similar to: FLAC and external file attributes

Brian Willoughby wrote: > Jan Stary wrote: >>> This is 1.3.1 on OpenBSD/amd64. >>> The --no-utf8-convert option of metaflac(1) does not work for me: ... >> The problem seems to be in >> src/metaflac/operations_shorthand_vorbiscomment.c >> in the set_vc_field() function. > By the way, I've never used FLAC inside Ogg Vorbis. > Instead, I use pure

Brendan Bolles wrote: > Hey everyone, according to Wikipedia's 4-year-old information, there is no > standard for putting metadata into an Ogg file. True. > That metadata must be > included in the codec. More generally, in a stream in the Ogg file. Codecs are streams, but so are things like Ogg Skeleton. Information about Metadata has been collected together in the Xiph Wiki

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Martin Leese<martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > >> Martin Leese wrote: >>> Anyway, calling alloc()s with no corresponding >>> free()s is a memory leak. Not good code. >> >> The alloca() function allocates space on the stack and >> that

OK Martin. Thank you for the explanations and for your time. I am writing a program that reads and writes all existent Tags types. It lacks only to end the edition (rewriting) of "Native" Flac and Matroska. Both cases for the same problem: the separation of Tags and Picture in different blocks. In Flac I resolved it, but now I have to add METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE. Reading Vorbis

You said "With the exception of where to put a picture file, VorbisComments in a Vorbis stream are the same as VorbisComments in a FLAC stream." In METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE case they would not be the same. Up to now we could exchange the complete block of VorbisComments. But with the addiction of METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE doesn't happen this way. In Ogg files the METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE

On 23 Jul 2013 15:17, "Martin Leese" <martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> wrote: > > Brendan Bolles wrote: > > > Hey everyone, according to Wikipedia's 4-year-old information, there is no > > standard for putting metadata into an Ogg file. > > True. > > > That metadata must be > > included in the codec. > > More generally, in a

I have been tidying up the VorbisComment page in the XiphWiki. The problem with it was that it was a mixture of proposals and discussion of those proposals. This made it difficult for implementers to see what to implement. The problem section is: http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/VorbisComment#New_ENCODER_field_name_proposal This is a mess, and all I could do was add attributions to the

Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Martin Leese wrote: >> Anyway, calling alloc()s with no corresponding >> free()s is a memory leak. Not good code. > > The alloca() function allocates space on the stack and > that allocation is automatically freed when the function > that did the allocation returns. > > The Linux man page is quite

"Kurosawa, Taku" wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > Sorry for the late reply again, > The application we are preparing this time is not exactly similar to > Replaygain. > > Replaygain as we understand is something which normalize the loudness at > content provider side, but our application takes different approach. It is > designed to normalize the loudness at player

"Gabriel I." wrote: > Greetings, > > I apologize if I posted this in the wrong list, I wasn't sure where to post > it, but seeing as the tags are called "vorbis comments" I thought vorbis, > rather than ogg-dev, would be the right choice. (actually, I'm not even a > developer anyway) Hi Gabriel, I doubt whether the Xiph community would promote a

Martin Leese wrote: ... > Finally, Jan might have more luck taking his > problem with metatflac over to the flac-dev list. Even better, he could submit a bug report at: http://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/ Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/

On Dec 05 20:16:47, hans at stare.cz wrote: > This is 1.3.1 on OpenBSD/amd64. > The --no-utf8-convert option of metaflac(1) does not work for me: > > $ metaflac --no-utf8-convert --set-tag="Artist=?ou?l??ek" aladin.flac > aladin.flac: ERROR: tag value for 'Artist' is not valid UTF-8 > (You probably can't see the Czech letters properly in my mail, > but

Oleksij Rempel <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote: > Ok, > you are right, using existing technology will save time :) What has not yet been discussed is what you are streaming *to*. That is to say, what software is going to receive the metadata, and what will it do with it. This is important because VorbisComments can contain pretty much anything you want. Suggestions for field

Oleksij Rempel <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> > On 05.06.2012 20:41, Martin Leese wrote: ... >> On 6/5/12, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> || We need fallowing tags: >> || creation datetime: seconds and time zone should be included. >> || source host: it can be name or guid. to organise created files by >> sources. >> || keywords,events. >> || date

Dennis Brunnenmeyer <dennisb at chronometrics.com> wrote: > Somewhere I thought I saw a list of proposed extensions to the small set > of pre-defined vorbis comments. If adopted, would these become part of > the FLAC standard, or would they stand alone as recommended practice. This is something I did. The spreadsheet is called "FieldNames.xls" and can be found here:

On 10/25/18, Rodger Combs wrote: > >> On Oct 25, 2018, at 12:47, Martin Leese <martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> >> wrote: ... >> An alternative approach is to only define >> popular layouts. For more obscure layouts, >> such as 2.1 and Mid/Side, assume that the >> person doing the encoding knew what they >> put in, and so knows what will come

On 7/23/13, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 Jul 2013 15:17, "Martin Leese" <martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> > wrote: ... >> Information about Metadata >> has been collected together in the Xiph Wiki >> at: >> https://wiki.xiph.org/Metadata > > That page is a bit outdated. It has CMML in it which we

" Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves " <justivo at gmail.com> wrote: ... > To be fair, only the Vorbis users requested albumart. FLAC users > should in theory be able to use the tag too if they want, but this > wouldn't be something we'd see in other codecs like Speex and Theora. This is a minor point, but FLAC users can already do this using METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE (which

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Martin Leese <martin.leese at stanfordalumni.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:42:04 -0700 Subject: To: flac-dev at xiph.org Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Can someone please remove this moron > spammer [Gourav Tewatia] from this list. And also delete their four posts from the archive (otherwise the SPAM links will be picked up by search

Bastiaan Timmer wrote: ... > In a > previous message I mentioned writing some more convenience functions, but on > closer inspection they would either be inefficient or very difficult > to implement. Could you briefly list these, in case somebody else wants to have a go. Many thanks, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: