similar to: PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain"

2014 Nov 30
4
awk vs. mawk
On Nov 26 22:39:27, hans at stare.cz wrote: > ./test_replaygain.sh fails for me in tonegenerator(), saying: > > ./test_replaygain.sh[91]: mawk: not found > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... -: ERROR: got partial sample > > Apparently, the tone-generating awk script does not work with > my system's awk, which is "awk version 20110810" as distributed
2013 Apr 25
0
[PATCH] Add set -x to stop test_metaflac.sh
test_metaflac.sh wasn't aborting when replaygain values were incorrect because the die() function was embedded in a pipe. set -x was added so the script exits with a non-zero exit code when die is called in a pipe. --- test/test_metaflac.sh | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/test/test_metaflac.sh b/test/test_metaflac.sh index 9a13291..2ea2251 100755 ---
2012 Mar 13
2
PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain
Erik ? ? Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: syntax error near unexpected token `then' ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: `? then' Do both /bin/bash and /bin/dash give exactly the same error message ? Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew
2006 Aug 28
2
test_metaflac fails in make check for flac 1.1.2 after --add-padding is performed
doing "make check" on flac-1.1.2, I get a segmentation fault ././test_metaflac.sh: line 51: 17370 Segmentation fault flac $* when running this portion of the test/test_metaflac.sh script: (set -x && run_metaflac --preserve-modtime --add-padding=12345 $flacfile) check_exit check_flac <---------------- where the segfault happens All other tests in
2013 Apr 23
2
Tests not aborting when appropriate
Hi, I was running make fullcheck when I found something weird. After editing the *expect.meta files , make fullcheck ran all tests and said "All tests passed", but the output included this (this is the last tests from test_metaflac.sh) > [...] > test case60: --remove --block-type=PICTURE... OK > test case61: --import-picture-from... OK > test case62:
2006 Aug 29
0
test_metaflac fails in make check for flac 1.1.2 after --add-padding is performed
--- Tom Goetze <tgoetze@yahoo.com> wrote: > doing "make check" on flac-1.1.2, I get a segmentation fault > > ././test_metaflac.sh: line 51: 17370 Segmentation fault flac > $* > > when running this portion of the test/test_metaflac.sh script: > > (set -x && run_metaflac --preserve-modtime --add-padding=12345 > $flacfile) >
2012 Mar 11
0
PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain
Earl Chew wrote: > There is only one test to verify handling of harmonics of the filter table > sampling frequencies. Earl, I've had a couple of attempts to get this patch working, without luck. With this patch applied, when i run the test_metaflac.sh script, I get: Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: syntax error near unexpected token
2012 Mar 12
2
PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain
Erik, I'm using bash.? Before I alter the syntax, what shell are you using ? Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:16:11 AM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote: > There is
2013 Apr 21
0
[PATCH] Reduce valgrind num-callers to 50
My Valgrind doesn't run, saying it doesn't support showing more than 50 entries of a stack trace --- test/test_bins.sh | 4 ++-- test/test_flac.sh | 8 ++++---- test/test_grabbag.sh | 8 ++++---- test/test_libFLAC++.sh | 2 +- test/test_libFLAC.sh | 2 +- test/test_metaflac.sh | 12 ++++++------ test/test_seeking.sh | 12 ++++++------
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] FLAC 1.0.4 build issue
Hi, I gave up on 1.0.4 on my osx machine for the time being, but needed it on a linux machine this morning. Grabbed 1.0.4 and it seemed to build ok, but doesn't pass make check. Sorry if this is redudant information. I've seen a few posts recently and can't tell if it is or not. flac-1.0.3 on the same machine builds, checks and runs fine. thanks, mike ERROR: iterator claims
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] osx 1.0.4
On 10/18/2002 7:29 PM, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Wagner One <wagner@wagnerone.com> wrote: >> On 10/18/2002 12:50 PM, Josh Coalson wrote: >> >>>> i configured and built 1.0.4 in osx 10.2. seemed to build fine, but each >>>> time i attemped to use the newly compiled flac binary I received this error >>>> >>>> "bus
2004 Sep 10
4
[Flac-users] FLAC 1.0.4 problems
I'm having a number of problems related to building the latest FLAC release. My build environment: Linux, PPC, gcc 2.95.3 The first has to do with with builing FLAC itself... specifically I can't get id3lib support to build. Whether or not I specify the location of the headers and libraries, the config.log turns up this: configure:9361: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -INONE/include
2006 Sep 07
1
test_metaflac fails in make check for flac 1.1.2 after --add-padding is performed
Josh, I applied this patch and all the "make check" tests passed (but I do not have valgrind and I did not use --enable-exhaustive-tests during configure, so it isn't all the tests). Do you see anything suspicious about it? --- flac-1.1.2.oldBuild/src/flac/decode.c 2005-01-24 20:13:46.000000000 -0800 +++ flac-1.1.2/src/flac/decode.c 2006-09-06 23:36:26.000000000 -0700
2012 Mar 18
2
PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain
Erik, I cannot reproduce the problem you see with either dash(1) or bash(1). > test case62: --import-picture-from... OK > Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 11025 (11025 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 11025 (11025 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 12000 (12000 x 1) ... OK >
2014 Dec 03
0
awk vs. mawk
On Nov 30 14:33:47, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 26 22:39:27, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > ./test_replaygain.sh fails for me in tonegenerator(), saying: > > > > ./test_replaygain.sh[91]: mawk: not found > > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... -: ERROR: got partial sample > > > > Apparently, the tone-generating awk script does not work with >
2012 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 3/3] export MALLOC_PERTURB_ and MALLOC_CHECK_ in test suite
That enables an special implementation that checks for common memory errors and will save us from a lot pain. --- test/test_bins.sh | 2 ++ test/test_flac.sh | 2 ++ test/test_grabbag.sh | 2 ++ test/test_libFLAC++.sh | 2 ++ test/test_libFLAC.sh | 3 +++ test/test_metaflac.sh | 2 ++ test/test_seeking.sh | 2 ++ test/test_streams.sh | 2 ++ 8 files
2014 Dec 10
1
awk vs. mawk
(ping, if there is any interest). On Dec 03 13:21:16, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 30 14:33:47, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > On Nov 26 22:39:27, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > > ./test_replaygain.sh fails for me in tonegenerator(), saying: > > > > > > ./test_replaygain.sh[91]: mawk: not found > > > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... -: ERROR:
2014 Dec 11
2
awk vs. mawk
On Dec 10 23:04:44, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote: > Definitely interested in a cross platform solution to this. Diff below. Please test. On Dec 03 13:21:16, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 30 14:33:47, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > On Nov 26 22:39:27, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > > ./test_replaygain.sh fails for me in tonegenerator(), saying: > > > > > >
2012 Feb 02
2
Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion
Erik, I'll resync and have another look. Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 10:30:21 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion Earl Chew wrote: > When reading the INDEX
2012 Feb 14
3
Regain play analysis patches
Earl Chew wrote: > One per filter table entry. That's 12 files right now. Thats probably a bit much. > The files could be generated on the fly, but that would either require > another program or script (eg Perl), Anything but Perl. I can write Perl but I can't read it :-). > or a dependence on an external toolkit such as sox. I'd be ok with requiring sox to run the