similar to: mid-side coding and bits per sample

Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <Tor-Einar_Jarnbjo@grosch- link.de>: >According to the format description, the coding method has to be 0. > >I've been using libFLAC 1.0.4 to encode the stream. I've checked my interpretation against "flac -a" and it seems to read 17 bits for each warmup sample. Here is its output: frame=168 blocksize=4608

Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix. inf.upol.cz>: >If input is 16 bit, side channel will be 17 bit (16bit - 16bit is >17bit number). And warmup samples will be (17 - wasted_bits) bit. Voila, this was the source of all my frustration, sync problems and who knows what. My decoder now works correctly for files encoded with the default settings. Are

I'm using libFLACC++ and libFLAC and I think that I'm using the calls in the typical order (see code below). But every monoe or stereo file that I send thru I get files that are the same sze as the orginal wave files. Doing a flac -a on the flac files I see that I get: frame=9 blocksize=4608 sample_rate=8000 channels=1 channel_assignment=INDEPENDENT subframe=0

> > I also had this verify error encoding a wav I ripped from a CD. I > didn't > > report this as it happended on flac running on debian linux > -current unstable. > > This error happened only with one track of a CD I was ripping. > > > > Another reason for me not reporting this was, that flac 1.0 running > on OpenBSD > > 2.9 encoded the wav with

Hi everybody, I need like to port the flac encoding and decoding algorithm on the VisualDSP platform. Do you know if it's already existing a flac version for that? I'm trying to estimate the computational cost of FLAClib on blackfin. Do you know some profiling information for blackfin? I saw the assembler code for CPU dependent optimiziations. Is there something similar for blackfin? I

I successfully compiled 1.3.0pre4 on MacOS X 10.8 and the tests succeeded. My configuration is Configuration summary : FLAC version : ........................ 1.3.0pre4 Host CPU : ............................ x86_64 Host Vendor : ......................... apple Host OS : ............................. darwin12.3.0 Compiler is GCC : ..................... yes GCC

On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 02:30:56PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > There have been reports of -9 using huge amounts of memory. -9 is really > theoretical, but people always seem to want to try the max setting. Anyway, > that's not an excuse but figuring out why -9 is using so much memory is lower > on my list than other stuff. -8 should get within 0.01% of -9 and is pretty >

--- Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <Tor-Einar_Jarnbjo@grosch-link.de> wrote: > Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix. > inf.upol.cz>: > > >If input is 16 bit, side channel will be 17 bit (16bit - 16bit is > >17bit number). And warmup samples will be (17 - wasted_bits) bit. > > Voila, this was the source of all my frustration, sync problems

hello, I am now develloping an embeded decoding system for flac.I have a problem about the format of the rice coding: the residual begins with : 01 01 08 0C the first two bytes are the warmups, the prediction order is 2. and the 080C is the following: 00 0010 0000 001100 the first two bits mean: residual coding method is partitioned rice the following four bits mean: the partition order is 2 ;

--- CHI Hongliang <hongliang.chi@enst-bretagne.fr> wrote: > hello, > > I am now develloping an embeded decoding system for flac.I have a > problem about the format of the rice coding: > > the residual begins with : 01 01 08 0C > > the first two bytes are the warmups, the prediction order is 2. and > the 080C is the following: > 00 0010 0000 001100 > >

looks fine, I would suspect how the PCM sample are formatted and sent to process(), could you show that part of the code? Josh --- James Smith <jsmith@landmarkdigital.com> wrote: > > I'm using libFLACC++ and libFLAC and I think that I'm using the calls > in the > typical order (see code below). But every monoe or stereo file that > I send > thru I get files

----- Forwarded message from Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com> ----- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:19:41 -0700 From: Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com> Resent-From: Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com> To: submit@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#274301: libflac4 segfaults on corrupt flac files Severity: normal Package: libflac4 Version: 1.1.0-11 Running ogg123 on

Hi all, I have tagged 1.3.0pre4 in git and provided a tarball here: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/flac-1.3.0pre4.tar.xz I have built and tested the git tree on: linux-x86_64 openbsd5-i386 freebsd5-i386 as well as successfully cross compiling from Linux to 32 and 64 bit MinGW. As far as I am concerned, the only thing left to do for this release is to update the

Here's how I set up the data for processing: // For moving data into 32 bit shape uint8_t *buffer8 = NULL; uint16_t *buffer16 = NULL; uint32_t *buffer32 = NULL; unsigned sample32; unsigned sample, channel; uint32_t bitsPerSample = this->get_bits_per_sample(); numFrames = inData.GetSize();

--- configure.ac | 7 +++++ src/libFLAC/bitreader.c | 12 ++------- src/libFLAC/bitwriter.c | 8 ++---- src/libFLAC/fixed.c | 18 +++++-------- src/libFLAC/format.c | 8 ++---- src/libFLAC/include/private/macros.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++ src/libFLAC/metadata_iterators.c | 17 +++---------