similar to: awk vs. mawk

On Dec 10 23:04:44, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote: > Definitely interested in a cross platform solution to this. Diff below. Please test. On Dec 03 13:21:16, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 30 14:33:47, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > On Nov 26 22:39:27, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > > ./test_replaygain.sh fails for me in tonegenerator(), saying: > > > > > >

On Nov 30 14:33:47, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 26 22:39:27, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > ./test_replaygain.sh fails for me in tonegenerator(), saying: > > > > ./test_replaygain.sh[91]: mawk: not found > > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... -: ERROR: got partial sample > > > > Apparently, the tone-generating awk script does not work with >

(ping, if there is any interest). On Dec 03 13:21:16, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 30 14:33:47, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > On Nov 26 22:39:27, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > > ./test_replaygain.sh fails for me in tonegenerator(), saying: > > > > > > ./test_replaygain.sh[91]: mawk: not found > > > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... -: ERROR:

On Nov 26 22:39:27, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 25 00:43:22, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote: > > http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ > > Please test. > > ./test_replaygain.sh fails for me in tonegenerator(), saying: > > ./test_replaygain.sh[91]: mawk: not found > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... -: ERROR: got partial sample > >

Hi all, As people may have seen there's a pre-release here: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ Specifically: flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit binaries Please test. I'm particularly interested in hearing about the windows binaries which were cross compiled from Linux to Windows. Unfortunately there is a bug

The test is rather simple, and only compares the computed output values for a 1kHz signal at the known filter table sampling frequencies with previously obained golden values. As such, the test only verifies that the performance of the replay gain analyser has not changed. A better test would be to compare the computed value with an independently obtain theorectical value. This is possible by

Earl Chew wrote: > I'm a little reluctant to introduce another compiled program when there are > so many other options that will work well enough out of the box. > > Here are two ideas: > > 1. Use bc(1) to compute the raw samples > 2. Use perl(1) to compute the raw samples > > To generate raw unsigned samples using bc(1) for example: > > samplerate = 1000;

Brian Willoughby wrote: > What about using the C library sin() and cos() functions to generate > the test audio instead of sox? I did not see a description of how > the test files are generated, so maybe this is easy or maybe it is > hard. The benefit of shipping the test audio generation source code > around with the FLAC sources is that the tests won't break when

On Dec 11 00:40:09, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote: > Jan Stary wrote: > > > gawk 4.0.1 and 4.1.1 works for me too. > > > > Erik, do you please remember what exactly happened here: > > https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=5797009fa2beb0426d74485e7624775e2e58e1d1 > > > > Unfortunately I don't remember. > > > Does gawk >= 4.0.1 still

On Nov 25 00:43:22, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote: > http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ > Please test. ./test_replaygain.sh fails for me in tonegenerator(), saying: ./test_replaygain.sh[91]: mawk: not found Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... -: ERROR: got partial sample Apparently, the tone-generating awk script does not work with my system's awk, which is

On Nov 25 00:43:22, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote: > http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ > Please test. Running 'make fullcheck' fails for me like this: $ pwd /home/hans/src/flac-1.3.1pre1/test $ make fullcheck FLAC__TEST_LEVEL=1 FLAC__TEST_WITH_VALGRIND=no ./test_libFLAC.sh /bin/sh: ./test_libFLAC.sh: No such file or directory *** Error 1 in

Op 25-11-14 om 23:39 schreef Jan Stary: > Is there a reason the test scripts are calling bash? The change from sh to bash was made a little more than a year ago. The mailing list thread accompanying this change can be found here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-September/004374.html

The FLAC 1.1.2 release candidate is now available at http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.1.2-beta.tar.gz?download Only the source tarball is available. I am putting out the beta first so that package maintainers and others can smoke test the build/install/check process before the official one goes out, since we've had problems before. Everyone that can, please download and try:

Erik, It turns out bc(1) is too accurate, and a little slow, for this purpose. I've switched to using awk(1) which uses floating point. Do you feel I need to test for the presence of awk(1) ? It is specified as one of the standard commands in the LSB : http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/LSB_1.0.0/gLSB/command.html Earl ??? awk -- ' ??? BEGIN { ??????????? samplerate = 8000;

Seems time is going to be a constraint for me in the coming week, but I'll try and get more of these out to you as fast as I can get them written and tested. Keeping the patches in a separate branch for now seems like a good idea to me. Attached is a patch for 'test_streams.sh' On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com>wrote: > Jaren

test_replaygain.sh fails because it calls flac with --endian=big --channels=1 --bps=24 --sample-rate=$1 --sign=unsigned but without --force-raw-format option. The patch is attached. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: test_rg.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 446 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Not only test_replaygain.sh (commit 1988855), but also test_flac.sh requires additional --force-raw-format option. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: test_flac.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2176 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20140709/1ab42e3d/attachment.obj

On Nov 26 01:25:25, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 25 23:56:05, mvanb1 at gmail.com wrote: > > Op 25-11-14 om 23:39 schreef Jan Stary: > > > Is there a reason the test scripts are calling bash? > > > > The change from sh to bash was made a little more than a year > > ago. The mailing list thread accompanying this change can be > > found here: >

On 24-04-13 14:34, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > That's an error in the awk script, which is embedded in the shell > script. I know GNU awk supports lshift, maybe BSD awk doesn't. I'll > investigate that futher. On my system awk links to mawk 1.3.3 >> I don't know why, but the test continues and says all tests passed while >> that clearly isn't the

I'm a little reluctant to introduce another compiled program when there are so many other options that will work well enough out of the box. Here are two ideas: 1. Use bc(1) to compute the raw samples 2. Use perl(1) to compute the raw samples To generate raw unsigned samples using bc(1) for example: samplerate = 1000; duration = 2; bitspersample = 24; samplerange = 2 ^ (bitspersample-1) -