similar to: [PATCH] workaround for a bug in MSVC 2015 U2

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> As I wrote earlier, MSVC 2015 U2 incorrectly compiles >> stream_encoder_intrin_*.c files for x86-64 platform. >> As a result, flac works, but compression ratio is close to 1. >> This patch disables some compiler optimizations, and >> compression ratio reverts back to normal values. > > Rather than having the same chunk of code in

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Ok, I'll take the original patch as it is. DO you have a link to a > bug report on this problem? It would be nice to put it in a comment > above the workaround. :sigh: I hoped that somebody else will find what's wrong and will create a bugreport... Well, here is the link:

So, I noticed that a lot of the fixes discussed here recently, including the ZFS/NFS interaction bug fixes and the deadlock fix has made it into 20060327 that was released this morning. My question is whether we''ll see all these up to the minute bug fixes in the Solaris 10 update that brings ZFS to that product, or if there is a specific date where no further updates will make it in to

In stream_encoder.c there's the following code: #if defined FLAC__CPU_X86_64 /* and other 64-bit arch, too */ if(mean <= 0x80000000/512) { /* 512: more or less optimal for both 16- and 24-bit input */ #else if(mean <= 0x80000000/8) { /* 32-bit arch: use 32-bit math if possible */ #endif A) How to properly check for 64-bit architectures? I can check for "defined

1) src/share/grabbag/snprintf.c, line 42: 'on systems with a norrmal ISO C99' 'norrmal' -> 'normal' 2) src/flac/encode.c, line 1661: '(eg, very short files, < 10000 fames)' 'fames' -> frames? samples? bytes? 3) configure.ac, line 140: 'AM_CONDITIONAL(FLAC__CPU_X86_64, test "x$cpu_x86_64" = xtrue)' Not sure about this, but

> Oliver St?neberg wrote: > > > This is simply fixed by putting those unused constants into the > > proper defines. I attached a patch against git 70b078c. > > Unfortunately it breaks x86_64 build (where FLAC__CPU_X86_64 is defined, and > FLAC__CPU_IA32 isn't). Maybe it's simpler to turn them into #defines such as > > #define

Author: dm89450 Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: fe0bf8e57ac4df0265e4c3d932b3183d06de3f88 Log message: 6217588 New Keyboards software needed for S11 and S10 U2 Files: create: usr/src/cmd/loadkeys/type_6/albania create: usr/src/cmd/loadkeys/type_6/belarus create: usr/src/cmd/loadkeys/type_6/bulgaria create: usr/src/cmd/loadkeys/type_6/croatia create:

Hi, I am trying to run wIntergate by IBM (Now U2) which is a gloried telnet terminal for connecting to mv database server. The installation worked fine. The problem is with execution of wInteg.exe. It starts fine but after some time throws error "An Unexpected license error 0x40000000 has occur" after which it hangs. On investigating in Windows environment. I see that it's also

In order to get llvm to compile on Windows with MSVC 10, I have to disable inline on utostr to avoid internal compiler failure, and disable _xgetbv call in OsSupportsAVX because it's only defined in MSVC 2012 compiler. The first patch (noinline) is known for many months now. I'm a casual llvm user, and don't know the proper channels to go through to submit a patch. Could someone tell

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Sergiy Migdalskiy <migdalskiy at hotmail.com> wrote: > In order to get llvm to compile on Windows with MSVC 10, I have to disable > inline on utostr to avoid internal compiler failure, and disable _xgetbv > call in OsSupportsAVX because it's only defined in MSVC 2012 compiler. The > first patch (noinline) is known for many months now. I'm

It's not possible to use ia32/*.nasm code in 64-bit compiles. There's still no 64-bit asm code in FLAC. I'm not familiar with asm too, so I wrote SSE-accelerated code using intrinsics. This code uses two new preprocessor macros: FLAC__CPU_X86_64 (analogous to FLAC__CPU_IA32) and FLAC__HAS_X86INTRIN (analogous to FLAC__HAS_NASM) Patch for cpu.c/cpu.h adds CPU features (sse3, ssse3)

Hi, after having some discussion of the FPU/SSE behavior on the sf.net bug tracker as well as having some other changes we made for the MAME/MESS project sitting around I thought about joining this list to make things easier. First one is the latest modification we had to make to compile with clang 3.4 x64. Here are the warnings the 1.2.1 source will give with it:

Hi, If I have an R object UUU, where the second element is U2, based on "g" column of my.table my.table of UUU is: mmm ggg gindex map Info aaa123 U1 1 1 1 aaa124 U1 1 2 1 bbb1378 U2 2 1 1 bbb8888 U2 2 2 0 bbb1389 U2 2 3

Dear R helpers,   I know this is a simple task, but I'm new to R and I'm still havind difficulties with the language. I want to create 30 vectors to be used in a simulation, each with 1 columm and 5 lines, of random numbers N(0,1). What I tried was this:   N=150 u2<-rep(1:150,0) u2<-list(matrix(0,5)) u2 for(i in 1:N) { u2[i]<-rnorm(5) } u2 ### also tried this: N=150

Hello, I have two nodes running the 2.6.9-22.0.2.ELsmp kernel and the OCFS2 1.2.1 RPMs. About once a week, one of the nodes crashes itself (self- fencing) and I get a full vmcore on my netdump server. The netdump log file shows the shared filesystem LUN (/dev/dm-6) did not respond within 12000ms. I have not changed the default heartbeat values in /etc/sysconfig/o2cb. There was no other IO

>From the DeveloperPolicy.html document I gathered I need to send a patch to this list (which I did); could you clarify if I misunderstood it? The second patch is really trivial and I think it's worth applying - it seems like a typo by someone who tested on MSVC 11 but not 10; or maybe my local instance of MSVC10 is somehow deficient, of course. The first patch is adding MSVC-specific

Dear all, Suppose I have a very long expression e. Lets assume, for simplicity, that it is e = expression(u1+u2+u3) Now I wish to replace u2 with x and u3 with 1. I.e. the 'new' expression, after replacement, should be: > e expression(u1+x+1) My question is how to do the replacement? I have tried using: > e = parse(text=gsub("u2","x",e)) > e =

Dear all, I am using the function 'D' in the 'stats' package to perform symbolic derivation. This works very well and it is much faster than e.g. Mathematica (at least for my purposes). First, I would like to thank the development team for this excellent function. However, I run into trouble in some cases, particularly when I am to do some operations on long expressions

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> 3) configure.ac, line 140: 'AM_CONDITIONAL(FLAC__CPU_X86_64, test "x$cpu_x86_64" = xtrue)' >> >> Not sure about this, but other names inside AM_CONDITIONALs begin with FLaC__, >> not FLAC__. A quote from configure.ac: "NOTE that for many of the AM_CONDITIONALs >> we use the prefix FLaC__ instead of FLAC__ since

If this is posted elsewhere I cannot find it. I need to perform multiple integration where some of the variables are in the bounds of the other variables. I was trying to use R2Cuba function but cannot set the upper and lower bounds. My code so far is : int <- function(y){ u2 = y[1] z2 = y[2] u1 =y[3] z1 = y[4] ff <- u1*(z1-u1)*u2*(z2-u2)*exp(-0.027*(12-z2)) return(ff) }