similar to: [Flac-users] How to make paragraph seperations in the Tag Config. > Comments field?

This is a fantastic selling point, and one that I've never really thought of. Back in the early days of etree (a whole three years ago ;) ), before we learned the virtues of MD5 sums for SHN downloads, I downloaded a Hornsby show from someone. Of course, an MD5 wasn't available, but when I decompressed and Shoren didn't throw a sanity error my way, I figured all was well. I burned

First, thanks to everyone for putting in their time to make the first truly "free" lossless audio codec. I'm co-founder of etree.org, the largest online community of lossless audio traders (currently 12,000 active members). We have been living in the shadow of Shorten for almost three years. Shorten, as most of you have come to realize, is extremely limited in terms of

First of all, this is my first post so please go easy if I'm a little off-topic. Just let me know nicely off-list. Thanks! As Mike already knows, I am currently trying to develop a plug-in for playing Shorten files over Audion on the Macintosh platform. When I proposed this to him to get some information on contacting the right people, he mentioned you guys and I need a little info.

Great info. I found some descriptions of st5 (md5 fp) and ffp, where I assume that "fp" is just a Taper abbreviation for "fingerprint" - or signature as it's called in the flac header. However, I could not find these utilities or source code. What I found looked like instructions for a gui-based program. I think it would be easier to support Mac if st5 were

I am interetsed to know views on how does best quality ogg compression compare with SHN or whether this is this really comparing apples with oranges because SHN does not compress that greatly? I am on a Music list that is doing a Tape Tree. I guess Grateful dead have made SHN the cult leader format. -- Raena Lea-Shannon --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg

Great call, Jason. The trouble may also be from overclocking their CPU's. We ran into some similar bug reports in the Furthur project with people swearing up and down that random application hangs and glitches was our software (which in part it was). However, as soon as they brought their CPU's and video cards back to spec, their problems magically went away. I would follow this one up

--- "Paino, Christopher L YN1(AW) (CPF N0084)" <PainoCL@cpf.navy.mil> wrote: > If I am understanding FLAC correctly, the internal MD5 sum is (or can > be > )different than the fingerprint file sum. Yes. > The internal sum can be > different > depending on which compression settings are used, while the audio > remains > unchanged. It's the other way

According to http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html#metadata_block_streaminfo : "FLAC supports from 4 to 32 bits per sample. Currently the reference encoder and decoders only support up to 24 bits per sample. " This is why I'm confused. I though one of the benefits of FLAC was it's ability to encode in word lengths longer than 16 bits. MW -----Original Message----- From:

My comments: ;) >hmm, I'm thinking we could >spec out an ETREE metadata >block that you could use. Yes, I think this is a good idea. I'd like to incorporate this a s much as possible as the "FLAC Standard" if it's OK with you guys, since ideally FLAC will be the etree.org format of choice, replacing Shorten. >> Filesize compressed >> >this is

Pyxml/xmlproc is being used in tools/xen/xm/xenapi_create.py but is unmaintained for several years now. xmlproc is used only for validating XML documents against a DTD file. This patch replaces the pyxml/xmlproc based XML validation with code based on lxml, which is actively maintained. Signed-off-by: Stephan Peijnik <spe@anexia.at> diff -r 6e0ffcd2d9e0 -r 7082ce86e492

shntool (http://etree.org/shnutils/, http://shnutils.freeshell.org/) is Windows-only, but the source is available. > Great info. I found some descriptions of st5 (md5 fp) and ffp, where I > assume that "fp" is just a Taper abbreviation for "fingerprint" - or > signature as it's called in the flac header. However, I could not find > these utilities or source

I know this is probably a really stupid question, but why is FLAC's MD5 checksum different than the MD5 checksum of the original (input) .wav? I was under the impression that since each FLAC file contains metadata that can be changed without changing the audio (thus changing the MD5 checksum of that FLAC file) that the checksum of the original .wav file would instead be used. If that's

Hi, How's the testing going? I compressed 194 individual .wav files (totaling 8.54GB) which contained tracks ripped from many varied albums. I unflacced them and compared their md5 signature with the same from the original .wav. They were all perfect. I didn't use the -V option just in case of any chance of mis-reporting. I hope to test it with the complete collection of ~41GB

I posted the bug at http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=130992&group_id=13478 . Since all my other discs were encoding fine I thought that the wav file may be corrupt/invalid/or something. I opened them with cool edit and "saved as"ed them to my drive. These files encoded fine and the extraced/converted files have the correct md5sum. Is there a program that can

I've found a wav of an entire album that shorten compresses better than flac. Is this supposed to be possible? wav 388,374,044 flac-6 239,109,203 shn 236,457,697 Cheers. Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Academic Information Services, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 5936 Fax: +44 161 295 5888

> > I found a bug with FLAC v0.6 raw encoding. It > appears that the file > > pointer in the source file is not reset after > seeking to the end for > > checking the size. I've attached a patch. > > What's the impact? Do I have bad .flac files? > If you are piping raw samples in, no. The bug only occurs when you give an input file AND use -fr. In that

--- Pisco <pisco@mac.com> wrote: > This may clarify a few things. I compiled flac from the source > package > on flac.sourceforge.net since the Darwin package did not contain the > XMMS > plugin. I compiled it using the ./configure, make, make all > sequence, > and it compiled fine. > When the flac plugin is alone in the XMMS Input directory, it works >

Which plugins do you mean? I thought I remember Winamp, for instance, being able to do word-length reduction on the fly. The only place I can find this feature is in the Monkey's Audio codec plugin, though. Anyway, great news Josh! Thanks for making 24-bit audio support in FLAC a priority. :) MW On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Mike Wren <mikew@etree.org>

Hi! Sorry my late answer. I did run the sysvolcheck/reset commands and everything seems fine. On my server I use the following rpm packages, installed from the tranquil.it repository. ldb-tools.x86_64 2.0.10-1.el7?????????????????? @samba_custom libldb.x86_64?????????????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom libldb-devel.x86_64???????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom

I installed the beta version of oneiric and got this error: root@g4-01:~# xm new Unexpected error: <type ''exceptions.ImportError''> Please report to xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/xen-4.1/bin/xm", line 8, in <module> main.main(sys.argv) File