Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Are pointers to FLAC__int32 and int interchangeable?"
2015 Oct 08
1
Are pointers to FLAC__int32 and int interchangeable?
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Well FLAC__int32 is just a 32 bit integer and on all the platforms/
> architecures/compilers that FLAC supports FLAC__int32 and int are
> the same.
>
> Personally I think the FLAC__xxxx stuff should go, to be replaced with
> C standard int32_t, uint32_t, int16_t etc, at least for internal code.
> I am slowly doing that when I touch code.
>
>
2012 May 04
0
[PATCH] Optimize FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed
---
src/libFLAC/bitreader.c | 445 +++++++++++------------------------------------
1 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 340 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libFLAC/bitreader.c b/src/libFLAC/bitreader.c
index ae515a0..7ae086d 100644
--- a/src/libFLAC/bitreader.c
+++ b/src/libFLAC/bitreader.c
@@ -755,379 +755,144 @@ FLAC__bool FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed(FLAC__BitReader *br, int *val, unsig
}
2015 Oct 07
0
Are pointers to FLAC__int32 and int interchangeable?
lvqcl wrote:
> Is it Ok to pass FLAC__int32* in a function that expects int* ?
Well FLAC__int32 is just a 32 bit integer and on all the platforms/
architecures/compilers that FLAC supports FLAC__int32 and int are
the same.
As for pointers, all pointers are the same until you try an increment
them. If you have some type, lets call it sometype_t, and a pointer to
types of sometype_t :
2017 Jan 13
2
unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably
unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably, leading to
warnings with platforms (e.g. djgpp) where int32_t is long:
bitreader.c: In function `FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed':
bitreader.c:721: warning: passing arg 2 of
`FLAC__bitreader_read_unary_unsigned' from incompatible pointer type
bitreader.c: In function `FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed_block':
bitreader.c:850:
2008 Mar 14
2
bitreader optimizations
Hi,
attached are patches that improve decoding speed a bit. The first
patch improves the bit scan macro used for decoding unary values, the
second one adds a GCC inline assembly for bswap and the third patch
replaces the read_rice_block function.
In my testing it turned out to be even faster than the _ia32_bswap
function. If the code produced by MSVC is faster as well, I'd suggest
to remove
2012 May 09
1
[PATCH 2/2] bitmath: Finish up optimizations
This patch adds support for other compilers and systems
including MSVC, Intel C compiler etc..
---
src/libFLAC/bitmath.c | 48 -------------
src/libFLAC/bitreader.c | 54 ++-------------
src/libFLAC/include/private/bitmath.h | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libFLAC/bitmath.c
2008 Mar 17
0
bitreader optimizations
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 07:36:31PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> attached are patches that improve decoding speed a bit. The first
> patch improves the bit scan macro used for decoding unary values, the
> second one adds a GCC inline assembly for bswap and the third patch
> replaces the read_rice_block function.
The third patch has a bug causing reading past input buffer, attaching
2012 Aug 28
3
[PATCH 1/3] Make FLAC__clz_soft_uint32 static.
---
src/libFLAC/include/private/bitmath.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libFLAC/include/private/bitmath.h b/src/libFLAC/include/private/bitmath.h
index 61b0e03..d32b1a7 100644
--- a/src/libFLAC/include/private/bitmath.h
+++ b/src/libFLAC/include/private/bitmath.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
#endif
/* Will never be emitted for MSVC, GCC, Intel compilers */
2008 Jun 14
1
[Flac] Ogg Codecs 0.80.15035
Hi all,
I've made a test release for Ogg DirectShow Codecs.
You can find it here:
http://www.xiph.org/dshow/uploads/Main/oggcodecs_0.80.15035.exe
The problem is that I get a HEAP Corruption detected at:
void FLAC__bitreader_free(FLAC__BitReader *br)
{
FLAC__ASSERT(0 != br);
if(0 != br->buffer)
free(br->buffer);
The call stack is:
>
2008 Jun 14
1
Ogg Codecs 0.80.15035
Hi all,
I've made a test release for Ogg DirectShow Codecs.
