similar to: Exact FLAC subset constraints

I'm misleading about FLAC subset constraints... Please help me understand exact FLAC subset limitation.

I mean that the first statement [Subset streams must use one of 192/576/1152/2304/4608/256/512/1024/2048/4096 (and 8192/16384 if the sample rate is >48kHz).] published on https://www.xiph.org/flac/documentation_tools_flac.html#flac_options_blocksize page IS NOT EQUAL to second statement [The blocksize bits in the frame header must be 0001-1110. The blocksize must be <=16384; if the sample

>>>>>>>>> I'm misleading about FLAC subset constraints... Please help me >>>>>>>>> understand exact FLAC subset limitation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From https://www.xiph.org/flac/documentation_tools_flac.html#flac_options_blocksize: >>>>>>>>>

Any progress? > I agree. Please keep up informed. >> FLAC__format_blocksize_is_subset() was introduced by commit #8ab0138 >> (https://gitorious.org/flac/flac/commit/8ab013837d379d3d1fa84eac5420faec41852fd7) >> over 5 years ago and available in the latest stable release 1.3.0. >> >> It would be nice if the official FLAC documentation used common >> adopted

I mean that the first statement [Subset streams must use one of 192/576/1152/2304/4608/256/512/1024/2048/4096 (and 8192/16384 if the sample rate is >48kHz).] published on https://www.xiph.org/flac/documentation_tools_flac.html#flac_options_blocksize page IS NOT EQUAL to second statement [The blocksize bits in the frame header must be 0001-1110. The blocksize must be <=16384; if the sample

I think you've found a bug, Bart. flac 1.2.1 did not have any FLAC__format_blocksize_is_subset() function, so the source you're seeing in format.c must be new. If the format documentation you linked to is correct, then either the specifications are self-contradictory, or the code is not implementing the subset checks as described. My interpretation is that blocksize bits of 0110

Op 11-12-14 om 10:05 schreef Miroslav Lichvar: > but I'd rather see the real seeking bug fixed instead I think I might have a fix, but it touches quite a bit of code, so it'll take some time. I think the problem is that because bogus headers might pop up in the stream of which the CRC checks out, the whole frame is decoded to validate that a frame is correct. The bogus header

Lots of comments throughout this one... On Jan 7, 2011, at 15:28, Declan Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 02:22:51PM -0800, brianw at sounds.wa.com wrote: >> However, you should be aware that many modern producers use software >> to create their music, and when the software stores sound clips in >> MP3 format, what you end up with is music that sometimes looks like

Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, I remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster as well. I believe some of the techniques used in libflake were added to libFLAC in 1.1.4. However, some of the improved compression in flake was due to options that are outside the FLAC 'subset', such as larger blocksize, greater number of

Hi I am thinking of ripping albums to a single flac file with embedded cuesheet. As track and index points have to be on a 588 sample boundary due to the CD TOC standard working in 588 sample frames, I thought it may be beneficial to rip CDs with a blocksize of 588 samples. According to the format page on sourcefourge a stream is subset if "The blocksize bits in the frame header must be

> check the resulting file for subset blocksizes, sample rates, bits per sample, LPC filter order and rice partition order. That's all parameters that I need to check? FLAC tools have a lots of warnings about non-subset files during encoding, but unfortunately don't have easy way to check/test existing FLAC stream for subset compliance. "flac -a" generates the big text file

Hello Is it planned someday to implement additional higher (9-12) compression modes like in Flake? http://flake-enc.sourceforge.net/ It's not very important I think. Harddrive space isn't problem today. But it preserves other indepentent work done on Flac and give room for some extra albums on harddrive. I think development of flake is stopped. I plan to test my ~20 GB flac

?hel kenal p?eval (neljap?ev, 14. m?rts 2013 19:02:35) kirjutas Declan Kelly: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:06:51PM -0400, benski at winamp.com wrote: > > Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, I > > remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster as > > well. I believe some of the techniques used in libflake were added to

> I was wrong about it going up to 11 - it actually goes up to 12. Too bad. I thought for a minute there that it goes up to eleven because... "Well, it's one louder, isn't it? It's not ten. You see, most blokes, you know, will be playing at ten. You're on ten here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on ten on your guitar. Where can you go from

Hi I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode it to WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message above still decodable to WAV (and how can you do this, because flac.exe doesn't want to decode the file), even if there is a MD5 signature mismatch, or is this not possible at all? thx

I would also add that the "level" is only relevant to the reference encoder, as it is an alias to quickly set a number of parameters. Other encoders might make different choices. Also, I haven't looked in details at how the encoder works, but I think it is based on heuristics to decide which is the best compression method for a set of samples, and I'm not sure that it would give

Op 07-02-12 19:50, Ralph Giles schreef: > Basically the audio is chopped into a blocks and each block is coded > either uncompressed, as a constant value (good for silence), or with > linear predictive coding plus a rice-coded residual. I don't know how > the encoder decides where to put the block boundaries. AFAIK, FLAC uses a fixed block length so block boundaries are just put

I am working on creating a set of FLAC files for a ?decoder compliance test corpus? and am looking for examples of things that are part of the standard but not supported in the reference decoder. I am not looking for things missing from the reference encoder (such as variable block sizes). I seem to recall someone on this list (most likely lvqcl or Martijn van Beurden) mentioning something about

Hi! Can anyone name hardware decoders that can't decode non-subset FLAC stream? Which hardware device or software fails for mismatch of any conditions described at http://xiph.org/flac/format.html#subset? Thanks in advance!

Hjalmar, I recall that many hardware decoders have a limit on the level that they can handle. At the very least, hardware encoders may only support a subset of the compression levels. As for the decoders, I cannot remember specifically whether they are all capable of decoding all compression levels (it certainly would be more convenient). My memory from discussions on this mailing list