similar to: Back from hiatus

From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> >To: flac-dev at xiph.org >Cc: Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com> >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:42 PM >Subject: Re: [flac-dev] [Flac-dev] Git branch with compiling fixes for win32 > >Josh Coalson wrote: > >> But regardless of submitter, any patch that affects encoding must be >> reviewed very

checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release of flac scheduled for monday. if anyone can try building it and even better running the test suite, and reporting back any problems, that will help me get things in better shape. changelog: http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/flac/flac/doc/html/changelog.html?revision=HEAD TIA, Josh

Josh Coalson wrote: > I haven't checked git yet but I hope this patch has not gone in.? I > don't like the special case that this is creating. > > It would be better to allow MM:SS everywhere but I consider that low priority. I modified version of that patch did go in. See the following commits:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:36:15 -0800 (PST) Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, thanks, checked in, everything working now? Well I did a fresh checkout of CVS head. This seems to be missing my second patch, but I think thats because you may not have actually commited it yet, just decided to commit it :-). After manually getting rid of the -force_cpusubtype_ALL it compiles. I also

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:08:21 -0800 (PST) Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Is there someway of figuring out if a sample rate is valid? > > that's the right way. But it doesn't tell me that the sample rate is invalid it tells me FLAC__SEEKABLE_STREAM_ENCODER_STREAM_ENCODER_ERROR or FLAC__STREAM_ENCODER_NOT_STREAMABLE. > the reason it's being rejected is

Hi all, I'm trying to use the FLAC C libraries to encode audio. I'm doing something like: FLAC__seekable_stream_encoder_set_channels(pflac->fse, 1); FLAC__seekable_stream_encoder_set_sample_rate(pflac->fse, 11025); FLAC__seekable_stream_encoder_set_bits_per_sample(pflac->fse, 8); if ((bps = FLAC__seekable_stream_encoder_init(pflac->fse)) !=

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:45:05 -0800 (PST) Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, thanks, checked in. once linux-ppc is ironed out the > release should be ready to go. Long way to go yet. Mine is a G3 PowerPC so it doesn't have Altivec. I've tried --disable-assembler but there's still something screwed up int the Makefile.am. Erik --

(Jumping in again, maybe at the wrong point since this doesn't seem to involve encoding, but here goes.) Miroslav's patches have always been high-quality for sure.? But regardless of submitter, any patch that affects encoding must be reviewed very carefully, preferably by several other people and definitely me.? If there were ever a libFLAC release that had a bug and was not always

Hi there, I was quite joyed to discover that at least this mailing list has activity, and that there is even an active git project for flac... because until then, I was firmly under the impression that flac is dead, and has been dead for years. Last website update 3 years ago, last release 5 years ago; tons of unfixed security and data corruption bugs, tons of not integrated patches on the

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:33:42 -0800 (PST) Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd-flac@mega-nerd.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:08:21 -0800 (PST) > > Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > Is there someway of figuring out if a sample rate is valid? > > > > > > that's the

When reading the INDEX from the cue sheet, the format MM:SS:FF format is disallowed if the sample frequency is not a multiple of 75 because the index would only be approximate. However, 00:00:00 is _exact_ because it denotes the start of the track, so allow it as a special case. This allows metaflac_test.sh to pass. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:39:18 -0800 (PST) Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd-flac@mega-nerd.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:45:05 -0800 (PST) > > Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > OK, thanks, checked in. once linux-ppc is ironed out the > > > release should be ready to go. > >

Hi all, As people may have seen there's a pre-release here: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ Specifically: flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit binaries Please test. I'm particularly interested in hearing about the windows binaries which were cross compiled from Linux to Windows. Unfortunately there is a bug

--- Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd-flac@mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Harry Sack wrote: > > > Hi FLAC dev's list, > > > > I'm looking for a library for the C# language (Microsoft .Net > > Framework 2.0or higher) to play FLAC files and/or maybe do some > other > > things like getting > > the file duration, file properties, ... of FLAC files. >

> From: Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> > To: flac-dev at xiph.org > Cc: > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 5:39 AM > Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] pkg-config output and <FLAC/assert.h> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo > <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> FLAC helpfully provides a flac.pc file.

Hello, I've tried encoding a FLAC file from a WAVE file saved with 24-bits-per-sample, using the flac executable. I get this warning: WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample=24 The code is currently here on line 373: src/flac/encode.c where the comment says let these slide with a warning since they're unambiguous I do not really understand the warning

Hello I'm the developer of the newly released FM Composer, an open source music software featuring a tracker and an FM synthesizer : http://fmcomposer.org It's currently under GPL v3. I've added a FLAC export feature for the next version to be released, using libFLAC. I'm not really sure about what I can do, even after reading the copyright notice... - Should I use libFLAC as

I'll throw this thought out here so it doesn't get lost: when it came time for me to build a Windows release, I always used a quarantined Windows box that had the minimum stuff installed and had never been on a network, to avoid malware getting into the binaries. The last thing I ever wanted to hear was some Windows user blaming FLAC because a bad build infected him.? It was bad enough

Hi all, In my latest commit I have updated all version strings and copyright dates. I am now going to do a little testing (and encourage anyone else to do the same) and hopefully release in the next day or so. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

Josh Coalson wrote: > excellent, thanks for the tip. this solves the problem for > autoconf-based builds, but still not sure how to do it for MSVC. Sorry, whats the problem with MSVC? Erik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Microsoft's biggest weakness is