Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "two problems with flac and ices 0.4 build"
2006 May 10
1
RE: Compile error on PPC linux
/usr/bin/ld: bad -rpath option
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [libFLAC.la] Error 1
--- flac-1.1.2/src/libFLAC/Makefile.in.orig    2005-02-04 
21:23:37.000000000 -0500
+++ flac-1.1.2/src/libFLAC/Makefile.in    2006-04-30 20:30:00.000000000 
-0400
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@
       rm -f "$${dir}/so_locations"; \
     done
 libFLAC.la: $(libFLAC_la_OBJECTS)
2005 Jan 10
3
liboggflac1 soname
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:37:18PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:
> as far as I can piece together, the last releases went like:
> 
> FLAC release   libOggFLAC went to
> -------------  ------------------------------------------
> 1.1.0          1:2:0 from 1:1:0 (code changes only I think)
> 1.1.1-beta1    2:0:1 from 1:2:0 (some i'faces added, some changed)
> 1.1.1         
2005 Feb 11
2
liboggflac1 soname
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote:
> As such it's an incompatible change, for which you should also
> zero the 'age' field. So 1.1.1-beta1 should have been 2:0:0,
> not 2:0:1.
[...]
> Yes, I agree. The numbering is all about coexisting installs of the 
> various versions.
Ok.  I need to know what to do about this... is 1.1.2 with fixed sonames
just around the
2005 Jan 29
2
Patch : fix configure.in and Makefile.am problems.
Note : I'm subscribed to the list. Please don't CC replies to me.
Hi all,
I am trying to compiler current CV head on a PowerPC G3 Debain system.
Debian test has automake 1.9 which is a little more stringent about 
errors than 1.8. The following patch has the following fixes.
 0) Remove AC_CANNONIAL_HOST because it has already been invoked 
    earlier
 1) Make sure
2011 Oct 12
1
yum repo problem?
5.7 32bit server system (headless coloc server), long running, long time 
stable.  I need the flac utils...
[root at freescruz ~]# rpm -qa |grep flac
(nothing installed)
[root at freescruz ~]# yum install flac-devel
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
  * base: mirror.5ninesolutions.com
  * extras: mirror.grikare.com
  * rpmforge: apt.sw.be
  *
2005 Feb 11
1
liboggflac1 soname
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:22:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> liboggflac FROM THE 1.0.4 RELEASE has version-info 0:1:0
> liboggflac FROM THE 1.1.1 RELEASE has version-info 2:1:1
Well, the packages we are having trouble here are:
  flac 1.1.0  (let me check... libOggFLAC version-info 1:2:0)
    debian package: liboggflac1 (matches
2007 Oct 17
1
Fwd: Re: FLAC for "ARM little endian for glibc"
On Thursday 04 October 2007 04:27:47 you wrote:
> Sir, you need to provide more information.  What kind of errors?  What
> is not working?  What exactly are you trying to do?  What compiler are
> you using?
H IV0, 
we are using a lot of different cross-compiler (mainly based on GCC 3.4.x)
When I tried to cross-compile FLAC for non-i386 platforms (such as ARM), I use
use
2004 Sep 10
1
Patch for building on IRIX
Not sure if this is the right place to post this...
I have attached a patch for the build system which lets FLAC build on IRIX and
Cygwin.
-------------- next part --------------
? Makefile
? aclocal.m4
? autom4te.cache
? config.guess
? config.log
? config.status
? config.sub
? configure
? depcomp
? install-sh
? irix.patch
? libtool
? libtool-disable-static
? ltmain.sh
? missing
? mkinstalldirs
?
2004 Sep 10
1
flac-1.1.0: libtool warnings
Hi,
And thanks for flac.  There's a minor problem when compiling flac:
libtool warns about mixing up shared and static libraries. Typical
messages are:
*** Warning: Linking the shared library libxmms-flac.la against the
*** static library ../../src/plugin_common/libplugin_common.a is not portable!
*** Warning: Linking the shared library libxmms-flac.la against the
*** static library
2005 Jan 08
4
liboggflac1 soname
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:03:28AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> *AND*  there is a major problem with liboggflac1.
