similar to: [OT] Tidy of Wiki Sidebar

On August 9, 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Martin Leese wrote: ... >> Should Speex and CMML be removed from >> the Wiki Sidebar > Don't remove Speex - it's still very much in use. > > We probably want to add Daala to the list of video codecs: > https://wiki.xiph.org/Daala > > We probably want to remove CCML from the

I have been tidying up the VorbisComment page in the XiphWiki. The problem with it was that it was a mixture of proposals and discussion of those proposals. This made it difficult for implementers to see what to implement. The problem section is: http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/VorbisComment#New_ENCODER_field_name_proposal This is a mess, and all I could do was add attributions to the

Brendan Bolles wrote: > Hey everyone, according to Wikipedia's 4-year-old information, there is no > standard for putting metadata into an Ogg file. True. > That metadata must be > included in the codec. More generally, in a stream in the Ogg file. Codecs are streams, but so are things like Ogg Skeleton. Information about Metadata has been collected together in the Xiph Wiki

On 7/23/13, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 Jul 2013 15:17, "Martin Leese" <martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> > wrote: ... >> Information about Metadata >> has been collected together in the Xiph Wiki >> at: >> https://wiki.xiph.org/Metadata > > That page is a bit outdated. It has CMML in it which we

Hi, I have posted this three times to the flac-dev, vorbis-dev, and ogg-dev mailing lists. I wanted to see what code there was currently to support Ambisonics. So I downloaded the code from the xiph download page for libogg-1.1.3, libvorbis-1.1.2, vorbis-tools-1.1.1 and flac-1.1.4, but wasn't able to find anything. If it exists then I missed it, so could somebody please point me to it.

On 10/25/18, Rodger Combs wrote: > >> On Oct 25, 2018, at 12:47, Martin Leese <martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> >> wrote: ... >> An alternative approach is to only define >> popular layouts. For more obscure layouts, >> such as 2.1 and Mid/Side, assume that the >> person doing the encoding knew what they >> put in, and so knows what will come

"Kurosawa, Taku" wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > Sorry for the late reply again, > The application we are preparing this time is not exactly similar to > Replaygain. > > Replaygain as we understand is something which normalize the loudness at > content provider side, but our application takes different approach. It is > designed to normalize the loudness at player

uans <engineering at wwrn.net> wrote: > I was looking at the wiki's sites and I came across some to the effect > of OggOCM. Is this already implemented in Ogg. How can I get some more > information on how to access it. I don't believe anyone has yet implemented it. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web:

Rodger Combs wrote: > I've run into some issues using Opus with source files in channel layouts > other than the default 8. For instance, 2.1 isn't supported, so I have to > either downconvert to 2.0 or upconvert to 5.1 (which usually involves adding > empty channels, which prevents the playback device from upconverting to the > native layout). > To address this,

Hi All, On the Xiph Wiki page at: https://wiki.xiph.org/MIME_Types_and_File_Extensions I added Opus to several of the sections, but wasn't sure whether to add "Theora + Opus" to: .ogv - video/ogg .axv - video/annodex As far as I can tell, according to the Opus FAQ at: https://wiki.xiph.org/OpusFAQ#Will_Opus_replace_Vorbis_in_video_files.3F Theora + Opus is

Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+xiph@mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Martin Leese wrote: > > So what is "OggPCM"? I started this thread > > because I was puzzled why someone was > > changing a draft instead of the document > > itself. > > The original OggPCM was started by a person who really didn't > lnow what they were doing and wouldn't listen to

Not sure if this belongs here or in flac-dev. I am subscribed to both, so flop it over if fits better over there. Looking at the Changelog for FLAC 1.2.1 (17-Sep-2007), it says: "With the new --keep-foreign-metadata in flac, non-audio RIFF and AIFF chunks can be stored in FLAC files and recreated when decoding." Where can I find more detail on what is a

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Martin Leese <martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:42:04 -0700 Subject: To: flac-dev at xiph.org Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Can someone please remove this moron > spammer [Gourav Tewatia] from this list. And also delete their four posts from the archive (otherwise the SPAM links will be picked up by search

Shayne Wissler <wissler at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a program that is given a random file and needs to determine > whether it is Vorbis or FLAC. For Vorbis, there are various places > where I can infer that I have a bad stream. But for FLAC, when I call > either FLAC__stream_decoder_process_until_end_of_metadata or > FLAC__stream_decoder_process_single, it searches the

Bastiaan Timmer wrote: ... > In a > previous message I mentioned writing some more convenience functions, but on > closer inspection they would either be inefficient or very difficult > to implement. Could you briefly list these, in case somebody else wants to have a go. Many thanks, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web:

" Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves " <justivo at gmail.com> wrote: ... > To be fair, only the Vorbis users requested albumart. FLAC users > should in theory be able to use the tag too if they want, but this > wouldn't be something we'd see in other codecs like Speex and Theora. This is a minor point, but FLAC users can already do this using METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE (which

Ralph Giles <giles at thaumas.net> wrote: > On 5 March 2012 01:51, Silvia Pfeiffer <silvia at silvia-pfeiffer.de> wrote: >> I've started the following wiki page: >> https://wiki.xiph.org/Chapter_Extension > > Not webvtt-style '-->' timestamp separators? :) ... > We should also trim leading and trailing whitespace. Silvia Pfeiffer <silvia at

Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > Recently I made some recordings (44.1kH/24bit WAV), and after > post-processing (normalization, noide reduction) I saved them as flac (still > 44.1kHz/24bit). > I noticed that ogg123 can decode these, but it will output 24 bit only. > Specifically there's no option to transform the output to 16bit. > When trying to pipe the 24bit WAV output

lvqcl wrote: > Martin Leese wrote: >> Note that the channel order may not be defined. > > IMHO it doesn't matter in this place of documentation (which describes > default channel assignments for FLAC). Your proposed wording was: 0000-0111 : (number of independent channels)-1. The channel order follows SMPTE/ITU-R recommendations. The assignments are as follows: The

Hi All, I wasn't sure whether to send this to the Opus list or to a Vorbis list. Even though it concerns Vorbis Comments, the latter seem dead, so I went with the former. The Matroska people have published a draft of Container Tag Specifications; visit: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cellar-tags-15.html Does Xiph want to make use of this, perhaps by making the tags