similar to: Fixes to make flac build on Solaris

Hello, I was trying to compile Flac on MinGW/Msys but got an error stating SIZE_T_MAX is undefined. To fix this error I edited the file "flac-1.2.1/include/share/alloc.h" and made the following change: Starting at line #36 I changed: #ifndef SIZE_MAX # ifndef SIZE_T_MAX # ifdef _MSC_VER # define SIZE_T_MAX UINT_MAX # else # error # endif # endif # define SIZE_MAX SIZE_T_MAX

Ben Allison wrote: > There's a more few issues for compiling on MSVC. I put together a patch. > > Here's a quick rundown: > * must use __inline keyword with static inline functions (bitmath.h) If you include "share/compath.h" you will get a inline #defined as __inline when _MSC_VER is defined. I'd prefer a single diffinition of that in one place and one place

Hello, I've used this command to analyse changes in brain volume: mod1<-aov(Volume~Sex*Lobe*Tissue+Error(Subject/(Lobe*Tissue)),data.vslt) I'm comparing males/females. For every subject I have 8 volume measurements (4 different brain lobes and 2 different tissues (grey/white matter)). As aov() provides only type I anovas, I would like to use lmer() with type II, however, I have

Hello, I'm using aov() to analyse changes in brain volume between males and females. For every subject (there are 331 in total) I have 8 volume measurements (4 different brain lobes and 2 different tissues (grey/white matter)). The data looks like this: Subject Sex Lobe Tissue Volume subect1 1 F g 262374 subect1 1 F w 173758 subect1 1 O g 67155 subect1 1 O w 30067 subect1 1 P g 117981

Josh: > fixed, thanks! Thanks. However, I think there is a better patch to fix these problems. I reworked this patch not long ago to do better testing for what inline to use in configure, and also a better way to calculate the size of the #defines in replaygain_analysis.c. This was submitted to the SourceForge bug tracker as bug 1701960. See here, and note attached patch.

for recent code changes I find myself needing some workarounds for MSVC6: 1st, I need a fast way to swap bytes (for endianness) of a 32-bit int. I could not find a builtin like bswap; the closest thing I found was ntohl() which appears to be a function call and also requires linking with winsock2 (ws2_32.lib) to get it. 2nd, I need an equivalent for lround() (or round() is ok), which is not in

I'm attempting to use clang/llvm to compile some legacy C code, and am running into a strange issue. There are several functions in my codebase which make use of the __inline keyword, but do not include the customary static keyword along with it. When I compile these files, the generated code appears not to have any of the function definitions in it--just undefined references to external

Ben Allison wrote: > >> * change instances of uint32_t in bitwriter.c to FLAC__uint32 > > > > Can we include <inttypes.h> to fix this instead? > > Sadly there is no inttypes.h on MSVC. At least versions to Visual Studio > 2010. I presume this is why ordinal.h was created in the first place. I'm not sure how Josh came to do it that way. In general, I

Johnny Rosenberg wrote: > Maybe a stupid question, but I was born stupid and I have walked that > path ever since, so: Is there a changelog? The only changelog is the git changelog. I will be writing a real changelog to go in the actual release tarball before the official release. The git changelog is available here: https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=summary or in any git clone of

Hi all. I've recently uploaded a package (bnlearn) to CRAN. It builds fine on both Linux (32 and 64 bit) and Windows, but fails on MacOSX ix86 because of C90 vs C99 issues: http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-patched-macosx-ix86/bnlearn-00install.html Since I've no MacOSX machine at hand, I would like to ask you: why is C99 not the default for gcc on MacOSX ix86? Is it safe to

Test version 61 ./configure is failing on my OpenBSD 3.6-stable system. The following corrects the problem. Would it be possible to test for gnu99 option before using it in subsequent tests? --- configure.in.orig Fri Jan 14 14:04:10 2005 +++ configure.in Fri Jan 14 16:44:22 2005 @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ # say specifically that we want C99 features. # we can make use of

Hi all, I'm unable to compile R under an HPC system (which like many HPC systems doesn't always have the latest and greatest software). The version of GCC is 4.1.2 under CentOS 5.7. Running ./configure gives the following output: R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Source directory: . Installation directory: /home/tbarik C compiler: gcc

Hello > I know there are some weird semantics among different compilers with > the inline/__inline keywords in C when you don't pair them with > static, but I can't imagine that this is correct. Is there a bug > here, or am I missing something? Yes, clang is correct here, you're missing C99 inline semantics. You can either read C99 standard or

Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > There compilation on Solaris 10 Sparc with Sun Studio 12 gives the following compile errors: > > > CC bitreader.lo > > "bitreader.c", line 494: warning: implicit function declaration: MIN > > CC bitwriter.lo > > "bitwriter.c", line 273: reference to static identifier "bitwriter_grow_" in extern

Dear developeRs, As of icc 10, the -c99 option is deprecated, and generates a lot of warnings when compiling R or R packages. If you use CC="icc -std=c99" instead of just CC="icc", R's configure will not add the -c99 option, and the code seems to compile and run just fine. (Please don't hesitate to let me know if this is a bad idea. :-) -- Regards, Bj?rn-Helge

Hello! I try to maintain a couple off old Openwrt based routers. The routers run openwrt whiterussian, so it quite outdated. But it is a little dangerous to update a remote machine from whiterussian to kamikaze or backfire, this may be usefull for others. I used the openwrt whiterussian 0.9 sdk and the attached Makefile to compile all tinc versions till 1.0.11. Since 1.0.11 the compile process

On 24 Sep 2015, at 13:43, Marcin Miros?aw <marcin at mejor.pl> wrote: > > W dniu 23.09.2015 o 15:30, Timo Sirainen pisze: >> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.19.rc1.tar.gz >> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.19.rc1.tar.gz.sig >> >> A lot of changes since v2.2.18, so here's a release candidate first. If no bugs are reported,

Hi all, We've been running Dovecot since December '07 with with no glitches. It's a great solid piece of software, thanks so much Timo!! I thought I'd try out 1.1.1, so I brought it down and tried compiling it on AIX, using the IBM compiler, xlc. It's what I've used all along. The error I'm seeing on the make is: source='array.c'

# HG changeset patch # User john.levon@sun.com # Date 1161090606 25200 # Node ID c6bfe43048f3becda6966deceb7b70baea833b7c # Parent 03d4223c846b14fc415cfd05d970c7b4d688fddb Many of the tools use C99 features such as bool, or expect certain functions. Fix the CFLAGS to enable these on Solaris. Signed-off-by: John Levon <john.levon@sun.com> diff --git a/config/SunOS.mk b/config/SunOS.mk ---

extract below, this has already been reported a while back but still no new patch, so this email is to serve as a reminder, if someone manually fixes it for the ports tree, I dont consider that a fix, ideally we need this fixed in the source code, as not everyone will install it from ports. Chris "clang40 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-dns -I../../src/lib-test