similar to: Shorewall 2.0.6

This release back-ports the DROPINVALID shorewall.conf option from 2.2.0. 1) Recent 2.6 kernels include code that evaluates TCP packets based on TCP Window analysis. This can cause packets that were previously classified as NEW or ESTABLISHED to be classified as INVALID. The new kernel code can be disabled by including this command in your /etc/shorewall/init file: echo 1

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta8 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta8 Problems Corrected: 1. A typo in the /etc/shorewall/interfaces file has been corrected. 2. Previously, the "add" and "delete" commands were generating incorrect policy matches when policy match support was available. New

This will be my last 2.2 release. It contains a couple of small bug fixes that I had laying around. http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.5 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.5 1) Previously, if PKTTYPE=No in shorewall.conf then pkttype match would still be used if the kernel supported it. 2) A typo in the ''tunnel'' script has been corrected

After gaining some experience with the new release model, it has become apparent to me that a small adjustment is warrented. I previously announced that updates to the stable release would only contain bug fixes. I''m modifying that slightly to allow for small low-risk enhancements; large and/or risky enhancements will still be restricted to the development release. We have seen this

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In this release: 1) Dynamic Ipsec Zones now work. 2) Output Traffic Accounting by user/group is supported (thanks to Tuomas Jormola). 3) The following negative test options are added in /etc/shorewall/ipsec and /etc/shorewall/masq: reqid!=<number> spi!=<number> proto!=esp|ah|ipcomp mode!=tunnel|transport

Hi Tom, Thank you for your quick reply. I aplied changes as you suppose, and now users can comunicate each with others. - thank you very much. I have just one aditional question regarding PKTTYPE=No variable. I didnt find it in shorewall.conf so I simply add it at the end of conf file (above #Last line :-) ) So question is it is standard feature of shorewall, and from which version it is

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The

FYI... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44 From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca> To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net> I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I noticed I completely forgot

(Sorry, my previous post was sent in HTML format) I am having a hell of a time with shorewall... I have a Dlink DCM202 Cable modem with the Ethernet connected directly to eth0 on the linux box. Then I have a second nic on the linux box connected to a hub for the internal network. I am trying to allow traffic from the internet connect to my FTP and WEB servers on my Winbloze box on the lan.

Hi I have 2nic firewall . I had to open some ranges of udp and tcp ports . I faced a problem that although all the ports are open Some functionality was not working . Any body used shorewall with H323 Voip traffic DNATed . Any help is appretiated . Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: <shorewall-users-request@lists.shorewall.net> To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent:

I''ve gotten the basic code working on my firewall. So that I can quickly get back online if I screw up, I''m currently calling it shorewall2. That way if it screws up I can just "shorewall restart". /sbin/shorewall2 -- command interpreter /etc/shorewall2/ -- configuration files /usr/share/shorewall2/ -- shared files Both Shorewall and Shorewall2 use the

Currently I have shorewal 2.2 installed om my debian 2.6.8 kernel. The firewall machine can access the internet via a ethernet modem fine. The firewall can ping the local network. The local network can ping the firewall server, see the samba files. Howeven teh local network cannot access the internet through the firewall Any suggestions? Rob van Overbruggen Settings and stats: Server: Eth1 :

(if this post gets line-feed-mangled please read http://www.dl.reneschmidt.de/shorewallxenpost.txt - that''s an unmangled version, thank you) Hello, first I would like to thank the Mr. Eastep and contributors for this great piece of software and superb documentation. I have a SOHO server (Debian testing) that I''m using for several purposes so I''ve set up a Xen

Thanks for such a quick reply Tom! Any suggestions then as to what I might do other than putting a second nic in the SBS and opening it up for web access? I don''t like the idea, but since MS SBS includes fireall that is actually what MS suggests. Boyd -----Original Message----- From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] Sent: January 3, 2005 3:05 PM To: Shorewall Users Cc: Boyd

Believe me: Read the FAQ Checked over and over This might be toooooo stupid to be documented. Please bear with me. Any help ? Situation: single card standalone "firewall" (used like a "personal firewall"). Have sshd running on the FW. Want the sshd daemon to be accessible only from 2 LANs: 1) My other home LAN machine 2) IBM intranet machines (9.0.0.0) Whatever I have

FYI -- A small blurb on page 45. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Shorewall in (IN)SECURE Magazine Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:10:51 +0200 From: Mirko Zorz <mirko.zorz@net-security.org> To: teastep@shorewall.net Hello Tom, I thought you would be interested to know that Shorewall has been featured in the Software Spotlight section of the third issue of (IN)SECURE, a free security

Plus I would like to let you know that it works like a charm. Snort can now see those packets. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Thibodeau, Jamie L. Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:25 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline

Alex Martin has completed installation of a new server in the San Jose area and we''ve switched the DNS CNAME records for www.shorewall.net and ftp.shorewall.net to point to that new server. Please let us know if there are problems. My personal thanks go to Alex for his continuing contribution to Shorewall. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool

Carl Raeside wrote: > Tom, > > How is it going? Quick questions. > > 1. the link to the Mandrake rpms seems to not have the shorewall rpm in > it. http://www.monkeynoodle.org/comp/net/shorewall/ > > 2. this link seems to be dead any other sources ? Iproute ? > > Iproute ("ip" utility). The iproute package is included with most > distributions