similar to: 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

For what it's worth, I tested both the 32- and 64-bit flac.exe's on my Windows 10, with about 45 WAV files I have. Got some warnings about unexpected metadata, but the audio was encoded fine. Using the --keep-foreign-metadata flag cleared those warnings. I even had a weird WAV that caused "WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample=24", but flac dealt

Hi all, New pre-release here is at: http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz Changes: * Fix tests with Makefile.lite build system. * Fixes for non-Intel CPUs. MD5 and SHA256 sums: > md5sum flac-1.3.2pre3* 61aa8597a220303daf4beb2b8756979d flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz 8b470ceac02340600db73bc6daea4fc7 flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip

I received a message from C.R.Helmrich (he doesn't want to subscribe just to post a single message). The following message was posted by C.R.Helmrich [begin] Hi, I tested my own Win32 compile of pre1 and pre2 one or two weeks ago (flac.exe through foobar2000 for transcoding), and the results were as expected: no errors, roughly same speed on my Intel Core i...something mobile, very

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:19:21AM +0000, oresteszoupanos at hotmail.com wrote: > > For what it's worth, I tested both the 32- and 64-bit flac.exe's on my > Windows 10, with about 45 WAV files I have. > > Got some warnings about unexpected metadata, but the audio was encoded > fine. Using the --keep-foreign-metadata flag cleared those warnings. Excellent! Do you

Hi, attached are patches that improve decoding speed a bit. The first patch improves the bit scan macro used for decoding unary values, the second one adds a GCC inline assembly for bswap and the third patch replaces the read_rice_block function. In my testing it turned out to be even faster than the _ia32_bswap function. If the code produced by MSVC is faster as well, I'd suggest to remove

Dear list, i'm doing a bit of analisys on flac's source code and i've run into something i can't quite grasp. flac version 1.2.1 flaclib C stream_encoder.c function "process_subframes_" line 2999 ++++++++++++++++++++++ if(do_mid_side) { FLAC__ASSERT(encoder->protected_->channels == 2); for(channel = 0; channel < 2; channel++) {

1) Added assert FLAC__ASSERT((bits == 32) || (val>>bits == 0)) It was inspired by https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/351/ Such situation should be detected at least. 2) Unnecessary assignments removed: bw->accum = val; bw->bits = 0; (bw->bits is already 0 at this place). 3) Asserts like FLAC__ASSERT(parameter < sizeof(unsigned)*8) were changed to

Here's a patch to allow flac and metaflac handle files with malformed vorbiscomment metadata block. -------------- next part -------------- diff --git a/src/libFLAC/metadata_iterators.c b/src/libFLAC/metadata_iterators.c index d50df39..39cb276 100644 --- a/src/libFLAC/metadata_iterators.c +++ b/src/libFLAC/metadata_iterators.c @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static FLAC__Metadata_SimpleIteratorStatus

--- configure.ac | 7 +++++ src/libFLAC/bitreader.c | 12 ++------- src/libFLAC/bitwriter.c | 8 ++---- src/libFLAC/fixed.c | 18 +++++-------- src/libFLAC/format.c | 8 ++---- src/libFLAC/include/private/macros.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++ src/libFLAC/metadata_iterators.c | 17 +++---------

Hi all! I have a problem to get _all_ images from flac file. I have flac file with 3 images inside ( FLAC__METADATA_TYPE_PICTURE ) How to get _all_ images with bool FLAC::Metadata::get_picture() func? This function is wrapper FLAC__bool FLAC__metadata_get_picture(). flac-1.2.1/src/libFLAC/metadata_iterators.c: ... 285 FLAC_API FLAC__bool FLAC__metadata_get_picture(const char *filename,

The following series adds initial vector support for PowerPC64. On POWER9, flac --best is about 3.3x faster. Amitay Isaacs (2): Add m4 macro to check for C __attribute__ features Check if compiler supports target attribute on ppc64 Anton Blanchard (5): configure.ac: Remove SPE detection code configure.ac: Add VSX enable/disable configure.ac: Fix FLAC__CPU_PPC on little endian, and add

I always use --prefix, and it gets put in the right place (<prefix>/include/FLAC/assert.h), which I'm sure sheds no new light on this. I'd still like to know why FLAC__ASSERT() is necessary. K&R is very clear that the preprocessor is to remove calls to assert() if NDEBUG is defined. (Some compilers, including gcc, implicitly define NDEBUG when optimizing, but of course it can

Hi all, I've made a test release for Ogg DirectShow Codecs. You can find it here: http://www.xiph.org/dshow/uploads/Main/oggcodecs_0.80.15035.exe The problem is that I get a HEAP Corruption detected at: void FLAC__bitreader_free(FLAC__BitReader *br) { FLAC__ASSERT(0 != br); if(0 != br->buffer) free(br->buffer); The call stack is: >

Hi all, I've made a test release for Ogg DirectShow Codecs. You can find it here: http://www.xiph.org/dshow/uploads/Main/oggcodecs_0.80.15035.exe The problem is that I get a HEAP Corruption detected at: void FLAC__bitreader_free(FLAC__BitReader *br) { FLAC__ASSERT(0 != br); if(0 != br->buffer) free(br->buffer); The call stack is: >

Hi all, I added -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes to the CFLAGS and found that there were a number warnings generated. The patch below fixes those warnings and adds the two -W flags to configure.in. Cheers, Erik ----------------------8<----------------------8<---------------------- --- src/metaflac/operations_shorthand.h 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 +++

Hi all, I was investigating the behaviour of the -p switch of flac. This switch should enable exhaustive search for the optimal qlp coefficient precision, but the resulting files are usually 0.5% larger then when not using the switch. I stumbled upon this code in stream_encoder > if(encoder->protected_->do_qlp_coeff_prec_search) { > min_qlp_coeff_precision =

In 2007, user reported a segfault in FLAC::Encoder::File::progress_callback() when called from ~Stream(). Original report at https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/256/ Hello! Sorry, english is not my best language. I use libFLAC++ API. I have some problems. In libFLAC API all OK. Unhandled exception at 0x00000000 in Test.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x00000000. Call stack

More or less detailed explanation of this patch. 1. The first parameter of _BitScanReverse() and _BitScanReverse64() is a pointer to unsigned long (4-byte int). However _BitScanReverse64() is called with a pointer to FLAC__uint64 (8-byte int). IMHO it's a bug and this patch changes the type of idx variable inside FLAC__bitmath_ilog2_wide() from FLAC__uint64 to unsigned long. The type of idx

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 06:48:06PM +0200, Josh Green wrote: > It seems that generally Wavpack does a little better than FLAC at > compressing audio. But that is generally within a rather small margin. > 20% margin seems a little large to me though. There may indeed be no > problem with the FLAC reference implementation in regards to 24 bit and > its just having trouble compressing

Josh, I added the following trivial implementation of the C++ file decoder FLAC::Decoder::File::get_decode_position() to my file_decoder.cpp file... bool File::get_decode_position(FLAC__uint64 *position) const { FLAC__ASSERT(is_valid()); return (bool)::FLAC__file_decoder_get_decode_position(decoder_, position); } I would humbly suggest it be included in future libFLAC++ releases.