You can find it here:
http://www.xiph.org/dshow/uploads/Main/oggcodecs_0.80.15035.exe
The problem is that I get a HEAP Corruption detected at:
void FLAC__bitreader_free(FLAC__BitReader *br)
{
FLAC__ASSERT(0 != br);
if(0 != br->buffer)
free(br->buffer);
The call stack is:
>
2014 Jul 27
1
[PATCH] remove obsolete cpu_info from struct FLAC__BitReader
In FLAC 1.2.0, a new field 'FLAC__CPUInfo cpu_info' was added to the
struct FLAC__BitReader. It became useless in 1.3.0 because of
various bitreader optimizations. The first patch removes it
and also removes FLAC__CPUInfo argument of FLAC__bitreader_init() function.
The second patch removes a comment about struct FLAC__BitReader.
It seems that it should really belong to
2012 Apr 07
1
[PATCH 2/2] Update and improve autotools build
- INCLUDES is deprecated, and CPPFLAGS is an user-defined
variable, use the proper AM_CPPFLAGS instead
- Remove FLAC__INLINE definition, providing proper
replacement for MSVC compilers.
- Detect if we have C99 's lround and provide a replacement
for windows...
---
configure.ac | 32 ++++++++--------------------
examples/c/decode/file/Makefile.am
2008 Jun 14
0
[Flac] Ogg Codecs 0.80.15035
Cristian Adam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've made a test release for Ogg DirectShow Codecs.
> You can find it here:
> http://www.xiph.org/dshow/uploads/Main/oggcodecs_0.80.15035.exe
>
> The problem is that I get a HEAP Corruption detected at:
>
> void FLAC__bitreader_free(FLAC__BitReader *br)
> {
> FLAC__ASSERT(0 != br);
>
> if(0 != br->buffer)
2017 Jan 19
4
[PATCH] Fix cppcheck warnings
---
src/libFLAC/bitreader.c | 4 ++--
src/libFLAC/bitwriter.c | 4 ++--
src/plugin_xmms/plugin.c | 2 +-
src/share/utf8/charset.c | 1 +
src/test_libFLAC++/encoders.cpp | 8 ++++----
src/test_libFLAC/decoders.c | 4 ++--
src/test_libFLAC/encoders.c | 8 ++++----
7 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libFLAC/bitreader.c
2013 Mar 11
2
flac 1.3.0pre2 pre-release
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:30:18AM -0400, Ben Allison wrote:
> Take, for example, the function FLAC__bitreader_is_consumed_byte_aligned.
> It is prototyped in bitreader.h It is used in stream_decoder.c, so it
> must be defined and made available to the linker ("external definition").
> However, the only definition in bitreader.c has been declared inline.
>
> From
2013 Mar 11
0
flac 1.3.0pre2 pre-release
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:30:18AM -0400, Ben Allison wrote:
>> From 6.7.4.6
>> An inline definition does not provide an external definition for the
>> function, and does not forbid an external definition in another
>> translation unit. An inline definition provides an alternative to an
>> external definition, which a translator may use to implement any call to
2004 Dec 28
2
libFLAC bitbuffer optimizations
Pulled from my Arch archive, this following patch seems to have made
quite a difference in getting my ARM7TDMI chip to play FLAC (compression
levels 0-2) on my ipod. I don't have benchmarks with hard numbers, but
playing with skips vs playing without skips is a fairly noticeable
difference.
memcpy and memset on uClibc are optimized in asm for the ARM7TDMI in
uClibc. Other hardware/libc
2013 Mar 03
3
Fwd: flac 1.3.0pre1 prelease
Ben Allison wrote:
> There's a more few issues for compiling on MSVC. I put together a patch.
>
> Here's a quick rundown:
> * must use __inline keyword with static inline functions (bitmath.h)
If you include "share/compath.h" you will get a inline #defined as __inline
when _MSC_VER is defined. I'd prefer a single diffinition of that in one
place and one place
2013 Mar 03
5
Fwd: flac 1.3.0pre1 prelease
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> Maybe a stupid question, but I was born stupid and I have walked that
> path ever since, so: Is there a changelog?
The only changelog is the git changelog. I will be writing a real
changelog to go in the actual release tarball before the official
release.
The git changelog is available here:
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=summary
or in any git clone of
2008 May 30
1
Is DateTime and Time interchangeable?
I have datetime (SQL) column in my DB, and I noticed whenever I
retrieve that column using ActiveRecord, it returns an object of class
Time instead of DateTime. Does Rails convert treat datetime and time
as if they''re the same?
Eric
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: