Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Flac-users] Re: detecting encoding parameters?"
2004 Sep 10
1
Winamp3 Player Plugin error
The Winamp3 hit the streets yesterday, so i gave the FLAC Winamp3 plugin a
shot (dragged cnv_flacpcm.wac to the Wacs/ directory, yadda yadda) and
received the following error message when starting Winamp3:
---
Studio.exe - Entry point Not Found
The procedure entry point_chkesp could not be located in the dynamic link
library MSVCRTD.dll.
--
It's unable to play .flac files, but still plays
2007 Oct 17
2
Re: flac fingerprint
2007/10/15, David W. Tamkin <dattier@panix.com>:
>
> Harry,
>
> > so i was wondering what advantages it could give me to make a ffp
> > file, because there is already a internally stored md5 checksum on the
> > decoded audio data inside the flac file?
>
> Testing the .flac file against its internally stored fingerprint lets
> you know that you have a
2011 Apr 06
2
Compiling ices0.4 from source
Guys, i have icecast2 running on an opensuse 11.3 64 bit os.
unfortunately, opensuse comes with ices2 which only does ogg streaming - - >
hence my need for ices0.4
i got the source and ran ./configure . there was lots of console output and
in the end i saw;
.Features:
XML : yes
Python : yes
Perl : yes
LAME : yes
Vorbis : yes
MP4 : yes
FLAC : yes
Then i did
2011 Oct 13
1
Problem with Ices
2013 Mar 17
1
Patch to remove the dead in_flac project from the MSVC solution
Solution file still contained the removed in_flac project causing
unnecessary errors on load.
-------------- next part --------------
--- FLAC.sln.orig Wed Mar 13 18:23:38 2013
+++ FLAC.sln Sat Mar 16 19:14:43 2013
@@ -57,14 +57,6 @@ Project("{4cefbc7c-c215-11db-8314-080020
{4cefbc89-c215-11db-8314-0800200c9a66} = {4cefbc89-c215-11db-8314-0800200c9a66}
EndProjectSection
EndProject
2008 Dec 11
1
Possible (bug) in winamp in_flac.dll decoder
> The best approach would be for you to report this bug directly to the
> developers of the WinAmp FLAC decoder, and also electriQ.
Also postet it to the developers of electriQ, but it's a closed source
project and there's not much activity in their forum,
so i'm not sure if anybody is fixing this very soon.
Furthermore I think the problem is more likely in the Winamp2 Flac
2008 Dec 11
1
Possible (bug) in winamp in_flac.dll decoder
> The best approach would be for you to report this bug directly to the
> developers of the WinAmp FLAC decoder, and also electriQ.
Also postet it to the developers of electriQ, but it's a closed source
project and there's not much activity in their forum,
so i'm not sure if anybody is fixing this very soon.
Furthermore I think the problem is more likely in the Winamp2 Flac
2008 Dec 10
2
Possible (bug) in winamp in_flac.dll decoder
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post my problem to, i'm not a
developer but a user experiencing
a possible bug in the flac decoder.
using winamp 2.81 + in_flac.dll (tryed different versions eg 1.12 and 1.21)
+ Electri Q Winamp DSP plugin (all versions affected)
Winamp crashes just before flac track ends (next track is also flac track)
does NOT crash when playing mp3
2012 Mar 29
4
[GIT PULL] Assorted bugfixes and improvements (from openSUSE)
The following changes since commit b78d8e4db10e57b8d82bb82e4e3662d5dedd7255:
FLAC__bitmath_ilog2,FLAC__bitmath_ilog2_wide,COUNT_ZERO_MSBS: add gcc
specific optimizations (2012-03-28 15:43:48 -0300)
are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/crrodriguez/flac.git master
for you to fetch changes up to 3a060556772c5d6a6464afddfda7c3ad2f93a306:
Remove winamp2 plugin.
