similar to: adwantages of ogg container?

On 2010-08-27, Ralph Giles wrote: >> My question to you, What advantages has ogg vs matroska. > > They're both free containers, and there isn't a significant > performance difference, so either one works from a free media > perspective. [...] Personally I would add the following points/bullets: * Ogg has a lesser semantic burden, so that e.g. embedded

On 2010-08-27, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Doing one thing seem to be good reason. User normally see just file > name say bla.ogg or bla.mkv . [...] Yes, that might be a benefit as well. But an unexpected one: in well-designed and matched protocol environments, if you expect to see some array of differing protocols, you will also see an easy way of discerning those protocols from each

Am Freitag, den 27.08.2010, 20:51 +0300 schrieb Sampo Syreeni: > On 2010-08-27, Ralph Giles wrote: > > >> My question to you, What advantages has ogg vs matroska. > > > > They're both free containers, and there isn't a significant > > performance difference, so either one works from a free media > > perspective. [...] > > Personally I would

Sampo Syreeni <decoy at iki.fi> wrote: ... > [I]n > well-designed and matched protocol environments, if you expect to see > some array of differing protocols, you will also see an easy way of > discerning those protocols from each other. Before engaging in any sort > of decoding endeavor. > > File names, resource fork types or IFF/RIFF block types do not seem to > be

Hey everyone. If you haven't seen this already, last week was Google I/O the third edition. The event page is : http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/ The youtube channel with the keynotes is : http://www.youtube.com/googledevelopers One of the most interesting things at that conference was the introduction of the WebM codec, which is a combination of On2's VP8 video codec (which is now

Am Samstag, den 28.08.2010, 01:01 +0300 schrieb Sampo Syreeni: > On 2010-08-27, Alexey Fisher wrote: > > > Doing one thing seem to be good reason. User normally see just file > > name say bla.ogg or bla.mkv . [...] > > Yes, that might be a benefit as well. But an unexpected one: in > well-designed and matched protocol environments, if you expect to see > some

On 08/29/2010 06:16 PM, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Are there any options to recover > video with missing header? Or tip for archiving, for example make some > recorevable stream with backup header? If the whole first portion of the file is missing, then regenerating the header is, in the abstract, a hard problem involving searching a very large solution space. In practice, many encoders

Both MPEG-4 File Format (mp4) and Matroska (mkv) have an interesting format for lyrics and subtitles. Since these container formats can contain multiple contain streams, lyrics or subtitles are just another "stream" interleaved with the rest of the data. They are synchronized by having timestamps like any other stream. The payload is just text data. If you don't care about

FYI, Unless you've been checking the FLAC site you might have missed some encouraging things that have happened in the last few months. I haven't really been announcing things in the lists along the way, but to summarize: - Primus and Phish have been selling soundboard recordings of shows in FLAC - Magnatune (an indie label) offers their whole catalog in FLAC and Vorbis now - More

FYI, Unless you've been checking the FLAC site you might have missed some encouraging things that have happened in the last few months. I haven't really been announcing things in the lists along the way, but to summarize: - Primus and Phish have been selling soundboard recordings of shows in FLAC - Magnatune (an indie label) offers their whole catalog in FLAC and Vorbis now - More

Hi all, Xiph aims at developing open-standards media formats. Though xiph.org tells about vorbis/theora/flac/speex, nothing is mentioned about container to use (that is ogg/ogm). I have a few questions Is there a difference between ogg and ogm? I guess its only the extension that is different and everything else is same. Some tools (like ogmtools) are available to create ogm files. What is

Hello , We are using Icecast for few years in a small french radio station with great success ! ( hitting 60 simultaneous listeners sometimes :-) ) http://www.radiogalere.org:8080/ Now we plan to stream the webcam capture of the studio, we 've done a test with Ogv/theora @128kb video with great sucess although none of the HTML5 browser wher able to keep on playing the stream after few

http://www.matroska.org/ I just found out about this and I think it looks like a great idea. I figured some on this list would be interested. Also, speaking now without having reviewed matroska in detail, nor being involved in Ogg/Vorbis: Perhaps it would be a viable alternative for the Ogg format for Theora if nothing else. I read about the .ogg format a while back, and while I have no

Hi all, And cc'ing flac-dev. > On May 10, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Dave Rice <dave at dericed.com> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > >> On May 10, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Andrew James Weaver <weevz at uw.edu <mailto:weevz at uw.edu>> wrote: >> >> Hello all! >> >> In a previous discussions on this list about people interested in working on the FLAC

Hi, I haven't seen any information about Lyrics in the documentation and mail archives, so I guess the answer... but may be I've missed something... Does flac support lyrics? Regards, J?r?me

Please allow me to announce the creation of a new open source Media Container Format, named 'matroska' Project page is here http://sf.net/projects/matroska ; homepage is http://matroska.sourceforge.net , HTML should be online soon. Steve 'robux4' LHomme and myself have left the MCF project because of incompatibilities of our work with the project goals defined by the founder of

Please allow me to announce the creation of a new open source Media Container Format, named 'matroska' Project page is here http://sf.net/projects/matroska ; homepage is http://matroska.sourceforge.net , HTML should be online soon. Steve 'robux4' LHomme and myself have left the MCF project because of incompatibilities of our work with the project goals defined by the founder of

Le dimanche 30 janvier 2011 03:54:10, michel memeteau a ?crit : > Is there some evolution on Webm support, does it need a lot of changes > in Libshout for example ? or does the code structure of icecast makes > it easy to add new containers/codecs ? Well the interesting question is: "Is webm streamable?". I don't know much about it nut webm is wrapped into a matroska-based

Hello all! (cc-ing the flac-dev list) I would like to give an update as to the recent CELLAR work on the FLAC specification. • Work has been done to make internal and external links more accurate and reliable. • 'Rice Coding' has been clarified as 'Exponential Golomb Coding.' • Clarifications have been made for binary representation. • Typos and other small changes have been

On 2007-12-30, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > In any format that is to be used on both, it is always better to pick > one and stick with it. Then recommend one single format. Nobody *has* to support all of the features present, yet it makes sense to *allow* common variances. Most of all, because: > Unless you can guarantee that you're writing streams that are only > going to