similar to: SPAM Filters rejecting list mail

By popular demand, I will NOT be posting email addresses on my web site. = You=20 will have to check http://www.shorwall.net/mailman/listinfo/<list name> t= o=20 see if delivery has been disabled. -Tom --=20 Tom Eastep \ A Firewall for Linux 2.4.* AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net

I have purchased a license for Vexira MailArmor (an antivirus product) and the good news is that it is installed and working at shorewall.net. The bad news is that I have yet to get Vexira running together with SpamAssassin :-( As things currently stand, list posts will be protected from viruses but may contain Spam. I''ll continue to work to correct this situation. -Tom -- Tom Eastep

We have dropped dovecot in place of UW-IMAP for about 40000 users and have solved our immediate problem: disk I/O overload, mainly from people doing POP3 and "leave mail on server". Thank you! Now i got loads of dovecot error messages in the logs and don't know if there is any significance. Here are a few examples: The most common event is: 2007-12-06 16:00:17.837654500 dovecot:

I have now configured Postfix to filter all email sent to shorewall.net with SpamAssassin. I have also configured GNU Mailman so that any list email that appears to be Spam will be held for my approval. Hopefully, this will prevent Spam from becoming a problem on our lists. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \

It appears that MailMan doesn''t propagate changes to the default spam filtration settings to existing mailing lists -- these only apply to new lists :-( Since I tested using a newly-created throw-away test list, spam filtering worked in my test but not on the Shorewall lists. I believe that I''ve correctly modified the lists to correctly divert Spam -- we''ll see.

The recipient has requested to have their mails scanned for Spam. Our UCE (Spam) detectors have been triggered by a message you sent: To: wildflower@greenapple.com Subject: Wildflower, &#288;&#279;&#355; ready for Romá&#328;&#263;&#279; in 15 míns - &#288;&#279;&#355; &#266;&#297;à&#314;&#297;&#349; softatábs at upto 80&#8453;

This is becoming a FAQ and should probably be added to the docs. Thanks, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:09:01 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: Carl Spelkens

---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] strange UDP scan results on a Shorewall=20 firewall Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:33:20 -0800 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: "Scott Duncan" <sduncan@cytechconsult.com> On Saturday 02 March 2002 04:30 am, Scott Duncan wrote: > Yes, the net->all policy is the same on all three (REJECT log

Hello, (my) doveadm is no longer working if I use the -S socket_path. # doveadm quota get -S mbx7:542 -u myaccount doveadm(myaccount): Error: doveadm server disconnected before handshake: EOF doveadm(myaccount): Error: mbx7:542: Command quota get failed for jobsanzl: EOF Quota name Type Value Limit % The server logs: Mar 22 00:29:47 doveadm(134.147.53.150):

Hello, after upgrading to 2.2.22 the lmtp service is crashing (segfault) a few times per hours. >From the logs: Mar 19 16:37:29 lmtp(redacted at ruhr-uni-bochum.de): Info: ohZXLe1x7VaUeQAAEc+Mrg: sieve: msgid=<redacted at async.facebook.com>: discarding vacation response to mailinglist recipient <redacted at facebookmail.com> Mar 19 16:37:29 lmtp(31124): Info: Disconnect from

Newbie question (just joined the list) Is anyone running Ruby on Rails in a teaching environment? Regards John John Colby BA, MBCS, PGCertE Lecturer, Department of Computing, The Business School Room F316, Galton Building, University of Central England, Franchise Street, Perry Barr, Birmingham B42 2SU Tel: +44 (0) 121 331 6937, Fax +44 (0) 121 331 6281, Mobile: 07795 215 912

This is just 1.3.5a + a) A fix that reenables hosts lists in /etc/shorewall/hosts. b) The ''firewall'' script now removes the lock file if it is killed by a signal. c) The new Quick Start Guides are included. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6067 Summary: IPv6 literal addresses broken Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: arekm@maven.pl QAContact:

Hi I’m currently trying to implement the Opus codec on a nRF 52 DK (from Nordic). One main goal of my project is a low power application that can record and send audio data (16+ kHz) over BLE. Therefore, the Opus audio codec would be suitable to encode audio data, send it over BLE and decode it on another chip. Unfortunately, I have some trouble implementing it. There are different parts to the

Looks about right. That said, you don't need 'client min protocol' on the DC. You need the client max protocol on the domain member and server min protocol on the DC to overlap. Andrew Bartlett On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 17:04 +0100, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Error verifying signature: parse error > --------------ms060308020506090108040201 > Content-Type: text/plain;

Broadcast and Network your R?sum? to thousands! This is a one time email. We will not send you any additional correspondence. Your email was attained from an online Resume Job Bank THAT WE SUBSCRIBE TO. If this is in error or you are no longer searching for the perfect job, we apologize and please disregard this email. Under Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th US Congress this letter

On Sep 19, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > Hi all, > building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT(Revision: 42128) with current llvm > (Revision: 42128) on 8.10.1 Darwin (x86) fails with the following > message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a > bug? I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly. >

Shorewall 1.3.9 is available. In this release: 1. DNS Names are now allowed in Shorewall config files (I still recommend against using them however). 2. The connection SOURCE may now be qualified by both interface and IP address in a Shorewall rule. 3. Shorewall startup is now disabled after initial installation until the file /etc/shorewall/startup_disabled is removed. 4. The

This is required in order to build using the built-in assembler in clang. --- I squashed the two changes since it would break the normal gcc build otherwise. --- celt/arm/arm2gnu.pl | 2 ++ celt/arm/celt_pitch_xcorr_arm.s | 18 +++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/celt/arm/arm2gnu.pl b/celt/arm/arm2gnu.pl index eab42ef..5c24758 100755 ---

It seems there is no way to correct te quota limit downward for some mailboxes, like: quota_rule9 = UCE-TMP:storage=-10%% The idea is to not eat up the users storage with spam, so that spam stays in the queue (for some time) while real mail gets delivered. There *is* a line } else if (*value != '-' && relative_rule) { in quota.c, but nothing else handles it,