similar to: MD5 Signature Mismatch

--- Brian Willoughby <brianw at sounds.wa.com> wrote: There are no uncompressed files here, so it's difficult to discover what you need to know. --- end of quote --- I've asked him for the uncompressed first track to see what the correct md5 should be --- Brian Willoughby <brianw at sounds.wa.com> wrote: This could be an uploading problem. There are still too many

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/25, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi > > > > I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode > it to > > WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch > > So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message > above > >

Hi I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode it to WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message above still decodable to WAV (and how can you do this, because flac.exe doesn't want to decode the file), even if there is a MD5 signature mismatch, or is this not possible at all? thx

--- Brian Willoughby <brianw at sounds.wa.com> wrote: My suggestion is to first gather more information, by learning how to confirm whether an MD5 Signature even exists in these files before continuing to determine the reason for the mismatch. Maybe someone else has more information. --- end of quote --- Thanks for the response. He sent me a link to the files here:

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/25, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > > > --- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2007/7/25, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to > decode

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/7/27, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > > > > > > But how is it possible then the FLAC encoder allows files which > have > > > a bad > > > resulting MD5 to be encoded? Is it because of the bad ram, ... > this > > > incorrect MD5 is not detected during encoding? > > >

2007/7/25, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > --- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2007/7/25, Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode > > it to > > > WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch >

Hello, I'm on a Mac and I'm noticing that encoding via the flac command line is significantly slower with version 1.3.0 than 1.2.1. I'm encoding a 24/96 file to flac, both from wav and aiff and both formats are showing the same speed decrease when using 1.3.0. Also, 1.2.1 will not encode an aiff-c file, but 1.3.0 will. Is this change documented anywhere? Thanks, Scott --------------

Are you sure they didn't change the default encoding level ? I would include some example timings to give a better idea of what "significantly slower" is Wonder if you see same for 44/16 files? > On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:29 AM, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > You might want to report this to the flac-dev mailinglist instead of the

So, let's provide some information then :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- soa2ii at thor /mnt/files/music/Slime/Alle gegen Alle $ flac -aF 02\ St?rtebecker.flac flac 1.2.1, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007 Josh Coalson flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome

hi, according to the FAQ flac supports multichannel formats. i had no luck with 1.1.4 though ( "Untitled.aif: ERROR: unsupported number channels 8 for AIFF" ), i guess that feature was added in 1.2? unfortunately, the binary for 1.2 does not run on OS X 10.4 (says libiconv is too old). i removed libiconv and reinstalled that from source, but then flac 1.2.1 just prints

Hello, I'm on a Mac and I'm noticing that encoding via the flac command line is significantly slower with version 1.3.0 than 1.2.1. I'm encoding a 24/96 file to flac, both from wav and aiff and both formats are showing the same speed decrease when using 1.3.0. To give an idea of the speed decrease, encoding at flac level 8: 24/96 wav file 1.21: 61.05 seconds. ratio=0.690 1.3: 222.48

Hej, well I'm not sure because those file that are corrupt have been around for a quite long time. It could have been k3b but I'm really not sure. Right now I was ripping with Audex and tagging with Audex/Amarok/kid3. Those files seem to be fine though. My lates approaches have been with Picard/beets :-) I think it's not possible to share those files without getting in legal

This is a follow-on to the "SQL field format for digest-md5?" thread. After some additional debugging, I've found the problem is a mismatch in what Dovecot expects and Postfix uses for the user and realm. For a username "user at example.com" and password "sekret", Dovecot expects: username = "user" realm = "example.com" but Postfix sends

I am trying to install Ruby-1.8.7p302 on a CentOS-5.5 server in preparation for a Rails-3 application deployment. I have downloaded the source from Rubyforge.org, unpacked it, and ran ./config and make. Everything built without error. I then ran checkinstall to create an rpm package. That too completed without error. However, when I try to install the resulting package using: yum localinstall

Hello, The attached patch fixes a typo in md5.c, where a memset is used to clear the digest, but only ends up clearing parts of it due to a missing dereference operator. Would it be possible to get this applied? It is not fixing a serious bug, but this warning comes up in the Chromium build, and fixing it would make the build one bit less noisy. Thanks, Hans -------------- next part

Hello all, I recently upgraded the libFLAC used in my application Max (http:// sbooth.org/Max/) to 1.1.3 and added preliminary support for album art. During the upgrade I evidently made some coding mistakes with interesting results. I've combed everything over and can't quite see the problems. I've become somewhat frustrated because my code didn't really change

Please cc: the results from dev list back here though I would run some tests on a diff platform but don't have access to my PC for a few weeks Would also be interesting to see what decoding stats you get > On Jul 25, 2014, at 7:38 AM, Scott Brown <scottcbrown at gmail.com> wrote: > > I will post to the dev list, sorry about that. > > To give an idea, though, at flac

yes that is what i did. got the "requires version 7.0.0 or later, but libiconv.2.dylib provides version XYZ" (forgot which version i had before). removed libiconv, downloaded compiled and installed the new one (libiconv-1.13.1), then i just get $ flac Bus error i reinstalled flac 1.1.4, still runs fine (but doesn't support multichannel). cheers, -sciss- Am 05.08.2009 um

I can't figure out how to verify flac md5 signatures. The docs say flac does an md5 over the unencoded audio data, but I can't reproduce it. I'm using flac 1.0.2 and Ron Rivest's reference md5 implementation. $ md5 temp.wav MD5 (temp.wav) = a7c92c4a656b2be2582f77c51b68a623 $ flac temp.wav $ metaflac temp.flac file: temp.flac METADATA block #0 ... MD5 signature: