similar to: ogg vorbis implementation on DSP

[I don't know whether this is the appropriate list, if not please let me know to whom to write. I submitted this as a CUPS bug and they replied by asking me to contact the "Samba folks"? I guess that is you] Hi, I'm using a MacBook Pro with MacOS X 10.6.4 and am trying to print on my company's printer accessible via samba. Whenever I try to access the print server via

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 14:21, Alexandre Gouraud <alexandre.gouraud at enst-bretagne.fr> wrote: > Hi Timo, > > Thanks for commenting. I feel like I have to justify why I don't want to use > QEMU, which is fine since my choice is not frozen actually. > > QEMU is much more than what I need for dynamically instrumenting software. > My goal is automated testing to find

Hello, The problem: With the command: net ads join my_linux_box my samba 3.0.1rc1 works fine with a W2k kerberos server But i prefer use the ktpass command on w2k server (and our m$ guru). The problem seems to be that samba dont use /etc/krb5.keytab. The quick read of source and some mail in the archives gives me the beleive that it use a memory keytab (and secrets.tdb ?). I m not sure. Could

Hi All, I saw a document mentioning different ext3 modes, e.g. modes=ordered, but I can't find the documentation of this feature, nor a description of the different modes. Could someone give me a pointer where I should look? TIA, Jesper -- Jesper Holmberg |"But how can | jesper.holmberg@enst-bretagne.fr | one be warm | ENST Br, BP 832, 29285 Brest, FRANCE |

Hi Timo, Thanks for commenting. I feel like I have to justify why I don't want to use QEMU, which is fine since my choice is not frozen actually. QEMU is much more than what I need for dynamically instrumenting software. My goal is automated testing to find bugs, which can quickly be intensive in term of computational load. Thus I am trying to get the smallest (and fastest) tool. Even using

Alexandre Gouraud <alexandre.gouraud at enst-bretagne.fr> writes: > like to write the same kind of thing, but not using QEMU as they claim in > the paper, but rather with my own pin tool. You could also use valgrind to convert x86 to valgrind's IR and then write a tool to convert that IR to LLVM.

* Timo Juhani Lindfors (timo.lindfors at iki.fi) wrote: > Hi, > > Alexandre Gouraud <alexandre.gouraud at enst-bretagne.fr> writes: > > if it does not already exists, could it mean it is a nonsense, then why? > > Why don't you compile your program directly to LLVM bitcode? - In security-testing you sometimes apply black boxing. I've had a similar idea

It's possible to mount cdrom in rescue mode ? because with centos 4.4 in linux rescue mode, the device "cdrom" doesn't exist -- Denis MACHARD dmachard at fr.netcentrex.net denis.machard at enst-bretagne.fr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Alexandre, On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Alexandre Gouraud <alexandre.gouraud at enst-bretagne.fr> wrote: > I am studying a paper (cf below) that says they have written a piece of code > to translate x86 instructions to LLVM. I am interested in this, and would > like to write the same kind of thing, but not using QEMU as they claim in > the paper, but rather with my own

I'm running a CentOS 4 and smartd fails to start on boot the centos 4 smartd service doesn't support scsi ? <mailto:denis.machard at enst-bretagne.fr> Denis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20061128/8f430d4c/attachment-0002.html>

--- CHI Hongliang <hongliang.chi@enst-bretagne.fr> wrote: > hello, > > I am now develloping an embeded decoding system for flac.I have a > problem about the format of the rice coding: > > the residual begins with : 01 01 08 0C > > the first two bytes are the warmups, the prediction order is 2. and > the 080C is the following: > 00 0010 0000 001100 > >

Hello Sir, I want some help from you. I have my configuration like this. I have three machines. PC1,PC2,PC3. hub hub PC1--------------------PC2-----------------------PC3 eth0 eth0,eth1 eth0 I want to work my configuration like diffserv. I am generating traffic from PC3 and sending it to PC1 via PC2(as a router)and from

i'm running on vmware system and HP proliant DL360 G5 servers on wmware, on boot i have the following message: ----------------------------- Applying Intel Microcode update: don't know to make device "cpu/microcode" [OK] ----------------------------- and on a HP proliant DL360 G5 server , on boot i have too the following message: ----------------------------- Applying

Hi, I think this should also go on the llvm-dev mailing list... On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Star Tan <tanmx_star at yeah.net> wrote: > > At 2013-07-14 02:30:07,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>On 07/13/2013 10:13 AM, Star Tan wrote: >>> Hi Tobias, >> >>Hi Star, >> >>thanks for the update. I copied the polly

I have found that the extremely expensive compile-time overhead comes from the string buffer operation for "INVALID" MACRO in the polly-detect pass. Attached is a hack patch file that simply remove the string buffer operation. This patch file can significantly reduce compile-time overhead when compiling big source code. For example, for oggen*8.ll, the compile time is reduced from

Just got ogg streaming working but I created an ogg file from a wav that appears to play ok when I do play the file from my disk with XMMS but when I stream it, it plays at double speed. I can stream test ogg files from the vobis site ok so don't know why this file can be played ok from disk but not streamed ok. The file is mono. Any ideas ??? <p>Regards Richard --- >8 ---- List

Dear all, I am studying a paper (cf below) that says they have written a piece of code to translate x86 instructions to LLVM. I am interested in this, and would like to write the same kind of thing, but not using QEMU as they claim in the paper, but rather with my own pin tool. >From what I have red until now on LLVM, and my relative poor knowledge of assembly, I have the feeling that this is

Star Tan wrote: > I have found that the extremely expensive compile-time overhead comes from the string buffer operation for "INVALID" MACRO in the polly-detect pass. > Attached is a hack patch file that simply remove the string buffer operation. This patch file can significantly reduce compile-time overhead when compiling big source code. For example, for oggen*8.ll, the compile

Tobi, it looks like this code is the problem: for (std::vector<Value *>::iterator PI = Pointers.begin(), PE = Pointers.end(); ;) { Value *V = *PI; if (V->getName().size() == 0) OS << "\"" << *V << "\""; else OS << "\"" << V->getName() <<

Commit-ID: 029622dfbfe25203275a385a5bf33d44c2409b00 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=029622dfbfe25203275a385a5bf33d44c2409b00 Author: Benjamin Cama <benjamin.cama at telecom-bretagne.eu> AuthorDate: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:17:01 +0200 Committer: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> CommitDate: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:23:14 +0200 [klibc] nfsmount: Fix