similar to: adwantages of ogg container?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "adwantages of ogg container?"

2010 Aug 27
4
adwantages of ogg container?
On 2010-08-27, Ralph Giles wrote: >> My question to you, What advantages has ogg vs matroska. > > They're both free containers, and there isn't a significant > performance difference, so either one works from a free media > perspective. [...] Personally I would add the following points/bullets: * Ogg has a lesser semantic burden, so that e.g. embedded
2010 Aug 27
3
adwantages of ogg container?
On 2010-08-27, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Doing one thing seem to be good reason. User normally see just file > name say bla.ogg or bla.mkv . [...] Yes, that might be a benefit as well. But an unexpected one: in well-designed and matched protocol environments, if you expect to see some array of differing protocols, you will also see an easy way of discerning those protocols from each
2010 Aug 27
0
adwantages of ogg container?
Am Freitag, den 27.08.2010, 20:51 +0300 schrieb Sampo Syreeni: > On 2010-08-27, Ralph Giles wrote: > > >> My question to you, What advantages has ogg vs matroska. > > > > They're both free containers, and there isn't a significant > > performance difference, so either one works from a free media > > perspective. [...] > > Personally I would
2010 Aug 28
0
adwantages of ogg container?
Sampo Syreeni <decoy at iki.fi> wrote: ... > [I]n > well-designed and matched protocol environments, if you expect to see > some array of differing protocols, you will also see an easy way of > discerning those protocols from each other. Before engaging in any sort > of decoding endeavor. > > File names, resource fork types or IFF/RIFF block types do not seem to > be
2010 May 22
2
The new WebM codec
Hey everyone. If you haven't seen this already, last week was Google I/O the third edition. The event page is : http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/ The youtube channel with the keynotes is : http://www.youtube.com/googledevelopers One of the most interesting things at that conference was the introduction of the WebM codec, which is a combination of On2's VP8 video codec (which is now
2010 Aug 29
0
adwantages of ogg container?
Am Samstag, den 28.08.2010, 01:01 +0300 schrieb Sampo Syreeni: > On 2010-08-27, Alexey Fisher wrote: > > > Doing one thing seem to be good reason. User normally see just file > > name say bla.ogg or bla.mkv . [...] > > Yes, that might be a benefit as well. But an unexpected one: in > well-designed and matched protocol environments, if you expect to see > some
2010 Aug 29
2
adwantages of ogg container?
On 08/29/2010 06:16 PM, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Are there any options to recover > video with missing header? Or tip for archiving, for example make some > recorevable stream with backup header? If the whole first portion of the file is missing, then regenerating the header is, in the abstract, a hard problem involving searching a very large solution space. In practice, many encoders
2009 Sep 01
2
Flac and lyrics
Both MPEG-4 File Format (mp4) and Matroska (mkv) have an interesting format for lyrics and subtitles. Since these container formats can contain multiple contain streams, lyrics or subtitles are just another "stream" interleaved with the rest of the data. They are synchronized by having timestamps like any other stream. The payload is just text data. If you don't care about
2004 Sep 10
2
[Flac-users] FLAC in the news
FYI, Unless you've been checking the FLAC site you might have missed some encouraging things that have happened in the last few months. I haven't really been announcing things in the lists along the way, but to summarize: - Primus and Phish have been selling soundboard recordings of shows in FLAC - Magnatune (an indie label) offers their whole catalog in FLAC and Vorbis now - More
2004 Sep 10
2
[Flac-users] FLAC in the news
FYI, Unless you've been checking the FLAC site you might have missed some encouraging things that have happened in the last few months. I haven't really been announcing things in the lists along the way, but to summarize: - Primus and Phish have been selling soundboard recordings of shows in FLAC - Magnatune (an indie label) offers their whole catalog in FLAC and Vorbis now - More
2004 Jul 06
13
OGG/OGM media container
Hi all, Xiph aims at developing open-standards media formats. Though xiph.org tells about vorbis/theora/flac/speex, nothing is mentioned about container to use (that is ogg/ogm). I have a few questions Is there a difference between ogg and ogm? I guess its only the extension that is different and everything else is same. Some tools (like ogmtools) are available to create ogm files. What is
2011 Jan 30
4
Any roadmap on WebM Support ?
Hello , We are using Icecast for few years in a small french radio station with great success ! ( hitting 60 simultaneous listeners sometimes :-) ) http://www.radiogalere.org:8080/ Now we plan to stream the webcam capture of the studio, we 've done a test with Ogv/theora @128kb video with great sucess although none of the HTML5 browser wher able to keep on playing the stream after few
2003 May 04
2
Matroska as an alternative to Ogg (container)
http://www.matroska.org/ I just found out about this and I think it looks like a great idea. I figured some on this list would be interested. Also, speaking now without having reviewed matroska in detail, nor being involved in Ogg/Vorbis: Perhaps it would be a viable alternative for the Ogg format for Theora if nothing else. I read about the .ogg format a while back, and while I have no
2017 May 12
2
[Cellar] FLAC Markdown
Hi all, And cc'ing flac-dev. > On May 10, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Dave Rice <dave at dericed.com> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > >> On May 10, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Andrew James Weaver <weevz at uw.edu <mailto:weevz at uw.edu>> wrote: >> >> Hello all! >> >> In a previous discussions on this list about people interested in working on the FLAC
2009 Aug 31
4
Flac and lyrics
Hi, I haven't seen any information about Lyrics in the documentation and mail archives, so I guess the answer... but may be I've missed something... Does flac support lyrics? Regards, J?r?me
2004 Sep 10
3
Project Announcement : New Media Container Format 'matroska'
Please allow me to announce the creation of a new open source Media Container Format, named 'matroska' Project page is here http://sf.net/projects/matroska ; homepage is http://matroska.sourceforge.net , HTML should be online soon. Steve 'robux4' LHomme and myself have left the MCF project because of incompatibilities of our work with the project goals defined by the founder of
2004 Sep 10
3
Project Announcement : New Media Container Format 'matroska'
Please allow me to announce the creation of a new open source Media Container Format, named 'matroska' Project page is here http://sf.net/projects/matroska ; homepage is http://matroska.sourceforge.net , HTML should be online soon. Steve 'robux4' LHomme and myself have left the MCF project because of incompatibilities of our work with the project goals defined by the founder of
2011 Jan 31
0
Any roadmap on WebM Support ?
Le dimanche 30 janvier 2011 03:54:10, michel memeteau a ?crit : > Is there some evolution on Webm support, does it need a lot of changes > in Libshout for example ? or does the code structure of icecast makes > it easy to add new containers/codecs ? Well the interesting question is: "Is webm streamable?". I don't know much about it nut webm is wrapped into a matroska-based
2017 Jun 06
3
[Cellar] FLAC Markdown
Hello all! (cc-ing the flac-dev list) I would like to give an update as to the recent CELLAR work on the FLAC specification. • Work has been done to make internal and external links more accurate and reliable. • 'Rice Coding' has been clarified as 'Exponential Golomb Coding.' • Clarifications have been made for binary representation. • Typos and other small changes have been
2008 Feb 13
3
OggPCM: support for little-endianness only?
On 2007-12-30, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > In any format that is to be used on both, it is always better to pick > one and stick with it. Then recommend one single format. Nobody *has* to support all of the features present, yet it makes sense to *allow* common variances. Most of all, because: > Unless you can guarantee that you're writing streams that are only > going to