 but to no avail. Stack Trace: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Unknown Source) at java.awt.Toolkit$2.run(Unknown Source) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native

Hi all, A few (possibly dumb) questions about decoding.. 1. Is it possible to know the total size of FLAC metadata blocks in advance? Do I really need to parse all metadata blocks until I see the METADATA_BLOCK_HEADER with last-metadata-block == 1? 2. Is there a generally accepted best-practice for seeking if there is no seektable present in the file? The format states *"It is possible to

Hello, i am trying to install "Middle School Success Essentials" from Topics Education, on my 0.9.28 wine installation, which works OK with some MS progs. The initial (unpacking?) progress bar completes and then i get the error below, without any recourse. Does anyone have any ideas? (FWIW, the error is shown in the installer box when you click on the "Details" button). TIA

On 10/13/07, Wayne Davison <wayned@samba.org> committed: > Added Files: > detect-renamed-lax.diff > Log Message: > My version of Matt's --trust-rename patch. The option --detect-moved should be named --detect-moved-lax because it contains the lax behavior. --detect-moved would mean "use a file with the same basename as an alternate basis". Matt