similar to: flac-dev Digest, Vol 149, Issue 5

I've been looking over Benjamin Schwartz's Skeleton A-mod proposal. I've been pretty busy with other projects over the past few months, so haven't had a chance to look at Ogg indexing until now... In general, I think Benjamin's ideas are sound, they're improvements, and I'm open to being convinced to take them in the next index version. We may as well get the index

Hello all! (cc-ing the flac-dev list) I would like to give an update as to the recent CELLAR work on the FLAC specification. • Work has been done to make internal and external links more accurate and reliable. • 'Rice Coding' has been clarified as 'Exponential Golomb Coding.' • Clarifications have been made for binary representation. • Typos and other small changes have been

Op 01-10-15 om 18:14 schreef lvqcl: > Currently libFLAC stores residual signal as 32-bit signed int. And there > are the following comments in stream_encoder.c: The residual is stored as a Golomb/Rice code. As far as I know, that is not limited to 32-bit in the format itself, only in the implementation. However, there are two residual coding methods now: rice and rice2. rice2 was added

I wrote the following bit of code static APInt FloorOfQuotient(APInt a, APInt b) { unsigned bits = a.getBitWidth(); APInt q(bits, 1), r(bits, 1); APInt::sdivrem(a, b, q, r); * errs() << "sdivrem(" << a << ", " << b << ") = (" << q << ", " << r << ")\n"; * if (r == 0) return q; else {

OK, the code for sdivrem in APInt.h is wrong. Here's what's written: static void sdivrem(const APInt &LHS, const APInt &RHS, APInt &Quotient, APInt &Remainder) { if (LHS.isNegative()) { if (RHS.isNegative()) APInt::udivrem(-LHS, -RHS, Quotient, Remainder); else APInt::udivrem(-LHS, RHS, Quotient, Remainder); Quotient =

hi netters Is there a function in R that can compute the quotient and remainder of a division calculation? such that when 11 is given as the dividend and 5 the divider, the function returns 2(quotient) and 1(remainder). Thanks a lot! _________________________________________________________________ 伱佲伔佈佅伮佋佖 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/

Hi, I conduct a panel data estimation and obtain estimators for two of the coefficients beta1 and beta2. R tells me the mean and covariance of the distribution of (beta1, beta2). Now I would like to find the distribution of the quotient beta1/beta2, and one way to do it is to simulate via the joint distribution (beta1, beta2), where both beta1 and beta2 follow t distribution. How could we

Introduction: We would like to add new keyword to 'sdiv'\'udiv' instructions i.e. 'no-overflow'. This is the updated solution devised in the discussion: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118257.html The proposed keywords: "nof" stands for 'no-overflow' Syntax: <result> = sdiv nof <ty> <op1>,

I'm translating a matlab routine to R and I need some equivalent to deconv(): Description: deconv() [q,r] = deconv(v,u) deconvolves vector u out of vector v, using long division. The quotient is returned in vector q and the remainder in vector r such that v = conv(u,q)+r . If u and v are vectors of polynomial coefficients, convolving them is equivalent to multiplying the two polynomials, and

how do I code the following in R. I want to produce a vector where dx=log( (d(x))/(d(x-1)) ). I can do it for dx=diff(log(x)). I am learning/trying to model log returns of a stock market index. But instead of using the difference of the closing values of two consecutive days, i want to use the log of the quotient of the two days. any help is most appreciated. d is a vector of the closing values of

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:58:29PM +0000, Renato Golin wrote: > I can see the error, and it's just a bad selection of choices. I was > wrong in assuming that the "eabi" at the end would always force it: > > $ clang -target arm-elf-eabi -S mod.c -o - | grep mod > .file "mod.c" > bl __modsi3 > bl __umodsi3 I was discussing this with Tim on IRC and he

I scanned the website with linkchecker and found quite a lot of dead links. This commit fixes or removes them. --- developers.html | 2 +- documentation_tasks.html | 2 +- download.html | 12 ++++++------ faq.html | 2 +- features.html | 2 +- feeds/feed.xml | 8 ++++++++ format.html | 8 ++++----

I scanned the website with linkchecker and found quite a lot of dead links. This commit fixes or removes them. --- developers.html | 2 +- documentation_tasks.html | 2 +- download.html | 14 +++++++------- faq.html | 2 +- features.html | 2 +- feeds/feed.xml | 8 ++++++++ format.html | 8 ++++----

On my test machine, in set_time_scale(), the following code: ts->mul_frac = div_frac(MILLISECS(1000), tps32); crashes with a division by zero error if tps32 == 1000000000d. Unfortunately, tps32 is often that value. Does anyone know why this happens? I''ve resolved it temporarily by checking for tps32 == 1000000000 and changing the value slightly (101000010d works fine on my test

On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > +static inline int64_t > > > +human_size_parse (const char *str, > > > + const char **error, const char **pstr) > > > +{ > > > + int64_t size; > > > + char *end; > > > + uint64_t scale = 1; > > > + > > > + /* XXX Should we

Hi all, I'm jumping in on this thread to make a few remarks about the spec. I implemented a FLAC decoder by only looking at the spec, and I have a few notes that would have saved me a lot of time if the spec had mentioned them. They are obvious in hindsight, of course. * If the channel assignment includes a difference channel, then the subframe for that channel has one extra bit per sample

Hi all, > On Jun 5, 2017, at 11:52 PM, Andrew James Weaver <weevz at uw.edu> wrote: > > Hello all! > (cc-ing the flac-dev list) > > I would like to give an update as to the recent CELLAR work on the FLAC specification. > > • Work has been done to make internal and external links more accurate and reliable. > • 'Rice Coding' has been clarified as

On Mon 3 Sep 4:04 pm Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves wrote: > > can the flac encoder be used to compress non-wave data? > No, it's not possible. ?That's actually very silly. Actually, there is no reason it should not run on the data fine, if presented to it appropriately. Input data is a binary stream, and any input will work correctly. With music data, most algorithms rely on the fact

Hello, In my last post, I seemed to say that there were no directional wavelet transforms that would give improvement to the NHW codec, but are directional wavelets an active research field today? I have also seen some recent patents on advanced and improved SPIHT, and I am a little surprised that there is no "up-to-date" state-of-the-art wavelet codec.Rududu in April 2008 was the last

Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 00:59:22 +0200 > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 07:21:08PM +0000, Dan Stowell wrote: > > I asked a few questions about the flac format a couple of weeks ago. > > One more (if you don't mind) about the Rice coding. The Rice > > parameter "k" can't be zero (unless I'm mistaken), yet the FLAC spec > > says the Rice parameter can range