similar to: whitelist

Dear Friend, I done configuration using RBLSMTPD with WHITELIST, but I don't know it is correct. Please check files below are corrects. Thanks Adriano === FILE WHITELIST.DOMINIO.RBL. ==== $ttl 900 whitelist.dominio.rbl. IN SOA host1.xxxxxx.com. root.xxxxx.com. ( 2006112002 ; serial; 3600 ; refresh period (1 hora); 900 ; retry time (15 minutos); 1800 ; expire tiem (30 minutos); 900 ;

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6: 1) Corrected problem in 1.4.6 where the MANGLE_ENABLED variable was being tested before it was set. 2) Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the tcrules file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables command.

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Instead of a blacklist, why not a whitelist? Given the size of LangRef, > you're bound to leave something out of your blacklist that needs to be > there (also, future additions to LLVM IR will need to be added to the > blacklist; are you sure you can catch *all* of them?). A whitelist seems >

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > >> Instead of a blacklist, why not a whitelist? Given the size of LangRef, >> you're bound to leave something out of your blacklist that needs to be >> there (also, future additions to

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6: 1) Corrected problem in 1.4.6 where the MANGLE_ENABLED variable was being tested before it was set. 2) Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the tcrules file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables command. 3)

Hi, The dovecot version is 2.2.33.2 and we are using LDAP to do the authentication for SMTP service. We have the following configuration in auth-ldap.conf.ext to deny some users for LDAP auth. passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/deny.smtp driver = passwd-file deny = yes } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf driver = ldap } And now we want to change the mechanism and only users

Hello, When new users are added we start them with a spam rule that routes spam to their junk folder. I don't see a way to assign priority ... so how does a user whitelist a spam-flagged email? Are the rules applied in some order? Alphabetically perhaps? If so I can name the spam rule z-spam. Thanks in advance.

Instead of a blacklist, why not a whitelist? Given the size of LangRef, you're bound to leave something out of your blacklist that needs to be there (also, future additions to LLVM IR will need to be added to the blacklist; are you sure you can catch *all* of them?). A whitelist seems much less prone to breakage or unexpected behavior. -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An

Thanks. That's exactly what I needed. However I have a permission problem. I added the parameter to 90-sieve.conf and created the directory but now I get the following permissions errors in maillog even though I have the file and directory wide open with 777 permissions: Error: yY/0JHtauVQfPgAAU+Cu/Q: sieve: failed to open sieve dir: stat(/var/lib/dovecot/sieve/after.d/) failed: Permission

We used to have a per device feature whitelist to filter out the unsupported virtio features. But this seems unnecessary since: - the main idea behind feature whitelist is to block control vq feature until we finalize the control virtqueue API. But the current vhost-vDPA uAPI is sufficient to support control virtqueue. For device that has hardware control virtqueue, the vDPA device driver

What is the best way to manage multiple stanza within a config file? For a splunk configuration file (inputs.conf) I need to manage some thing like [monitor://var/log] blacklist = someRegularExpression whitelist = someOtherRegularExpression [monitor://var/lib/ourApp] There can be multiple monitor stanzas and each may or may not have a whitelist or blacklist. I haven''t found any

I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently working on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it uses inline JavaScript in a few places so CSP breaks it) but - Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? I know there are some wacky characters that are legal in e-mail addresses but are

On 19.10.2016 17:03, Karol Herbst wrote: > You don't get why I try to say. We have to actually find out when to > apply this workaround, not to create some silly whitelist/blacklist. > It's the last option, we never want to actually use. > Well if you do not say, who can understand!? :) Besides, you can mock with "silly" whitelist/blacklist", however there is

This adds support for whitelisting the acceptable options in the "refuse options" setting in rsyncd.conf. It introduces "!" as a special option string that refuses most options and interprets any following strings as patterns of options to allow. For example, to allow only verbose and archive: refuse options = ! verbose archive The "!" does't refuse no-iconv,

Just a note to mention that I have been using the RC1 release at work for a simple one interface firewall. No problems that I have seen. We use Solaris, AIX, Tru64, and Linux in my group at the U of W. I know some IP filter package is available on Solaris and Tru64. On the Tru64 system you can configure an interface with a list of cidr notation subnets to accept or deny access. I reformatted

I think we should add an FAQ entry for tcp_ecn. I remember Tom giving a good description in one of his many responses and there is mention of it in the pptp page, but I could not find the response from Tom about different tcp stacks. Thanks, -- Steve Herber herber@thing.com work: 206-261-0307 Systems Engineer, AMCIS, UoW home: 425-454-2399 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat,

On 09/15/2018 10:41 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Point of sending the success ones is to maintain whitelist as well as > blacklist so you know which ones you should not tarpit anymore. We > know it does scale as we have very large deployments using the whole > three request per login model. > > "Success" in a proxy which is not it self authenticating is only whether it know

On Nov 9, 2018, at 9:22 AM, Vic Chester <vcsubscriptions at gmail.com> wrote: > > https://protonmail.com/ Aside from semi-charitable organizations like that, I wouldn?t expect good free email service to exist. It?s seriously complicated to run a properly-configured email server. The last time I looked into it, there were something like 24 separate RFCs an SMTP-only server had to

Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > I have an entire /8 blacklisted. The problem is there is a single IP in > it I want to exempt from this. Searching the web site, I note there > used to be (circa version 1.3) a whitelist feature, but I couldn''t find > a simple solution to what I want to do. > > What would be the bes/easiest way to accomplish this? I can''t think of a

Hi, I am trying to use shorewall as a way for authenticated network access. I read about dynamic black lists, but is there a way to do dynamic white lists? I''ve looked through the doc, but couldn''t find it. Also, could someone please assist me on creating a rule so that all other failures (ie. the mac is not in the whitelist), requests get forwarded to a certain ip and port (so