similar to: (Universal) Ambisonic implementation

Hi Josh, The minimum things that Flac would need to implement to satisfy the 'file implementations' part of the spec is a bit of metadata and the extensions to channel counts. ok, I do realise that the extending the maximum channel count may be difficult ... there's gotta be a way to do it though. Etienne On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com>

--- On Thu, 9/17/09, e deleflie <edeleflie at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Flac Developers, > > My name is Etienne Deleflie, I'm the founder of > http://www.ambisonia.com and, more recently, http://soundofspace.com. > > Myself and the community I serve are looking for a lossless file > format that can encapsulate ambisonic encoding. To this end a > specification has

e deleflie <edeleflie at gmail.com> ... > ok, I do realise that the extending the maximum channel count may be > difficult ... there's gotta be a way to do it though. Perhaps a comparison of the FLAC structure with that of Vorbis will help. Within a FLAC stream the audio is split into blocks which are grouped (interleaved). But within each block the eight channels are chained

All, Progress has been made on the proposed draft spec for integrating ambisonics into vorbis. We are not yet finished (should be soon), but you can see the progress here: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=df4dtw69_3626qqq6st The issue we have hit now concerns how/who would implement the encoding and decoding in Vorbis Tools. Because ambisonics uses spherical harmonic components, an ambisonic file

2008/9/25 e deleflie <edeleflie at gmail.com>: > Hi Vorbis-dev, > Hi, > I've been on this list for a couple of weeks, but its been quiet, so I > dont know who is who. > > My name is Etienne Deleflie, I am the creator of www.ambisonia.com, > and I am (together with the Ambisonic community) looking for a > 'delivery format' for Ambisonic data. > >

On 2/28/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/28/07, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote: > > Well, there are todo pages at wiki.xiph.org, but I meant more in the > > community folklore sense. My point is a roadmap doesn't help much unless > > there are people committed to making things happen. That's been the > > problem with a

On 2/28/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/28/07, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote: > > Well, there are todo pages at wiki.xiph.org, but I meant more in the > > community folklore sense. My point is a roadmap doesn't help much unless > > there are people committed to making things happen. That's been the > > problem with a

Tim, Would you mind giving me a more specific example of the sort of document that you think this should look like? I'd like to write up something that is somewhat final. On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Michael Graczyk <mgraczyk at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry > <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > > As a general point,

Where can I find the Header file or whatever which specifies the "Mapping" flag. In feb - apr 2007, there was a lot of discussion about Ambisonics and Monty kindly stated that Mapping = 1 ; Denotes and Ambisonic file as opposed to = 0 which is 1 speaker/ 1 channel Has this been written explicitly into the standard? Which standard should I be looking at?

Hello Tim and others, Thanks for your help explaining this process on IRC. I wrote out a first draft in the RFC xml format. I have attached the xml (labeled as xml.txt so it will appear inline) and the rendered txt files. Please let me know where I can make improvements. I will upload this draft to the IETF datatracker and send it out to codec@ after addressing your comments. -------------- next

On Oct 4, 2009, at 16:48, James Cloos wrote: > I always thought that the best way to put ambisonic media in flac > was to > use an ogg container, with the 0-order w channel in one flac > stream, the > three first-order channels in a second flac stream, the five second- > order > channels in a third flac stream and the seven third-order channels > in a > forth flac

All, Lets say I have a 16 channel file, but 10 of those channels are empty (all values are 0). For a) the vorbis codec and also b) the FLAC codec ... would the size of the file be close to (or practically the same as) the size of a 6 channel file? Etienne

Hi all, My apologies for the confusion ... but I am re-naming this thread again because the proposal doesn't come from Ambisonia. As the founder of Ambisonia I have only been 'mediating' between some members of the ambisonic community ... so it would be wrong to associate the spec with Ambisonia. To clarify. This is what the spec proposes: - that Mapping = 1 means the contents are

"Gabriel I." wrote: > Greetings, > > I apologize if I posted this in the wrong list, I wasn't sure where to post > it, but seeing as the tags are called "vorbis comments" I thought vorbis, > rather than ogg-dev, would be the right choice. (actually, I'm not even a > developer anyway) Hi Gabriel, I doubt whether the Xiph community would promote a

Not sure if this belongs here or in flac-dev. I am subscribed to both, so flop it over if fits better over there. Looking at the Changelog for FLAC 1.2.1 (17-Sep-2007), it says: "With the new --keep-foreign-metadata in flac, non-audio RIFF and AIFF chunks can be stored in FLAC files and recreated when decoding." Where can I find more detail on what is a

This patch adds top level functions to create an ambisonic multistream encoder. The implementation currently just calls the analogous surround sound functions with channel mapping 255 to create an encoder that bundles uncoupled streams. Forthcoming patches will actually set channel bitrate and other configuration. My main concern is that adding additional

Hi, I have posted this three times to the flac-dev, vorbis-dev, and ogg-dev mailing lists. I wanted to see what code there was currently to support Ambisonics. So I downloaded the code from the xiph download page for libogg-1.1.3, libvorbis-1.1.2, vorbis-tools-1.1.1 and flac-1.1.4, but wasn't able to find anything. If it exists then I missed it, so could somebody please point me to it.

The prospect of people actually putting B-format audio (via the panner or directly input) into Ogg/Vorbis brings an interesting challenge: What do we do with the audio after decoding it? The following sane options exist: A) Simply output the B-format audio B) Produce a downmix 1) Mono. 2) Stereo blumlein crossed pairs 3) Stereo UHJ 4) binaural C) Produce speaker feeds 1) Fully

On 19/04/16 12:17 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > We should probably start keeping track of the space of invalid TOC > sequences somewhere global so that people don't define conflicting > extensions. I started such a page at https://wiki.xiph.org/OpusExtensions -r -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

Here is the modified patch. I added a flag to configure.ac which is set to 0 to disable ambisonics, and 1 to enable it. Right now the implementation simply creates a surround encoder with N uncoupled streams. Thanks, Michael Graczyk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: