similar to: MinGW Patch

Hi, in include/share/alloc.h there is this section: #ifndef SIZE_MAX # ifndef SIZE_T_MAX # ifdef _MSC_VER # define SIZE_T_MAX SIZE_MAX # else # error # endif # endif # define SIZE_MAX SIZE_T_MAX #endif So, if we are on MSVC and have neither SIZE_MAX nor SIZE_T_MAX, we'll define SIZE_T_MAX to mean SIZE_MAX and SIZE_MAX to mean SIZE_T_MAX. I'm afraid this won't work ... It

Hi, I went in big trouble compiling Flac (Windows). With configure (msys and mingw32-make 4.5.2) I didn't have success to compile. Makefile.lite the same. I used also the patches for SIZE_T_MAX UINT_MAX . Then I could compile every (!) project in flac with MSVC 2008 and I got all libraries, *.dll and *.exe. The libraries are passing all test-programs. With my own tools I see the *.dlls

will surgent wrote: > Hello, I was trying to compile Flac on MinGW/Msys but got an error stating > SIZE_T_MAX is undefined. > To fix this error I edited the file "flac-1.2.1/include/share/alloc.h" and > made the following change: <snip> > #ifndef SIZE_MAX > # ifndef SIZE_T_MAX > # ifdef _MSC_VER > # define SIZE_T_MAX UINT_MAX > # elif

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS/Version|IRIX |All Platform|MIPS |All ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-09-05 14:23

I've been putting some work into building Libflac into a game engine I'm working on. I ran into a few small issues in the process, and was able to fix them, so I thought I'd post with my fixes. These aren't generally applicable - I'm taking a "shortest path to functionality" approach - but with a little work could probably be turned into general patches. First,

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > will surgent wrote: > > > Hello, I was trying to compile Flac on MinGW/Msys but got an error stating > > SIZE_T_MAX is undefined. > > To fix this error I edited the file "flac-1.2.1/include/share/alloc.h" and > > made the following change: Would it be possible to get this patch applied? I still hit this every time I try to

Not sure about any other version, but I know sol7 lacks SIZE_T_MAX which we are now using in -current. OpenBSD defines it as ULONG_MAX. Pawing through the Solaris /usr/include it stated it could be 'u_int' or 'u_long'. Depends on if your are compiling legacy stuff. I'm sure other OSes may encounter this issue (not tried Linux, but Redhat 7.x does not define it), but what

Hi all, The following patch fixes cross compiling from Linux to windows. The existing code was doing: #if !defined _MSC_VER && !defined __MINGW32__ && !defined __EMX__ #include <stdint.h> /* for SIZE_MAX in case limits.h didn't get it */ #endif when it seems to make much more sense to just test for the presence of <stdint.h> and do: #ifdef

Hello, I've used this command to analyse changes in brain volume: mod1<-aov(Volume~Sex*Lobe*Tissue+Error(Subject/(Lobe*Tissue)),data.vslt) I'm comparing males/females. For every subject I have 8 volume measurements (4 different brain lobes and 2 different tissues (grey/white matter)). As aov() provides only type I anovas, I would like to use lmer() with type II, however, I have

Hello, I'm using aov() to analyse changes in brain volume between males and females. For every subject (there are 331 in total) I have 8 volume measurements (4 different brain lobes and 2 different tissues (grey/white matter)). The data looks like this: Subject Sex Lobe Tissue Volume subect1 1 F g 262374 subect1 1 F w 173758 subect1 1 O g 67155 subect1 1 O w 30067 subect1 1 P g 117981

Hello, We use two different patches to build flac. The first one is a patch that detects correctly ranlib, ac, strip when you cross-compile. We especially use the patch when compiling for Windows under GNU/Linux. http://trac.videolan.org/vlc/browser/trunk/extras/contrib/src/Patches/flac-cross.patch The other one fixes an issue when compiling for Windows under Cygwin, that can't find

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458 ------- Additional Comments From us- at gmx.de 2002-12-19 03:16 ------- Sorry, typo: The irix version is 6.5.17 not 6.5.18 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

The attached patch is needed to make flac build on Solaris. Can some/all of these changes go upstream? Brian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: flac-01-forte.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 3186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20070124/c752fe5e/flac-01-forte-0001.bin

Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: > Surprisingly flac_mac had mistakenly gotten extra parameters for safe > string functions requiring further patching. > And here's patches for the changes in git for flactimer. Applied, thanks. > I noticed compat.h patch didn't make it into git. I know it may not be > perfect patch but unistd.h is in two different #ifdef checks. First one >

Hi, I obtain the following error messages when trying to compile flac 1.2.1 under MinGW : gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -DFLaC__INLINE=__inline__ -DNDEBUG -I../.. -I./include -I../../include -O3 -funroll-loops -finline-functions -Wall -W -Winl ine -g -O2 -MT stream_decoder.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/stream_decoder.Tpo -c stream_ decoder.c -DDLL_EXPORT -DPIC -o .libs/stream_decoder.o

If count > MAX_UINT-4 your loop loops indefinitely with an increment of 4, I think. On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Charith Mendis via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > So, I tried unrolling the following simple loop. > > int unroll(unsigned * a, unsigned * b, unsigned *c, unsigned count){ > > for(unsigned i=0; i<count; i++){ > > a[i] =

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458 Summary: sshd crashes with "fatal: mm_malloc: size too big" Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: MIPS OS/Version: IRIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

This change allows use of untrusted X11 forwarding (which is more secure) without requiring users to choose a finite timeout after which to refuse new connections. This matches the semantics of the X11 security extension itself, which also treat a validity timeout of 0 on an authentication cookie as indefinite. Signed-off-by: Trixie Able <table at inventati.org> --- clientloop.c | 12

ssh-keyscan may, under very specific circumstances, be vulnerable to something akin to a buffer overflow. It's probably impossible to exploit, though, if only because ssh-keyscan is not usually run on very large untrusted input files. ssh-keyscan uses an fgets() wrapper that uses an unsigned int to keep track of the length of a buffer holding the current line. On machines with sufficient

I did an audit for potential integer overflows of values which get passed to access_ok() and here are the results. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index dd3d6f7..c2aa12c 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num, struct