Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "1.4 Samples"
2004 Apr 16
0
Shorewall 2.0 French Language Guides available
Thanks to Fabien Demassieux, French Language versions of the QuickStart
Guides and the Setup Guide are now available:
http://shorewall.net/shorewall_quickstart_guide.htm
http://shorewall.sf.net/shorewall_quickstart_guide.htm
These guides will be available shortly on the other Shorwall Mirrors
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \
2003 Jan 28
0
French versions of the Basic Quickstart Guides
Thanks to Patrice Vetsel, there are now French versions available. They are
linked from http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_quickstart_guide.htm.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2004 Aug 01
0
Re: shorewall.conf note
Jens wrote:
> It seems that the standard setup as per my debian system has
> the following : IP_FORWARDING=keep
> To make my system work I had to change this to IP_FORWARDING=on.
>
> I have a pretty basic/stock debian (unstable) box sitting here for shorewall.
> As far as I remember, nothing on this box as relating to ip_forwarding was
> changed.
>
> I
2003 Aug 26
2
French Translation of the Shorewall Setup Guide
Thanks to Fabien Luciole, there is now a French version of the Shorewall
Setup Guide (http://shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide_fr.htm).
Thanks Fabien!!!
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2004 Sep 23
0
Fwd: RE: 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall
FYI...
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall
Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44
From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca>
To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net>
I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I
noticed I completely forgot
2003 Feb 09
4
Re[2]: Help with Shorewall configuration using a static IP
Hello Tom,
Monday, February 10, 2003, 2:35:45 AM, you wrote:
TE> In the future, PLEASE POST PROBLEM REPORTS TO THE MAILING
TE> LIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TE> --On Monday, February 10, 2003 1:51 AM +0530 Srinivasa R Kotu
TE> <kotu@ocimumbio.com> wrote:
>> masq file
>>
>># interface subnet address
>> eth1:0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0
2004 Sep 29
0
Re: Shorewall-users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 65
Hi
I have 2nic firewall . I had to open some ranges of udp and tcp ports . I
faced a problem that although all the ports are open Some functionality was
not working . Any body used shorewall with H323 Voip traffic DNATed . Any
help is appretiated .
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: <shorewall-users-request@lists.shorewall.net>
To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net>
Sent:
2004 Nov 02
3
Shorewall 2.2.0 Beta 2
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2
ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2
Problems Corrected:
1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error
message:
/usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753:
check_dupliate_zones: command not found
2. The
2002 Jun 02
0
Quickstart & Samples
Ok -- I''ve calmed down to a slow boil now after discovering that once
again, one or more of the sample configurations are broken and 100''s of
newbies have downloaded them.
Rather than removing all links to the Quickstart Guide, I''ve placed the
following disclaimer on the top of the guide:
NOTICE: This QuickStart Guide is currently unmaintained and I make no
claims
2005 Sep 20
0
Fwd: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet
FYI
This bug will prevent ''shorewall restore'' from working if you have "!<single
IP address>" in the ORIGINAL DEST column.
-Tom
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet
Date: Wednesday 14 September 2005 15:09
From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
The conntrack
2004 Nov 02
0
Shorewall 2.2.0 Beta 2
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2
ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2
Problems Corrected:
1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error
message:
/usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753:
check_dupliate_zones: command not found
2. The
2003 Aug 25
0
cant open port (fwd)
And Andrew -- PLEASE don''t reply off-list. I''m not a private help desk...
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:01:34 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
To: andrew
2005 Jan 21
0
End of Support Life for Shorewall 1.4 will be February 1
Just a warning that support for Shorewall 1.4 will cease with the
release of Shorewall 2.2.0 which is now scheduled for February 1.
See
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-announce/2004-December/000451.html
for information about migrating from Shorewall 1.4 to Shorewall 2.2.0.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \
2007 Nov 28
2
[Fwd: Re: Port 3001 still have problem]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
As I pointed out to Wilson in a private message, this appears to show
that no other connection requests (other than port 3000) are being sent
from the client to the server (or at least no other connection requests
are being received by the Shorewall box).
Wilson: Are you sure that the client is supposed to open port 3001 on
the server and not the
2003 Apr 14
1
FW: Re: Open ports
------- BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE -------
From: g.pardon@pi.be
To: teastep@shorewall.net
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Open ports
How am I testing this?
I''m doing a portscan using a portscanner like GFI Languard, Superscanner
and nmap to check. Those two TCP-ports always showed up. Although, I
think there are other to test it.
I read the FAQ and the phenomenon (where is that
2005 Feb 05
0
End of Support for Shorewall 1.4
Effective today, I will no longer offer support for Shorewall 1.4.
Information on upgrading may be found at
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-announce/2004-December/000451.html
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
PGP Public Key \
2003 Feb 26
0
Re: Exchange Server in DMZ (i-hacked.com)
Hiya,
My two cents here .. I use a locked down Linux Sendmail relay (use sendmail
null-client feature on any spare old server or PC) in my DMZ to relay Mail
to the exchange server in my local zone. Its sort of the moat you have to
cross over to get at the castle walls and the hot oil dumped on your head
approach.
Francesca C. Smith
Lady Linux Internet Services
1801 Bolton Street # 1
Baltimore,
2004 Apr 07
0
Version 2.0.1 Samples
When I announced 2.0.1 recently, I absentmindedly neglected to also
publish the 2.0.1 samples. They are now available at:
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Samples/samples-2.0.1/
ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Samples/samples-2.0.1/
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2006 Oct 20
0
Re: Tcrules Helpwith multiISP+ squid& squidguard...
Yessssssssssssssssssss !! THANKSS it Works !!!!
Thanks a lot, if you come to Lille,France I''ll Offer you a big Beer)
Joffrey
-----Message d''origine-----
De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep
Envoyé : jeudi 19 octobre 2006 21:46
À : Shorewall Users
Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tcrules
2007 Mar 26
0
Re: Expected handling of [SYN] when expecting[SYN, ACK]?
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for that, that''s really helped. Netfilter is indeed dropping
the packets as invalid.
Thanks and regards,
Frances
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net]
Sent: 23 March 2007 18:05
To: Shorewall Users
Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Expected handling of [SYN] when
expecting[SYN, ACK]?
Frances Flood wrote:
> Basically, if the