> 
> liboggflac1 did not change the soname (better check this, it might require a
> soname change, check the seekable ogg-flac support stuff).
CCing upstream on this.  Josh, did 1.1.1 change interfaces in liboggflac?
If so, it needs a soname change.
>
2004 Sep 10
3
Compiling problem flac 1.0.4 Mandrake 9.0 gcc 3.2
Hi,
I just read the thread about making 3dnow optimisations default and thought I would test it as I have an AMD here.
Unfortunately I can not even compile with default (no 3dnow) options.
./configure goes fine including this part:
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no
creating libtool
checking for g++... no
checking for
2004 Sep 10
3
getting framesize in client
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:39:52PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:
> --- Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix.inf.upol.cz> wrote:
> > I have few notes:
> > 
> > It seems there is changed API in CVS again. So, what about adding
> > function like
> > 	unsigned FLAC__format_frame_size(const FLAC__Frame *frame)
> > which returns size of the frame in bytes. This
2004 Sep 10
2
getting framesize in client
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 07:12:35PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:
> Yeah, it's useful, so now there is a
> FLAC__seekable_stream_decoder_get_decode_position() and
> FLAC__file_decoder_get_decode_position().  I haven't documented
> them yet but you can see an example in
> src/metaflac/operations_shorthand_seektable.c where I use it
> during seektable creation.
Ok, here is
2004 Sep 10
0
FLAC 1.0.4 beta released
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:11:24PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote:
> I have just finished uploading the source release for FLAC 1.0.4 beta
> to Sourceforge; there are no binary releases.  See the included
> doc/html/news.html for the changes since 1.0.3; there are quite a few.
> 
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.4_beta-src.tar.gz?download
I just downloaded 1.0.4 beta,
2004 Sep 10
2
FLAC joins Xiph
It's official:
  http://xiph.org/ogg/flac.html
It's OK to keep submitting patches but I'm going to hold off
on integrating anything until CVS is moved over.  Note that
codec code (libFLAC, libFLAC++, libOggFLAC, libOggFLAC++) will
be covered under Xiph's BSD-like license from here on out.
Josh
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus -
2002 Sep 11
1
patch for FLAC
Hey,
Sesse asked me to do a patch to the auto* set-up to allow for FLAC to be 
added.
The patch touches configure.in and oggenc/Makefile.am
It is disabled by default, use --enable-flac as an arg to configure
to enable it.
You might want to maybe add more checks, since FLAC's API tends to change 
more than is good for anyone ;)
Hope that helps,
Thomas
-- 
The Dave/Dina Project : future
2004 Oct 09
1
Ogg encapsulation...
I'm about to do the new version of the ogg mapping and i have a few 
questions...
Here's my understanding so far...
There's a new first header... which is a header like the other ogg 
headers... with some general info, and with a stream info metadata block 
stuck to the end of it.
The next packet must be a vorbis comment meta data block, then meta data 
blocks in any order and of
2005 Jan 10
0
liboggflac1 soname
OK, I'm coming to this a little late (been sick) but I'll try
to answer all in one mail:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:31:47PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > liboggflac1 did not change the soname (better check this, it
> might require a
> > soname change, check the seekable ogg-flac support stuff).
> 
> CCing upstream on this.  Josh, did 1.1.1 change interfaces in
2004 Sep 10
5
FLAC 1.0.4 beta released
All,
I have just finished uploading the source release for FLAC 1.0.4 beta
to Sourceforge; there are no binary releases.  See the included
doc/html/news.html for the changes since 1.0.3; there are quite a few.
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.4_beta-src.tar.gz?download
Please beat up on this as much as possible in the next week or two and
try and turn up bugs.  Here's a
2005 Feb 11
1
liboggflac1 soname
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Is the debian mismatch based on a release between these too? Should 
> > flac-1.1.1 release have been 2:1:0? In either case, it seems rebuilding 
> > all the packages against the 1.1.1 library should resolve the issue?
Well, if something built against 1.0.4 can (even in corner cases)
malfunction with 1.1.1, then yes, it must be