similar to: [Flac-users] Fwd: AudioReQuest Now with FLAC

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "[Flac-users] Fwd: AudioReQuest Now with FLAC"

2004 Sep 10
0
Fwd: AudioReQuest Now with FLAC
More good news; I added an item on the home page about it. Josh --- Steven Vasquez <steve@request.com> wrote: > From: "Steven Vasquez" <steve@request.com> > Subject: AudioReQuest Now with FLAC > > Josh, > > Its official, the ReQuest Multimedia (www.request.com) released its > latest firmware 1.8.1 for the AudioReQuest music servers which now >
2004 Sep 24
0
dropping id3 support
ah. I was only talking about removing support in the winamp2 and xmms plugins. the decoder libraries will still be able to skip over/ignore id3 tags as before. I think AudioReQuest and PhatNoise must be using their own code to read id3 tags, which won't be affected. Josh --- Steve Vasquez <steve.vasquez@request.com> wrote: > Hey Josh, > > We currently use id3 v1/2 in the
2004 Sep 10
4
Streaming With Flac
We have FLAC support on our AudioReQuest products, and we allow streaming from our built-in web server for MP3s, but can not get Flac working. Does anyone know a Windows based player that will play FLAC streams? I have tried the Winamp plug-in for FLAC (even updated it to 1.1.0), but streaming is not working. We use embedded id3 tags instead of Flac comments if this means anything. Thanks
2004 Sep 10
0
Re: Streaming With Flac
Steven Vasquez wrote: > We have FLAC support on our AudioReQuest products, and we allow > streaming from our built-in web server for MP3s, but can not get Flac > working. Does anyone know a Windows based player that will play FLAC > streams? Try http://corecodec.org/projects/coreflac and any DirectShow based player ( like WMP 6.4 ) , but i dont know if Toff had the time already
2004 Sep 10
0
Streaming With Flac
--- Steven Vasquez <steve@request.com> wrote: > We have FLAC support on our AudioReQuest products, and we allow > streaming from our built-in web server for MP3s, but can not get Flac > working. Does anyone know a Windows based player that will play FLAC > streams? > > I have tried the Winamp plug-in for FLAC (even updated it to 1.1.0), > but > streaming is not
2004 Sep 28
0
dropping id3 support
Hey Josh, We currently use id3 v1/2 in the AudioReQuest but are working to support Vorbis Comments in a future version. I do know that PhatNoise and Tag and Rename both use id3 as well. Just an FYI, you have to do what you have to do. Steven Vasquez Director of Product Marketing/Founder ReQuest Multimedia steve@request.com -----Original Message----- From: flac-dev-bounces@xiph.org
2004 Sep 10
2
Should FLAC join Xiph?
--- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > * Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote: > > I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get > > away with until tonight: > > > > --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > > > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > > > > >
2004 Sep 24
6
dropping id3 support
after spending a lot of time integrating X-Fixer's winamp2 plugin code, I am on the verge of removing id3 v1/v2 support from the plugins completely. it is really hard to get right in a way that works intuitively for the user, and i18n is also a nightmare. in id3v2 every field can have a different encoding. FLAC tag a.k.a. Vorbis comment support is very good now so unless someone comes up
2004 Sep 10
2
Should FLAC join Xiph?
I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get away with until tonight: --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > 1. Will Ogg FLAC become the default manifestation of the FLAC codec? > If not, why not? What does Ogg not offer that makes it worth having > two different file
2005 Jan 06
0
FLAC and ID3
--- Ron Cococcia <ron.cococcia@request.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed > recently > with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and > was > wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) > is > that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags. > > I'm
2005 Jan 06
1
FLAC and ID3
> ID3 support was only dropped in the plugins. libFLAC still can > decode FLAC files that have ID3 tags (v1 or v2). it just ignores > them and there are no plans to change that in the future. OK, that's what I thought, but wanted to be sure. I've been updating some metadata handling routines in our application and heard something about this and was curious. > the spec
2001 Jan 19
1
Opportunity for Ogg/Vorbis in hardware...
Guys... I'm not subscribed to the list, but I've been reading your archives for about a year, watched the progress, the push to Beta 1, and been, frankly, in awe of some of the hard topics all of the extremely intelligent people who have been tackling. (I'm not too up on my fractal compression and using splines to track pixel motion in a stream.) Ok, that said, I was speaking with
2004 Sep 10
2
FLAC joins Xiph
It's official: http://xiph.org/ogg/flac.html It's OK to keep submitting patches but I'm going to hold off on integrating anything until CVS is moved over. Note that codec code (libFLAC, libFLAC++, libOggFLAC, libOggFLAC++) will be covered under Xiph's BSD-like license from here on out. Josh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus -
2005 Jan 06
2
FLAC and ID3
Hello, I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed recently with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and was wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) is that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags. I'm curious because I have been using ID3 tags with FLAC (I store extra data such as album art with my media files,
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] Problems with configure
I compiled flac today and at first I didn't succeed very well. The binary was built and all, but each time I tried encode a wav-file, the only result was: > flac 1.0.4, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002 Josh Coalson > flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are > welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type `flac' for details. > >
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] How do I encode a FLAC with tags?
Just finally getting around to this :-) I've never used abcde...looks like it'll be a winner in my book....just to understand...your patch (which does tagging) is against the original and only FLAC patch that enables abcde to do flac which is v1.9.9 and the newest is 2.0.3? or do I just patch your new patch against 2.03? Yeah I know I should just try it (and I'm sure I will) I
2008 Dec 04
0
Bad mime type reported for flac file
Eric, I believe that ID3 tags are not legal for FLAC, but they are accommodated. ID3 tags are supposed to be for MP3 only. The Linux "file" utility is probably finding ID3 tags and making a reasonable assumption that this is an MP3. I don't tag my FLAC files, so I do not know what to suggest. Perhaps there are some clues in the FLAC documentation on what are proper tag
2004 Sep 10
1
FLAC 1.0.5 beta1 released
make check > out 2> err bzip2 out bzip2 err Oh, look, errors. Huh. Check the end of "out" for details. -- Asheesh. -- What the world *really* needs is a good Automatic Bicycle Sharpener. On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > I have an Athlon Thunderbird 1Ghz sitting running all alone in my dorm > room while I'm at home for six weeks. I figure I'll run
2004 Sep 10
0
[Flac-users] Using Grip with FLAC
I looked around on the web, but I found no guidance on this subject, so I'm guessing. Here is what I came up with. It appears to work on a limited sample of CDs. Can anyone comment on whether or not this is OK? My system is Mandrake 9.0. My Grip is 3.0.1 (as supplied with Mandrake 9.0) My flac is 1.1.0, built from the source tarball. Mandrake ships with 1.0.3, which does not appear to have
2004 Sep 10
0
Should FLAC join Xiph?
* Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote: > I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get > away with until tonight: > > --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > > > 1. Will Ogg FLAC become the default manifestation of the FLAC codec? > > If not, why