Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "PATCH for encode.c, format_input()"
2013 Jul 18
1
Bland Altman summary stats for all column combinations
Hello,
I have the following data.frame
structure(list(Study = structure(c(1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 7L,
8L, 9L, 10L, 11L, 12L, 13L, 14L, 15L, 16L, 17L, 18L, 19L, 1L,
2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 7L, 8L, 9L, 10L, 11L, 12L, 13L, 14L, 15L,
16L, 17L, 18L, 19L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 7L, 8L, 9L, 10L,
11L, 12L, 13L, 14L, 15L, 16L, 17L, 18L, 19L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L,
5L, 6L, 7L, 8L, 9L, 10L, 11L, 12L, 13L, 14L,
2013 Sep 29
2
MSVS: debug flac.exe uses release libogg_static.lib
With current settings, MSVS links debug version of flac.exe (and other .exe and .dll files) with the release version of libogg_static.lib. MSVS issues a "warning LNK4098: defaultlib 'libcmt.lib' conflicts with use of other libs; use /NODEFAULTLIB:library"
What's the reason in this setting?
What is better:
* to change the settings so that MSVS will link debug .exe files with
2014 Feb 01
1
PATCH for bitmath.h
FLAC__bitmath_ilog2_wide() function is still problematic:
1) it cannot be compiled with MSVS
2) it returns correct results only when compiles with GNUC
3) it mentions LGPL which isn't good for a BSD-licensed library
Here's the patch that should fix these issues.
(about LGPL -> CC0 change: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-September/004356.html )
-------------- next part
2014 Sep 20
3
vsnprintf_s and vsnprintf
lvqcl wrote:
> Why? We can use vsnprintf_s for MSVS, and vsnprintf for MinGW.
>
> MSVS version of vsnprintf_s is located inside (statically linked) msvcp???.lib
> or (dynamically linked) msvcp???.dll. They are part of MSVS runtime, and compatible
> with WinXP. So it is safe to use it in FLAC.
Oh, ok. I missed this bit. I know so very little about Windows.
However, if you compile
2013 Oct 09
3
PATCH for rice_parameter calculation
MSVS profiler shows that the following code in stream_encoder.c takes
several percent of CPU time:
for(rice_parameter = 0, k = partition_samples; k < mean; rice_parameter++, k <<= 1)
;
this code is equivalent to:
rice_parameter = 0; k = partition_samples;
while(k < mean) {
rice_parameter++; k <<= 1;
}
The idea was to accelerate it:
2008 May 17
1
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again
SimplifyLibCalls.cpp is no longer part of Transforms\IPO and
Transforms\Scalar\SimplifyCFG.cpp is renamed to SimplifyCFG.cpp or
something to that effect ( I didn't look up the actual checkins ).
Having fixed that, I still can't get through the build:
Creating library C:\work\s\llvm\win32\\bin\Win32\Debug/opt.lib and
object C:\work\s\llvm\win32\\bin\Win32\Debug/opt.exp
1>opt.obj : error
2016 Sep 01
2
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Nico Weber via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > As mentioned upthread, we're still on update 2 for various reasons.
>
> Do you mind elaborating on those reasons?
Off the top of my head, clang-cl couldn't handle the code
2014 May 04
1
Bug: incompatibility with MSVS 2005
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> because MSVS2005 doesn't provide stdint.h. According to MSDN,
>> uintptr_t is defined in "STDDEF.H and other include files".
>
> Does the rest of FLAC actually support those compilers?
Yes. I removed this #include and all projects were successfully
built with MSVS 2005 Express.
> Is it worth
> continuing to support them?
* At
2013 Sep 29
2
MSVS: debug flac.exe uses release libogg_static.lib
Ralph Giles wrote:
>> With current settings, MSVS links debug version of flac.exe (and other
>> .exe and .dll files) with the release version of libogg_static.lib.
>> MSVS issues a "warning LNK4098: defaultlib 'libcmt.lib' conflicts with use
>> of other libs; use /NODEFAULTLIB:library"
>
> Sounds like a bug. Debug targets should link to debug builds
2017 Jan 06
1
[PATCH 5/5] win_utf8_io: Avoid forbidden functions when building for WinRT/UWP
Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen <hugo at beauzee.fr> wrote:
> ---
> src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c
> b/src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c
> index c61d27f3..1437b41e 100644
> --- a/src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c
> +++ b/src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c
>
2018 May 02
3
Question: MSVS 2005/2008 support?