2004 Sep 10
1
Winamp3 component update
Okay, I've done a bit of work on flacpcm.cpp and the Winamp3 component
workspace. I updated the workspace & projects to use the SDK for build
488 (based on GenericWACTemplate). I also fleshed-out the MediaInfo
callbacks, so that standard Vorbis comment fields are reported (author,
album, genre, date/year, title, track, description), although id3 tag
info takes precedence. So flac
2004 Sep 10
0
[Flac-users] viewing the fingerprint?
--- "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@panix.com> wrote:
> An enthusiastic FLAC user on another list to which I subscribe said
> that FLAC
> has a function to display on screen the stored fingerprint that a
> FLAC file
> has of its source WAV. That sounds wonderful, because it allows a
> user to see
> whether two differing FLAC files might come from the same WAV but
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] more front-end trouble
Two wavs I tried to encode tonight got errors near their ends, saying
something like "skipped unknown sub-chunk 'LIST'." These occurred at 97% into
one file and 98% into the other. If I hadn't brought the DOS command window
to the foreground and hadn't been at the monitor watching before these
warnings were scrolled away by the displays from work on other files in the
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] Re: Fingerprint Verification Problem
--- "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@panix.com> wrote:
> Our Leader asked,
>
> | In any case, if you run flac -t and it passes, the only extra
> | information you get from comparing the MD5 sum to the text
> | file is to know if the original seeder put the right text file
> | together with the right FLAC file. But if you don't need the
> | contents of the text
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] directing flac -t output to a file
This may be more a question about the pseudo-DOS command line than about flac
itself, but at this point I don't really know.
How can one direct the output of flac -t to a file instead of the screen?
Often I'd like to verify a large number of flac files, and Speek's front-end
is very good for writing up the batch file for that (flac -t itself doesn't
seem to expand wildcards on
2004 Sep 10
2
[Flac-users] my flac -t issue: next approach
If one is running flac under Windows and invoking it at a command.com prompt,
does flac -t return an exit status that command.com can use to determine its
next move (such as logging whether the flac file being tested passed or
failed)?
Meanwhile, I discovered the pause command; by editing that into the batch file
between invocations of flac -t, at least I won't miss any results before they
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] Re: test vs. verify
When I asked,
| > If you're going to run flac -t later to test
| > the .flac file, isn't it redundant to have verification on during
| > encoding?
Fearless Leader Ace Coalson responded,
| yep.
OK.
| > If you know ... that -V was used
| > during encoding and that flac reported "Verify OK," is there any
| > reason to test the file?
| nope, unless you suspect
2004 Sep 10
0
[Flac-users] questions about 1.1.0 release
--- "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@panix.com> wrote:
> First, as long as you don't use the --cuesheet option when you
> encode, are
> .flac files encoded by 1.1.0 still readable by earlier versions?
that's right.
> Second, if the old default for seekpoints was -S100x and the new one
> is -S10s,
> does that mean that, if you encode a 44.1-ksps WAV that was
2004 Sep 10
0
[Flac-users] Re: questions about 1.1.0 release
--- "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@panix.com> wrote:
> Thank you very much for the explanations, Josh.
>
> | the seekpoints are not the only places in the stream that can
> | be seeked to, they are just hints about regular locations in
> | the stream. you can still seek to any sample. the number of
> | seekpoints are just one factor in determining how fast the
>
2004 Sep 10
2
[Flac-users] new stripping options
So the right way to do it -- it seemed to work when I tried it, at least -- is
metaflac --remove-all --dont-use-padding filename.flac
?
I guess that these features make it more imperative than ever to watch the
timestamps and not to validate a FLAC with an MD5 that is older than the FLAC
is.
2004 Sep 10
2
[Flac-users] Re: settings for tighter compression than -8?
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> Ok, you need 0.04% improvement, that should not be a problem.
Perhaps a little more than that, since the sizes I listed were after
stripping out the padding and all metadata blocks except SEEKTABLE and
STREAMINFO.
> Try flac --lax -e -p -l 32 -r 10 --no-padding
> and if it is not enough, increase -r up to 16.
Thank you. I'll do that. What, though,