similar to: SELinux startup issue on FC4...

Hi! Am 09.04.20 um 10:07 schrieb Rob Kampen: [...] > I too had fail2ban fail after an otherwise successful yum update. Mine occurred in Feb when my versions of firewalld etc were updated to the versions you show. Thus far I have not had the opportunity to sort the problem. Lockdown has been quite busy so far, hopefully some slower times coming next week. Yeah, those pesky real-life biological

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 14:06, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > On Feb 26, 2020, at 08:52, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > > > >> Le 26/02/2020 ? 11:51, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit : > >> SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python2.7 from read access on the file > disable. > >> ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence)

On Feb 26, 2020, at 08:52, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > >> Le 26/02/2020 ? 11:51, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit : >> SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python2.7 from read access on the file disable. >> ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ***** >> If you believe that python2.7 should be allowed read access on the disable file by default.

Hey guys, I've been getting some strange selinux messages after the 5.3 upgrade. It appears as though my mail system (postfix) is constantly trying to access the rpm database? Here's the audit messages (I tend to look at my selinux messages using audit2allow < /var/log/audit.log as I find it easier to read quickly): allow postfix_postdrop_t rpm_t:tcp_socket { read write }; allow

I am using Puppet 3.1.0 on a CentOS 6.3 machines. The puppet master and puppet agents use CentOS 6.3 as their OS. I have a puppet script (init.pp file for the puppet module) that contains the following exec type: exec { "postgres init": cwd => "/applications/module", command => "bash initializePostgres.sh", user => "postgres", group =>

CentOS 7.5, and on one system, I'm getting: setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail from read access on the file disable_ipv6 ll -Z shows -rw-r--r--. root root system_u:object_r:sysctl_net_t:s0 /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6 I find this peculiar. Anyone have a resolution, or is this a bug? mark

Hi, total newbie on CentOS. Just firing up an install of 5.5 on a development webserver. Installed Webmin, Awstats, PHPMyAdmin and Drupal successfully. Yet to work on Sendmail and Samba. SELinux in enforcing mode, reporting "SELinux preventing ifconfig (ifconfig_t) "read write" to /var/webminsessiondb.pag (var_t)". Googled the error message without real success in finding fix

On 13/04/20 1:30 pm, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 4/9/20 6:31 AM, Andreas Haumer wrote: > ... >> I'm neither a fail2ban nor a SELinux expert, but it seems the >> standard fail2ban SELinux policy as provided by CentOS 7 is not >> sufficient anymore and the recent updates did not correctly >> update the required SELinux policies. >> >> I could report this

At the risk of angering the crash Gods, my sustem has NOT crashed again since I downgraded the kernel from 2.6.18-1.2239.fc5 to 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5. Given that newfound stability, and my lack of time, I'm going to put on hold any further diagnostics, until the next kernel revision is released. I have submitted a report at bugzilla.redhat.com (bug 218128). (Ah, nuts; accidentally created a

Hi, Some time ago I had SELinux problems with Fail2ban. One of the users on this list suggested that it might be due to the fact that I'm using a bone-headed iptables script instead of FirewallD. I've spent the past few weeks getting up to date with doing things in a more orthodox manner. So currently my internet-facing CentOS server has a nicely configured NetworkManager, and

Hi! I have a server running CentOS 7.7 (1908) with all current patches installed. I think this server should be a quite standard installation with no specialities On this server I have fail2ban with an apache and openvpn configuration. I'm using firewalld to manage the firewall rules. Fail2an is configured to use firewalld: [root at server ~]# ll /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/ insgesamt 12

I want to put the document root for an application on a separate paritition that has more space. When I try to configure this I can't access the files in the new location. I've got the SELinux attributes set on the directory and its files, so I'm thinking it's something about the parent path that SELinux doesn't like, but I don't know where that's handled. My

Hola, Estoy visualizando una serie temporal para determinar sus órdenes ARIMA y no consigo lo siguiente: ¿Cómo puedo sacar la ACF de los retardos múltiplos del periodo? Es decir, sólo ver en el gráfico ACF los retardos 12, 24, 36... Gracias!! David [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Sorry all, this is the missing email that I referred to previously. I inadvertently sent it only to the original poster rather than the list. Sorry for the wasted b/w for those who don''t care... Ed W -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LARTC] RED/GRED implementation for InBound Traffic Control (from ISP) Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 22:04:30 +0100 From: Ed Wildgoose