similar to: Exact FLAC subset constraints

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Exact FLAC subset constraints"

2014 Jan 09
3
Exact FLAC subset constraints
Any progress? > I agree. Please keep up informed. >> FLAC__format_blocksize_is_subset() was introduced by commit #8ab0138 >> (https://gitorious.org/flac/flac/commit/8ab013837d379d3d1fa84eac5420faec41852fd7) >> over 5 years ago and available in the latest stable release 1.3.0. >> >> It would be nice if the official FLAC documentation used common >> adopted
2014 Jan 06
0
Exact FLAC subset constraints
I mean that the first statement [Subset streams must use one of 192/576/1152/2304/4608/256/512/1024/2048/4096 (and 8192/16384 if the sample rate is >48kHz).] published on https://www.xiph.org/flac/documentation_tools_flac.html#flac_options_blocksize page IS NOT EQUAL to second statement [The blocksize bits in the frame header must be 0001-1110. The blocksize must be <=16384; if the sample
2014 Jan 07
0
Exact FLAC subset constraints
I think you've found a bug, Bart. flac 1.2.1 did not have any FLAC__format_blocksize_is_subset() function, so the source you're seeing in format.c must be new. If the format documentation you linked to is correct, then either the specifications are self-contradictory, or the code is not implementing the subset checks as described. My interpretation is that blocksize bits of 0110
2014 Jan 13
0
Exact FLAC subset constraints
>>>>>>>>> I'm misleading about FLAC subset constraints... Please help me >>>>>>>>> understand exact FLAC subset limitation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From https://www.xiph.org/flac/documentation_tools_flac.html#flac_options_blocksize: >>>>>>>>>
2014 Jan 03
1
Exact FLAC subset constraints
I'm misleading about FLAC subset constraints... Please help me understand exact FLAC subset limitation.
2006 Jun 08
1
How can I recreate STREAMINFO metadata?
I have some FLACs that have STREAMINFO that looks like this: METADATA block #0 type: 0 (STREAMINFO) is last: false length: 34 minumum blocksize: 4608 samples maximum blocksize: 4608 samples minimum framesize: 0 bytes maximum framesize: 0 bytes sample_rate: 44100 Hz channels: 2 bits-per-sample: 16 total samples: 0 MD5 signature: 00000000000000000000000000000000 (This came
2004 Sep 10
1
problems with flac?
So I recently encoded my entire CD collection (over 7000 songs) to flac and I have found that 18 of them have a strange problem.  The files are corrupted in some way.. They will stop playing abruptly in the middle of the song.  I've attached a listing of the metadata and you'll see what I mean.  You can see that the seek points toward the end have a bunch of zeros and I'm not sure
2018 Nov 25
1
libflac doesn't find more than one metadata block
Hello, I'm currently doing a little music player using libflac and libao. What I've currently done works as it should, but I have a problem where only one metadata block is detected, even if there are more (it doesn't have the last attribute set to true). This is using flac 1.3.2 on Gentoo amd64. The main code file is attached, it mainly follows the examples given with the libflac
2008 May 20
4
are 588 sample frames subset or nonsubset?
Hi I am thinking of ripping albums to a single flac file with embedded cuesheet. As track and index points have to be on a 588 sample boundary due to the CD TOC standard working in 588 sample frames, I thought it may be beneficial to rip CDs with a blocksize of 588 samples. According to the format page on sourcefourge a stream is subset if "The blocksize bits in the frame header must be
2006 Sep 06
2
Getting subframe type=verbatim on 16 bit files
I'm using libFLACC++ and libFLAC and I think that I'm using the calls in the typical order (see code below). But every monoe or stereo file that I send thru I get files that are the same sze as the orginal wave files. Doing a flac -a on the flac files I see that I get: frame=9 blocksize=4608 sample_rate=8000 channels=1 channel_assignment=INDEPENDENT subframe=0
2004 Sep 10
1
AW: AW: Incomplete format description?
Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <Tor-Einar_Jarnbjo@grosch- link.de>: >According to the format description, the coding method has to be 0. > >I've been using libFLAC 1.0.4 to encode the stream. I've checked my interpretation against "flac -a" and it seems to read 17 bits for each warmup sample. Here is its output: frame=168 blocksize=4608
2006 Jul 24
3
Problem with CRAM and flac-1.1.2
A user of CRAM (http://swami.sourceforge.net/cram.php) sent in a bug report related to decoding of CRAM files. This issue occurs with flac-1.1.2 but not previous versions (such as flac-1.1.1). Note that the same file is used for this test (hopefully ruling out any issue with the encoder). Details of the issue: When calling FLAC__stream_decoder_process_single() the error callback is triggered
2004 Sep 10
3
1.0 source candidate
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:14:55PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:51:11PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > > > This version seems to work at least partially on ia64. I am able > > to encode my > > > usual test WAV file now, but I still get a segfault during the > >
2007 Jan 16
3
Help upgrading to 1.1.3 (MD5 sum issues, album art corrupts files)
Hello all, I recently upgraded the libFLAC used in my application Max (http:// sbooth.org/Max/) to 1.1.3 and added preliminary support for album art. During the upgrade I evidently made some coding mistakes with interesting results. I've combed everything over and can't quite see the problems. I've become somewhat frustrated because my code didn't really change
2014 Jun 18
1
Please help me understand what values of FFMPEG's "compression_level" preset generate subset FLAC stream and what not-subset?
Please help me understand what values of FFMPEG's "compression_level" preset generate subset FLAC stream and what not-subset? Default value of compression_level for FFMPEG's FLAC encoder is 5. FLAC specific encoder parameters: Encoder flac [FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec)]: Threading capabilities: no Supported sample formats: s16 s32 FLAC encoder AVOptions:
2005 Sep 14
1
block size
Hi, we are implementing FLAC decode on an embedded device. FLAC, as you know, can have block sizes up to ~65K. For an embedded implementation, memory is limited: what would be the maximum block size we should support? We have seen the encoder encodes either 1152 or 4608 in its default setup. Should we support other block sizes? Also another unrelated question: given most existing files
2006 Nov 16
2
Re: Problem with CRAM and flac-1.1.2
sorry if I did not reply to this, answers below: --- Josh Green <josh@resonance.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 06:37 +0200, Josh Green wrote: > > A user of CRAM (http://swami.sourceforge.net/cram.php) sent in a > bug > > report related to decoding of CRAM files. This issue occurs with > > flac-1.1.2 but not previous versions (such as flac-1.1.1). Note >
2013 Feb 21
5
BTRFS fails defragging
Hi folks, I''m using Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal with # uname -r 3.5.0-24-generic And it seems I cannot defrag : # filefrag /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic: 3 extents found # btrfs filesystem defrag /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic # echo $? 20 # filefrag /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic: 3 extents found Any clue
2005 Sep 30
2
Reg. FLAC decoding
I'm using seekable_stream_decoder, And., this is my write_callback. I'm not getting the required output. The PCM i get is not the proper music. Am I doing something wrong here? FLAC__StreamDecoderWriteStatus AFLACStreamPlayer::StreamWriteCb ( const FLAC__SeekableStreamDecoder *decoder, const FLAC__Frame *frame, const FLAC__int32 * const buffer[], void *client_data) { int Channels,
2007 Jul 25
1
Bug: flac --replay-gain thinks that I used --no-padding
Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain > > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding > > option... > > > > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with > > --no-padding" > > > > ...even though I'm