similar to: shorewall.net is back on line

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "shorewall.net is back on line"

2004 Nov 06
3
shorewall.net Down Time
Tomorrow morning, the following systems will be unavailable while I upgrade the OS on my firewall: a) shorewall.net b) lists.shorewall.net c) cvs.shorewall.net d) rsync.shorewall.net The upgrade will begin around 0700 PST (-0800) and will like take two hours or so. Sorry for the inconvenience. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \
2007 May 16
1
www.shorewall.net/ftp.shorewall.net is down
The administrator of the main web/ftp site has informed me that the site is currently down. Until service is restored, you can use: http://www1.shorewall.net ftp://ftp1.shorewall.net Sorry for the inconvenience. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \
2004 Sep 23
0
Fwd: RE: 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall
FYI... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44 From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca> To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net> I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I noticed I completely forgot
2004 Jul 12
0
shorewall.net down time
Today I am having a new DSL line installed. Once the line is in and operational, I will be moving my local network from the old line to the new; I am expecting minimal down time (an hour or two) but as those of you who have been involved in such things know, there is no way of knowing what disasters are going to happen. Services impacted will be: http://shorewall.net (a.k.a.,
2004 Nov 02
3
Shorewall 2.2.0 Beta 2
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The
2004 Nov 02
0
Shorewall 2.2.0 Beta 2
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The
2004 Dec 31
0
Change in Shorewall Mailing Lists
Because certain large European ISPs can''t get their act together WRT SPF, I''ve turned on masquerading of lists.shorewall.net. This means that list postings will now have "shorewall.net" sender addresses rather than "lists.shorewall.net". Sorry for the inconvenience but a lot of email is currently bouncing. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a
2004 Nov 11
0
Shorewall.net downtime again this weekend
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, I will be rebuilding my server. I expect the project to take most of the day. I will begin around 7AM PST (-0800). The server hosts the following sites: www1.shorewall.net (a.k.a. shorewall.net) ftp1.shorewall.net lists.shorewall.net rsync.shorewall.net Sorry for the inconvenience. - -Tom - -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof
2004 Sep 29
0
Re: Shorewall-users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 65
Hi I have 2nic firewall . I had to open some ranges of udp and tcp ports . I faced a problem that although all the ports are open Some functionality was not working . Any body used shorewall with H323 Voip traffic DNATed . Any help is appretiated . Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: <shorewall-users-request@lists.shorewall.net> To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent:
2004 Jun 01
3
Shorewall.net Downtime this Weekend
The following systems will be down this weekend for server rebuild: shorewall.net lists.shorewall.net www1.shorewall.net ftp1.shorewall.net rsync.shorewall.net cvs.shorewall.net This will affect: Shorewall site and archive search Mailing list archives Mailing lists CVS Primary DNS for shorewall.net I will start the rebuild on Saturday morning and hope to be done by Saturday
2005 May 15
1
Shorewall 2.3.1
This is the latest development release and may be found at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.3/shorewall-2.3.1 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.3/shorewall-2.3.1 This release changes the way that SAVE_IPSETS=Yes works to try to make it harder to shoot yourself in the foot. Read the release notes carefully. In addition, there are two problems corrected: 1) A typo in the
2004 Jun 06
0
shorewall.net is back up
I believe that the rebuild of my server has been a success. Please report any problems that you notice. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2005 Sep 20
0
Fwd: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet
FYI This bug will prevent ''shorewall restore'' from working if you have "!<single IP address>" in the ORIGINAL DEST column. -Tom ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet Date: Wednesday 14 September 2005 15:09 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org The conntrack
2005 Jan 03
1
RE: Outlook Web Access behind shorewall firewalldoesn''t work
Thanks for such a quick reply Tom! Any suggestions then as to what I might do other than putting a second nic in the SBS and opening it up for web access? I don''t like the idea, but since MS SBS includes fireall that is actually what MS suggests. Boyd -----Original Message----- From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] Sent: January 3, 2005 3:05 PM To: Shorewall Users Cc: Boyd
2005 Mar 30
1
RE: Shorewall and an inline IDS(snort-inlineorhogwash)
Plus I would like to let you know that it works like a charm. Snort can now see those packets. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Thibodeau, Jamie L. Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:25 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline
2005 Mar 15
2
New feature for Shorewall 2.2.3
The following is taken from the Release notes for 2.2.3 (which will be released in a month or so). 2) There has been ongoing confusion about how the /etc/shorewall/routestopped file works. People understand how it works with the ''shorewall stop'' command but when they read that ''shorewall restart'' is logically equivalent to ''shorewall
2005 Feb 24
2
Re: 2.2 shorewall installation fails on suse 9.2
Laurent Moix wrote: > Hi, > > I try to install shorewall 2.2 on suse 9.2. > > # rpm -ivh --nodeps /root/shorewall-2.2.1-1.noarch.rpm > Preparing... ########################################### [100%] > 1:shorewall ########################################### [100%] > shorewall: unknown service > shorewall: not a runlevel service > >
2004 Aug 16
2
Re: [Shorewall-announce] Shorewall 2.1.4
Magnus Hyllander wrote: > > I guess what I''m wondering is, how does Shorewall (netfilter) know which > zone a certain road warrior belongs to? I''ve just completed getting dynamic zones working with ipsec again. A dynamic IPSEC zone is defined in /etc/shorewall/zones by following the short name (first column) with ":ipsec". The code is in CVS. There are a
2004 Jul 13
0
Shorewall 2.1.1
My new DSL line came complete with a new Modem that is configured/monitored from a web browser. That inspired me to add a couple of new features to to the masq file which you can find in 2.1.1 (see attached release notes, New Feature 2). The modem has IP address 192.168.1.1 and is connected to eth0. My local network is 192.168.1.0/24 and is connected to eth2 which has IP address
2004 Sep 21
2
Development Release Support (Shorewall 2.1.*)
As part of my effort to back away from the primary Shorewall support role, I am going to change the way that Development releases are supported. It was my hope that Development releases would be used primarily by people who need the new functionality in those releases but I am seeing a small but steady stream of posts on the Development list asking questions about initial installation and