similar to: Header for Kate category

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Header for Kate category"

2008 Jun 17
0
Header for Kate category
What is Language-Category being used for? Conrad mentioned HTTP headers, which is where the naming scheme for Skeleton came from. Is there any fields in the HTTP headers that would be more appropriately named for your needs? Also, the "X-" naming will make it really safe, because you can choose those at will. The others are more "standard"... Cheers, Silvia. On Mon, Jun 16,
2008 Feb 15
2
Skeletal relations
On 15-Feb-08, at 10:11 PM, Conrad Parker wrote: >> Lang: <locale> > > generally I think we should go with existing HTTP and email headers > where possible, eg. Content-Language 'k >> Description: <string> > > I kinda feel that this kind of human-readable metadata better belongs > in CMML; the skeleton tells you where to go (for each locale), the
2008 Jan 16
2
Ogg/Kate preliminary documentation
> > I did see references to Skeleton, I'll have a look at it. I didn't > > realize it was used widely > > It's not widely used currently. The idea is to make that happen. Oh, I get you now. > CMML does of course other things besides subtitles. Subtitle support > was pretty much just added recently. Kate however does not seem to > offer more than CMML in
2014 Aug 24
2
Merging Ogg streams whilst updating the Skeleton?
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > I would merge them with oggz-merge without skeleton and then add > skeleton using oggindex e.g. > http://git.xiph.org/?p=OggIndex.git;a=summary . (oggindex is also > available from http://firefogg.org/nightly/ ) Ah, that looks like the tool I was looking for! Nearly there now... With a theora+speex file, or a theora+opus file, it
2014 Aug 23
2
Merging Ogg streams whilst updating the Skeleton?
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > What does oggz-info tell you about the file when you've merged it > (without skeleton)? It may say that there are two logical video > bitstreams, because they've come from different files. So, two > skeletons may actually be correct. There should be (and are) two logical video streams - I'm trying to create a file with a
2008 Feb 08
4
Ogg/Kate preliminary documentation
> Some of the things you talk about were not solved at the CMML level, but > rather through using different Ogg > logical bitstreams. While this is possible to do it this way (and probably a good idea for the examples like a clock in a corner), it implies that all the placements and logically different "items" are known at the start of the stream (since the Ogg spec says a
2008 Nov 14
6
video chapters and subtitles in ogg containers
>> (odd, I did get this reply for Silvia, but not the original post) > > Hmm, it was properly CCed to the list. Yes, I found it in the spam bucket for some reason... > Chapters are a list of timepoints stored in the metadata. They are an > information for player software that is usually used to allow the user > to jump to certain significant points within a stream. This
2008 Feb 11
3
Ogg/Kate preliminary documentation
> Right. This was, in fact, one of the roles of "chaining" where you'd > mark such changed components with a chain boundary, at which such > things are explicitly allowed to change. The drawbacks are the > overhead of resending all the setup data for configurable codecs like > vorbis and theora, and the semantic conflict between 'chain boundary > flags an edit
2010 Apr 29
3
Ogg index and Skeleton 4.0
Hi everybody, I've updated OggIndex to now output Skeleton 4.0 tracks. The differences between Skeleton 3.x and Skeleton 4.0 with OggIndex is: * The fisbone packet now includes a "Radix" field. * The fisbone packet now includes two new compulsory message headers; "Role" and "Name". * The fishead packet no longer includes "start time"
2008 Jan 15
4
Ogg/Kate preliminary documentation
Hi, I've now uploaded the preliminary documentation on the xiph wiki: http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggKate Attached is the current source tree for the libkate library. The tarball also contains the patch to oggmerge (which you will need to apply if you want to merge Kate streams with Vorbis or Theora streams) and the patch to MPlayer to use Kate streams as subtitles. An example is
2008 Feb 15
6
Skeletal relations
We have new drafts of CMML 4.0 as a text codec and ROE as an xml stream abstract, subsuming the authoring support in CMML 3.1 and earlier. Another thing we talked about at LCA is a how to specify relationships between the various streams in Ogg so that a server, muxer or player can make intelligent decisions about the contained tracks. The general idea is to use the (http-style) Message
2008 Feb 07
3
Ogg/Kate preliminary documentation
Hi, I recognize the main name behind CMML here :) Does the redesigning of CMML allow overlapping clips ? This is the main reason of my current ramblings about seeking. While karaoke was one of the initial goals behind kate, it is just a way the format can be used with (in fact, the format itself does not refer to karaoke at all, but styles and motions). At the moment, it is a fairly versatile
2010 Feb 02
9
handling multitrack Ogg
(cc-ed to theora-dev because that will reach a larger audience - please reply to only one mailing list.) Hi all, In discussions with the video accessibility subgroup of the W3C HTML working group, we are currently looking at how to deal with multitrack video, e.g. such video that has a main video and audio track, plus e.g. a sign language video track, an audio description audio track, a caption
2010 Feb 02
9
handling multitrack Ogg
(cc-ed to theora-dev because that will reach a larger audience - please reply to only one mailing list.) Hi all, In discussions with the video accessibility subgroup of the W3C HTML working group, we are currently looking at how to deal with multitrack video, e.g. such video that has a main video and audio track, plus e.g. a sign language video track, an audio description audio track, a caption
2010 Feb 02
9
handling multitrack Ogg
(cc-ed to theora-dev because that will reach a larger audience - please reply to only one mailing list.) Hi all, In discussions with the video accessibility subgroup of the W3C HTML working group, we are currently looking at how to deal with multitrack video, e.g. such video that has a main video and audio track, plus e.g. a sign language video track, an audio description audio track, a caption
2008 Nov 13
5
video chapters and subtitles in ogg containers
I'm trying to create files that contain a video stream, one or more audio streams, subtitles, and DVD-like chapter information. ATM, I use ogm containers that can handle all this. But although ogm is supported e.g. by xine (including chapters), it seems to be an unofficial hack. Is that correct? I'd like to move to ogg containers, since ogm doesn't support theora videos. My final
2008 Feb 08
2
Ogg/Kate preliminary documentation
> not CMML, but the algorithm for remuxing from time offsets, which is > specified in the annodex Internet-Draft. This basically describes how Ah, yes, and CMML supplies a way to specify addresses which are then interpreted by this algorithm. Have I got that right ?
2008 Jan 16
2
Ogg/Kate preliminary documentation
Thanks for the feedback, > I have looked into the patch. It doesn't take into consideration > neither Skeleton, which is used now in pretty much everything encoded > in Ogg (except for single stream Vorbis and Speex files), nor the file > extension for Theora, which is now .ogv. To be honest, I just added Theora because I needed a simple way to multiplex streams. Also, it'd
2008 Nov 14
2
video chapters and subtitles in ogg containers
Hi, (odd, I did get this reply for Silvia, but not the original post) > There is CMML and kate support in vlc, and kate in mplayer though I am > not sure how it is displayed on-screen. Subtitles may display, but > chapter markers, I am not so sure about. Would you mind expanding on what chapters are, and what you'd expect to be able to do with them ? > There is an old python
2008 Jan 15
2
Ogg/Kate preliminary documentation
On 16/01/2008, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: > > * I agree that CMML is complex for something as simple as karaoke, but I disagree that karaoke is simple; to do karaoke properly is about as complex as text codecs get. I also disagree that CMML is complex, but I may be mistaken. In terms of complexity, I see it as about 10% of the way between using zero-markup and