similar to: [Flac-users] troubles with 1.0.3 beta4 front-end

Two wavs I tried to encode tonight got errors near their ends, saying something like "skipped unknown sub-chunk 'LIST'." These occurred at 97% into one file and 98% into the other. If I hadn't brought the DOS command window to the foreground and hadn't been at the monitor watching before these warnings were scrolled away by the displays from work on other files in the

On Mittwoch 09 Mai 2001 02:53, you wrote: > > > first I should say that it MIGHT not be because the file is > > > large. the wave reader in flac is pretty rudimentary and if there > > > is any sub chunk between the wave header and data sub chunk flac > > > will give you that error. could you inspect the wav file to see > > > if that's the case?

So let me get this straight... I can put a CD in my computer and copy it to my hard drive as a wav files. Then by using FLAC to "compress" said wavs into .flac files. Resulting in approx. half the file size. Then later I can convert the FLAC files back to wav and the end up with the EXACT wav file I had before ? If this is the case, then great, but can you really cut out half the

Hello, I have found that there are some WAV files which have a "fmt" chunk size greater then 16 bytes (length indicator greater then 16). The patch is attached. What is the normal method for submiting patches? Regards, Chris Wolf <HR NOSHADE> <UL> <LI>application/octet-stream attachment: audio.c.patch </UL> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

on this topic... i configured and built 1.0.4 in osx 10.2. seemed to build fine, but each time i attemped to use the newly compiled flac binary I received this error "bus error" i nabbed the binaries for 1.0.3 and, each time i use flac to compress something in tests, i receive this error when it is done compressing a file: "WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk

I'd be happy to (help) port the source to Java. How many lines of code are we talking? If preferable, I could just do a front-end to a JNI interface to flac. -Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Coalson [mailto:xflac@yahoo.com] > > --- "Cracauer, David D." <dcracauer@vue.com> wrote: > > Are there any plans for flac for java (JNI or

On 10/18/2002 12:50 PM, Josh Coalson wrote: >> i configured and built 1.0.4 in osx 10.2. seemed to build fine, but each time >> i attemped to use the newly compiled flac binary I received this error >> >> "bus error" > > not sure about this one. > >> i nabbed the binaries for 1.0.3 and, each time i use flac to compress >> something in

Hi all, Lots of bugs and support requests in the sourceforge tracker are related to the FLAC frontend, which is bundled with FLAC for Windows with the installer. However, I couldn't find it in git. I really thought the FLAC frontend was part of the project, but it seems it is some piece of freeware last updated 10 years ago: http://members.home.nl/w.speek/index.htm Is this true? Anyone

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz.sig This release fixes a memory corruption bug related to MODSEQ handling in earlier v1.2 releases. Memory corruption means that it's a security bug and possibly exploitable. MODSEQ code is new in v1.2, so v1.1 and older releases are not affected. Other than that, there

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz.sig This release fixes a memory corruption bug related to MODSEQ handling in earlier v1.2 releases. Memory corruption means that it's a security bug and possibly exploitable. MODSEQ code is new in v1.2, so v1.1 and older releases are not affected. Other than that, there

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz.sig Lots of fixes since beta3, but apparently there are still a few bugs left: - Is SORT working? - APPEND seems to have problems in some setups. - Still some SEARCH TEXT problems? Or Squat indexing problems? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

I am unable to get 2.0.beta4 to compile. I get the following errors: /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-slackware-linux/4.3.3/../../../../lib64/libwrap.a(hosts_access.o): In function `host_match': hosts_access.c:(.text+0x625): undefined reference to `yp_get_default_domain' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [tcpwrap] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory

Does the 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso contain only usr/share/doc, or for some reason i am unable to see anything else? I was looking for usr/src (and for a odd chance to have usr/ports); i suppose those two trees would be available somewhere on some disc for RELENG_6_1. I mounted the image as ... mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /path/to/6.1-BETA4-i386-disc2.iso -u 0 mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt ...

Hi, I tried to compile asterisk-1.8.0-beta4 but after ./configure && make I've got following error: [CC] res_fax.c -> res_fax.o [LD] res_fax.o -> res_fax.so [CC] res_fax_spandsp.c -> res_fax_spandsp.o res_fax_spandsp.c:117: error: field ?fax_state? has incomplete type res_fax_spandsp.c:118: error: field ?t38_state? has incomplete type res_fax_spandsp.c: In function

Hi all, Were there encoder differences between beta4 and 1.0rc1? A precompiled oggenc for Windows identifies itself as beta4, and from a certain mono file produces 53.3 kb/s files, whereas one I've compiled myself, identifying itself as 1.0rc1, produces 55.9 kb/s. Is this a feature or a bug? Also, all the links to images at the top of: http://www.vorbis.com/download_win.psp are broken.

Hi, Some of you may recall that I got the VP3 decoder working with the xine multimedia player some time ago and posted a patch for anyone else to try. I really messed up when I did that since I generated the patch against some random CVS snapshot of xine-lib. I did better this time and generated the patch against the latest release of xine-lib (1.0-beta4, released today). If you

Hello, I hope you won't mind if I give you mine opinion and suggestions about Vorbis audio encoder, especially new version. I was pretty satisfied with the quality of Beta4 encoder. For a bitrates around 112 to 128 kb/s I consider it better then any other audio compression formats (MP3, AAC, ...) at same bitrate. Sound quality that this version produces with bitrates below 112 kb/s was not

Hi! I would like to share with you an interesting test result. I re-encoded a song 10 times (the 2. made from the 1., the 3. made from the 2.,... the 10. made from the 9.), with a beta4 (CVS 20010620) and with an RC2 (CVS 20010817) library version, 256 kbit/s mode, channel coupling disabled at RC2. The beta4 is very good at the 10. encoding too, but the RC2 has some interesting quality bugs. So,

Using kmail with PLAIN authentication worked fine with beta3 but trying it with beta4 authentication fails. This is because kmail sends "username \0 username \0 password" in the authorization token and the new code to call auth_request_set_login_username() when supplied an authid must be returning failure (certainly commenting this code out returns to the beta3 behaviour of

I've upgraded to latest Thunderbird client and recompiled latest dovecot source repository code and this problem still persists. I have two accounts which I've been transferring email between for months. Now when I attempt this the following loop begins and the only way to stop it is to restart both Thunderbird and dovecot. Let me know how to Oct 23 07:53:49 net1 dovecot: imap-login: