similar to: Parameterized Samples Withdrawn

Version 1.0 of the Quick Start Guide and accompanying sample configurations is available at: http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_quickstart_guide.htm. Comments and suggestions are most welcome. Thanks, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net

Hi all (and developers in particular) I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the subject, and ends with: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year, but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed. I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the

(sort-of xposted from linux-kernel) Hi, I am wondering how to interpret this error message, which popped up on a 2.4.26 SMP x86 box two days ago: EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck init_special_inode: bogus imode (37316) EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck init_special_inode: bogus imode (37316) EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck The problem is, the error message doesn't

Hi Tom and All, I have been quietly watching the list for the last year (no new issues for me that weren''t covered in the docs or promptly "bug-fixed" by Tom. Boy, has this grown exponentially! Anyway, back to the point (the proverbial rearranging the furniture)... I have been evaluating Mandrake''s MNF as an upgrade for my Firewall box. If I do this( and even if I

Hello all, I don''t want this to be a tome'' but felt a comment was in order. Many new users (Linux and Shorewall are no different) are more apt to not read the manual(RTFM) as they view it as "Taking to long" and don''t understand it''s relevance in their particular scenario. This is unfortunate in the case of Shorewall. As the documents are not only

I have installed Mandrake 8.1 and chose ext3 for my main partitions (other than root). However, stupidly, I cannot now remember whether I specified ext3 for some other partitions that I haven't yet mounted (these are essentially just spare capacity, though they may have some files on them if they weren't formatted). Is there a simple way of telling whether I should mount these as

I got this.. The system was usuable, but not very. If I tried to access the ext3 volume, it would hang. Reboot hung too, complaining about too many open files. Any ideas? I have no idea what triggered it; this is a big file/web/mail server, with all of that on the ext3 volume. And I've never run ksymoops before, but I think I did it right. - Josh Assertion failure in

At Tom Eastep''s request, an informal Shorewall Documentation Support = Group (DSG) is hoping to relieve some of the writing and editing burdens = that come with maintaining and improving the Shorewall documentation. = The DSG welcomes and needs your suggestions and contributions about all = aspects of the documentation, including structure, content, references, = style, grammar --

http://www.alsa-project.org/~iwai/audio-latency.pdf seems to suggest that ext3 should not be used with 2.6 kernels for audio work. Why is this, and is there likely to be any improvement? - Richard. -- Richard Kimber http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/

The 1.2 firewall contains messy logic to support the old sample configurations in that any rule that contains "none" in any of its columns is ignored. I''m considering removing that messiness in 1.3 and seek the opinion of the list. Thanks, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net

Beta 3 is now available for testing. Corrections in this release: 1) Corrections included in Shorewall 4.4.21.1. 2) Several problems reported by Steven Springl. The rest is largely cleanup of the new rule infrastructure. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \

Beta 3 is now available for testing. Corrections in this release: 1) Corrections included in Shorewall 4.4.21.1. 2) Several problems reported by Steven Springl. The rest is largely cleanup of the new rule infrastructure. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \

Is there any setting in the voicemail that will send the voicemail file in a type that is recognized on a Blackberry? Kerry Garrison Director of Technical Services Tech Data Pros - Orange County's Mobile IT Service Provider (949) 502-7819 x200 - <mailto:kerryg@techdatapros.com> kerryg@techdatapros.com <http://www.techdatapros.com/> http://www.techdatapros.com --------------

I have a few IP addresses attached to an interface without problems. I also have some chrooted environments attached to these IP addresses. Is there a way to make connections (telnet) from these environments look like they are coming from the aliased IP''s rather than the main IP address? Thanks for any help Kevin.

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:00 PM, David Greene<dag at cray.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:59, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> class X { >> int A(int x) {....} >> inline int B(int x); >> }; >> inline int X::B(int x) {...} >> >> Per the language standard, A and B are semantically identical, both >> "inline".

Hi, I''m trying to get RAdmin [uses tcp 4889] access to my Windows machine which is behind my firewall. I have zones: gbl : the world loc : my lan fw : firewall I placed the following in my rules file DNAT gbl loc:192.168.0.2 tcp 4889 - When trying to RAdmin I get a cannot conect to server error. 192.168.0.2 is my Windows Machines IP address. Can anyone help me? Shorewall 1.3.9b

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello I try to setup a bridge firewall base on http://shorewall.net/bridge.html I''m using shorewall-1.4.10g-1. I doublecheck on /etc/shorewall/routestopped file on my firewall, and there is no "OPTIONS" options. Should I use different shorewall version ? Thanks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

On May 24, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > All, > > So far I've tried LLVM on amd64, i386, ia64 and powerpc under FreeBSD > and aside for ia64, things look pretty good for a first try. There > are 2 unexpected failures for PowerPC, which appear to be caused by > uninitialized memory. I'm still working on a fix for that (need to > brush up on my C++