Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "[Flac-users] Fwd: AudioReQuest Now with FLAC"
2004 Sep 10
0
Fwd: AudioReQuest Now with FLAC
More good news; I added an item on the home page about it.
Josh
--- Steven Vasquez <steve@request.com> wrote:
> From: "Steven Vasquez" <steve@request.com>
> Subject: AudioReQuest Now with FLAC
>
> Josh,
>
> Its official, the ReQuest Multimedia (www.request.com) released its
> latest firmware 1.8.1 for the AudioReQuest music servers which now
>
2004 Sep 24
0
dropping id3 support
ah. I was only talking about removing support in the winamp2
and xmms plugins. the decoder libraries will still be able to
skip over/ignore id3 tags as before. I think AudioReQuest and
PhatNoise must be using their own code to read id3 tags, which
won't be affected.
Josh
--- Steve Vasquez <steve.vasquez@request.com> wrote:
> Hey Josh,
>
> We currently use id3 v1/2 in the
2004 Sep 10
4
Streaming With Flac
We have FLAC support on our AudioReQuest products, and we allow
streaming from our built-in web server for MP3s, but can not get Flac
working. Does anyone know a Windows based player that will play FLAC
streams?
I have tried the Winamp plug-in for FLAC (even updated it to 1.1.0), but
streaming is not working. We use embedded id3 tags instead of Flac
comments if this means anything. Thanks
2004 Sep 10
0
Re: Streaming With Flac
Steven Vasquez wrote:
> We have FLAC support on our AudioReQuest products, and we allow
> streaming from our built-in web server for MP3s, but can not get Flac
> working. Does anyone know a Windows based player that will play FLAC
> streams?
Try http://corecodec.org/projects/coreflac and any DirectShow based
player ( like WMP 6.4 ) , but i dont know if Toff had the time already
2004 Sep 10
0
Streaming With Flac
--- Steven Vasquez <steve@request.com> wrote:
> We have FLAC support on our AudioReQuest products, and we allow
> streaming from our built-in web server for MP3s, but can not get Flac
> working. Does anyone know a Windows based player that will play FLAC
> streams?
>
> I have tried the Winamp plug-in for FLAC (even updated it to 1.1.0),
> but
> streaming is not
2004 Sep 28
0
dropping id3 support
Hey Josh,
We currently use id3 v1/2 in the AudioReQuest but are working to support
Vorbis Comments in a future version. I do know that PhatNoise and Tag and
Rename both use id3 as well. Just an FYI, you have to do what you have to
do.
Steven Vasquez
Director of Product Marketing/Founder
ReQuest Multimedia
steve@request.com
-----Original Message-----
From: flac-dev-bounces@xiph.org
2004 Sep 10
2
Should FLAC join Xiph?
--- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote:
> * Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote:
> > I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get
> > away with until tonight:
> >
> > --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote:
> > > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address:
> > >
> > >
2004 Sep 24
6
dropping id3 support
after spending a lot of time integrating X-Fixer's winamp2
plugin code, I am on the verge of removing id3 v1/v2 support
from the plugins completely. it is really hard to get right
in a way that works intuitively for the user, and i18n is
also a nightmare. in id3v2 every field can have a different
encoding.
FLAC tag a.k.a. Vorbis comment support is very good now so
unless someone comes up
2004 Sep 10
2
Should FLAC join Xiph?
I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get
away with until tonight:
--- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote:
> The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address:
>
> 1. Will Ogg FLAC become the default manifestation of the FLAC codec?
> If not, why not? What does Ogg not offer that makes it worth having
> two different file
2005 Jan 06
0
FLAC and ID3
--- Ron Cococcia <ron.cococcia@request.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed
> recently
> with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and
> was
> wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog)
> is
> that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags.
>
> I'm
2005 Jan 06
1
FLAC and ID3
> ID3 support was only dropped in the plugins. libFLAC still can
> decode FLAC files that have ID3 tags (v1 or v2). it just ignores
> them and there are no plans to change that in the future.
OK, that's what I thought, but wanted to be sure. I've been updating
some metadata handling routines in our application and heard something
about this and was curious.
> the spec
2001 Jan 19
1
Opportunity for Ogg/Vorbis in hardware...
Guys... I'm not subscribed to the list, but I've been reading your
archives for about a year, watched the progress, the push to Beta 1,
and been, frankly, in awe of some of the hard topics all of the
extremely intelligent people who have been tackling. (I'm not too up
on my fractal compression and using splines to track pixel motion in a
stream.)
Ok, that said, I was speaking with
2004 Sep 10
2
FLAC joins Xiph
It's official:
http://xiph.org/ogg/flac.html
It's OK to keep submitting patches but I'm going to hold off
on integrating anything until CVS is moved over. Note that
codec code (libFLAC, libFLAC++, libOggFLAC, libOggFLAC++) will
be covered under Xiph's BSD-like license from here on out.
Josh
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus -
2005 Jan 06
2
FLAC and ID3
Hello,
I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed recently
with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and was
wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) is
that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags.
I'm curious because I have been using ID3 tags with FLAC (I store extra
data such as album art with my media files,
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] Problems with configure
I compiled flac today and at first I didn't succeed very well. The
binary was built and all, but each time I tried encode a wav-file, the
only result was:
> flac 1.0.4, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002 Josh Coalson
> flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are
> welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type `flac' for details.
>
>
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] How do I encode a FLAC with tags?
Just finally getting around to this :-) I've never used abcde...looks
like it'll be a winner in my book....just to understand...your patch
(which does tagging) is against the original and only FLAC patch that
enables abcde to do flac which is v1.9.9 and the newest is 2.0.3? or do
I just patch your new patch against 2.03? Yeah I know I should just try
it (and I'm sure I will) I
2008 Dec 04
0
Bad mime type reported for flac file
Eric,
I believe that ID3 tags are not legal for FLAC, but they are
accommodated. ID3 tags are supposed to be for MP3 only. The Linux
"file" utility is probably finding ID3 tags and making a reasonable
assumption that this is an MP3.
I don't tag my FLAC files, so I do not know what to suggest. Perhaps
there are some clues in the FLAC documentation on what are proper tag
2004 Sep 10
1
FLAC 1.0.5 beta1 released
make check > out 2> err
bzip2 out
bzip2 err
Oh, look, errors. Huh. Check the end of "out" for details.
-- Asheesh.
--
What the world *really* needs is a good Automatic Bicycle Sharpener.
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I have an Athlon Thunderbird 1Ghz sitting running all alone in my dorm
> room while I'm at home for six weeks. I figure I'll run
2004 Sep 10
0
[Flac-users] Using Grip with FLAC
I looked around on the web, but I found no guidance on this subject, so
I'm guessing. Here is what I came up with. It appears to work on a
limited sample of CDs. Can anyone comment on whether or not this
is OK?
My system is Mandrake 9.0. My Grip is 3.0.1 (as supplied with
Mandrake 9.0)
My flac is 1.1.0, built from the source tarball. Mandrake ships
with 1.0.3, which does not appear to have
2004 Sep 10
0
Should FLAC join Xiph?
* Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote:
> I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get
> away with until tonight:
>
> --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote:
> > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address:
> >
> > 1. Will Ogg FLAC become the default manifestation of the FLAC codec?
> > If not, why