similar to: IPSEC-Netfilter patch for 2.6.10

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "IPSEC-Netfilter patch for 2.6.10"

2004 Dec 14
4
ipsec-netfilter patches for 2.6.9
The patches may be found at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/contrib/IPSEC ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/contrib/IPSEC I found these patches on the netfilter-devel list and make no warranties as to how well they work (or not). -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP
2004 Sep 23
0
Fwd: RE: 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall
FYI... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44 From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca> To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net> I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I noticed I completely forgot
2004 Oct 06
1
Re: VPN/ipsec naming of interfaces
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 claas@rootdir.de wrote: > Hello! > > > Machine A > WAN IP: 123.123.123.111 > LAN IP: 192.168.177.1 > > > Machine A wants to connect through an IPsec tunnel to 192.168.176.2 tcp 110 (pop3). > > kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT: > IN= OUT=ppp0 SRC=123.123.123.111 DST=192.168.176.2 > LEN=60 TOS=0x10
2004 Oct 01
4
Re: Error: Your kernel and/or iptables does not not support policy match: ipsec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 claas@rootdir.de wrote: > Hello, > > > I am trying to get ipsec with kernel 2.6.8.1 and shorewall 2.1.9 running, > but I still have a problem: > > Validating hosts file... > Error: Your kernel and/or iptables does not not support policy match: ipsec > > I had a look for netfilter patch-o-matic, but I did not find the
2004 Nov 02
0
Shorewall 2.2.0 Beta 2
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The
2004 Nov 02
3
Shorewall 2.2.0 Beta 2
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The
2004 Dec 18
0
IPSEC-2.6 Roadwarrior
I''ve successfully tested an IPSEC Roadwarrior configuration where both the gateway and the roadwarrior are runniing 2.6 with Racoon. The Shorewall IPSEC-2.6 documentation (http://shorewall.net/IPSEC.htm) has been updated to reflect my experimentation. Note that you can get the new ''ipsecvpn'' script from CVS until I release RC1 in the next day or so. -Tom -- Tom
2004 Jan 27
0
IPSEC and the 2.6 Kernels
I am engaged in a discussion on the Netfilter development list about Netfilter and IPSEC in the 2.6 kernels. There is uniform agreement that the current implementation is unacceptable and a design for an improved facility is emerging. Until that design is implemented and available, I will not be doing anything more in Shorewall to accommodate the current implementation. -Tom -- Tom Eastep
2004 Oct 08
2
ipsec policy problem
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 claas@rootdir.de wrote: > Hello, > > > > #--- file: policy --- > #vpn policies: > loc vpn ACCEPT info > fw vpn ACCEPT info > vpn loc ACCEPT info > vpn fw ACCEPT info > > net
2004 Oct 04
0
2.6 Kernel and Native IPSEC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As I announced earlier, I''m on vacation this week and we are spending the week at our second home. Before I left, I simulated an IPSEC tunnel between this house and our home in the Seattle area and I''m pleased to announce that the real tunnel works flawlessly. So I believe that I have done all of the testing that I can on the new
2004 Dec 19
6
IPSEC vs OpenVPN
While I have concentrated on support for 2.6 native IPSEC in release 2.2.0, I am still of the opinion that unless you absolutely need IPSEC compatibility that OpenVPN is a much easier (and in the case of roadwarriors, a much better) solution. Having already generated all of the required X.509 certificates, it took me less than 1/2 hr to replace my IPSEC testbed with an OpenVPN one using the new
2004 Aug 16
2
Re: [Shorewall-announce] Shorewall 2.1.4
Magnus Hyllander wrote: > > I guess what I''m wondering is, how does Shorewall (netfilter) know which > zone a certain road warrior belongs to? I''ve just completed getting dynamic zones working with ipsec again. A dynamic IPSEC zone is defined in /etc/shorewall/zones by following the short name (first column) with ":ipsec". The code is in CVS. There are a
2004 Oct 14
2
ipsec - report of success
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 claas@rootdir.de wrote: > I am using kernel 2.6.6 native ipsec with racoon and shorewall 2.1.9 > in production for one week now. I just want to tell you that it seems > to run stable here. > > I am going to extend my setup to a 3 gateway setup soon. > Afterwards I will try to also get roadwarriors in. > I will report on that
2004 Aug 14
0
Bug: New IPSEC support in 2.1.3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have been testing the new IPSEC 2.6 kernel support this morning using transport mode over a wireless link. I have discovered one bug which is corrected in the file at: ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.1.3/firewall - -Tom - -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
2005 Jan 04
0
Beware kernel 2.6.10
Unpatched 2.6.10 kernels are apparently broken WRT TCP connection tracking. Established connections that are ended with an RST are not removed from the conntrack table. See: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2005-January/017956.html -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \
2005 Feb 15
1
Re: Shorewall 2.2 and Debian Sarge
Jason Wohlford wrote: > > linux:/etc/shorewall# shorewall check > /sbin/shorewall: line 261: Added: command not found > Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions... > Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... > Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf... > /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 261: Added: command not found BTW -- it looks like you have a missing "#" on a
2004 Aug 07
1
Shorewall 2.1.3
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.1/shorewall-2.1.3 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.1/shorewall-2.1.3 This version includes my first cut at IPSEC support for 2.6 Kernels with the new policy match facility. That facility must be installed using patch-o-matic-ng as described on the Netfilter site. I''m anticipating that the facility will be part of standard kernels by the time
2005 Jun 28
2
[Fwd: Bridge + netfilter failing with recent Fedora 3 kernels.]
-- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
2005 Sep 20
0
Fwd: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet
FYI This bug will prevent ''shorewall restore'' from working if you have "!<single IP address>" in the ORIGINAL DEST column. -Tom ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet Date: Wednesday 14 September 2005 15:09 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org The conntrack
2004 Dec 10
0
[Fwd: RE: Shorewall IPSEC]
Just to close this thread... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key