By default, FLAC requires ogg library. Support of old versions of
Visual Studio was removed from libogg code about 2 years ago:
https://git.xiph.org/?p=ogg.git;a=commit;h=18c401c6bc8814d06f3ae53ebf5d4399f90871cc
libogg 1.3.3 (released 2017-11-07) cannot be built with MSVS 2005/2008 anymore.
Are there any developers that want to use libFLAC in their programs
and still use Visual Studio 2005 or
2014 May 03
4
Bug: incompatibility with MSVS 2005
src/libFLAC/memory.c cannot be compiled with MSVS 2005 (and
probably VS2008 too) after this commit:
http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commitdiff;h=7cbecbae9f70be770f7651d09531fec0de6f9cf5
because MSVS2005 doesn't provide stdint.h. According to MSDN,
uintptr_t is defined in "STDDEF.H and other include files".
2016 Sep 01
2
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC
I frequently see mention of how upgrading is problematic, is there anyone
here for whom upgrading msvc versions is problematic? It seems like we keep
talking in hypotheticals, but I'd like to hear from someone for whom it is
*actually* a problem, and why.
Vs community is permissive enough now that licensing isn't an issue. And
every time this comes up it seems like we're saying
2016 Sep 01
2
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC
As mentioned upthread, we're still on update 2 for various reasons.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>
wrote:
> Hi Reid, first off thanks *very* much for all your help fixing
> 2013-related problems. We really appreciate it.
>
>
>
> Let me propose a target date of September 15 for advancing the minimum MS
> compiler to
2016 Aug 31
3
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC
I'd like to revisit this. As a person who spends a fair amount of time
monitoring our VS 2013 buildbots, I would say that I am ready to throw in
the towel on MSVC 2013. Since this discussion, I have committed five (!)
workarounds for MSVC 2013:
# in llvm
$ git log --author=rnk --grep=2013 --after='Aug 4 2016' --oneline
21a8ade Fix the MSVC 2013 build by using Elf_Word instead of
2020 Oct 02
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: preferred way to return expected values
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:48 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
> Thanks, David!
>
>
> Few minor additions to the topic:
>
>
> > I'm not sure which MSVC version on godbolt would be "MSVC 2017" that
> the LLVM docs refer to
>
>
> I've found that the minimal available version of MSVC on
> godbolt is "WINE MSVC 2015:
2020 Oct 01
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: preferred way to return expected values
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:08 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I've performed an experiment with the code below at godbolt.
> (used -O2, https://godbolt.org/z/nY95nh)
>
> ```
> #include <vector>
> #include "llvm/Support/Error.h"
>
> llvm::Expected<std::vector<int>> foo() {
> std::vector<int> V;
>
2014 Mar 21
2
About "attempt to fix differences between x86 FPU and SSE calculations"
More specifically, about this patch: http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commitdiff;h=70b078cfd5f9d4b0692c33f018cac3c652b14f90
I downloaded the latest code from git (flac-70b078c), disabled
all SSE optimizations in the code and compiled it (GCC 4.8.2).
This patch doesn't change FLAC output.
Either gcc is too smart and optimizes this new code back to the old,
or this fix is MSVS-specific. Or
2014 Apr 09
1
[PATCH] Suppress MSVS warnings for lpc.c
When compiling lpc.c for x86-64 architecture MSVS issues warnings:
warning C4028: formal parameter _N_ different from declaration
because of flac_restrict modifier. This patch suppresses these warnings.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lpc-msvs-warnings.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1025 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
2018 Apr 03
3
how to build 64bit xapian using MSVC2017?
hi, Olly Betts,
Thank you for you answer.
My xapian version is 1.2.8.
Need I upgrade it to 1.4 if I want to build it with MSVC2017 x64?
lishu at fiberhome.com
From: Olly Betts
Date: 2018-03-29 11:10
To: 李澍; xapian-discuss
Subject: Re: how to build 64bit xapian using MSVC2017?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 08:28:24PM +0000, Olly Betts wrote:
> Related to this, the appveyor build is