similar to: DSG - Research List Archives?

At Tom Eastep''s request, an informal Shorewall Documentation Support = Group (DSG) is hoping to relieve some of the writing and editing burdens = that come with maintaining and improving the Shorewall documentation. = The DSG welcomes and needs your suggestions and contributions about all = aspects of the documentation, including structure, content, references, = style, grammar --

IMHO, our big picture challenge is that multiple explanations for several topics are spread out over several different docs and pages One parameter is frequently discussed in four or more places (QSG, files reference pages, file comments, main documentation, etc.) That gives multiple perspectives, which can be good, but can also lead to at least the appearance, especially to a beginner, of

Attached is file "QSG-issues-1.0.txt" containing a numbered and commented list of issues collected from contributors and recent lists activity. It might be cool to have these issues in some spiffy issue tracking system like RT or something, but for a low tech start it''ll probably suffice. COMMENTS - IMHO (no particular order): I have searched the archives for additional

LLVM, What do I pass into the DSG in order to access the globals vector of functions that a function pointer may be calling. The code: CallInst *calli = dynamic_cast<CallInst*>(*i); std::vector<GlobalValue*> funcVect = theGraph.getNodeForValue(calli->getCalledFunction()).getNode()->getGlobals(); Doesn't appear to work... getCalledFunction() returns 0 Dave On Fri, 6 Dec

Hello, Is it possible to display the data structure graphs created by the Data Structure Analysis using a visualization tool? Thanks --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, xavier wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to display the data structure graphs created by the Data Structure Analysis using a visualization tool? yes. Just run one of these commands: analyze -datastructure x.bc -- local DSGs analyze -budatastructure x.bc -- BU DSGs analyze -tddatastructure x.bc -- TD DSGs These commands will output one

On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Ron Shannon wrote: > > I am ready to begin the documentation changes for 1.3.2. Are > > you close to > > having any of your changes ready for release? If so, we can > > get those into > > CVS before I begin my changes -- if not, then I''ll go ahead > > and update CVS > > with the 1.3.2 material. > > > >

On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Ron Shannon wrote: > All points agreed. > > As you suggest, the docs are better if they''re a well-integrated set. If > a choice is made to exclude an advanced subject or level of detail from > the QSG, they should be covered elsewhere. As noted before, the docs as > a whole are exceptionally good. Your extra effort on the docs certainly > shows

I just installed Shorewall for the first time and had no working knowledge of iptables other than a couple magazine articles prior to this time. The use of the QSG is fresh in my mind. It was the single most helpful guide of any on the site. Comments: 1) The /etc/shorewall/masq section shows the use of the third column but then says you don''t need it if you have a dynamic ip. Its

On 17/10/2018 20:03, Warren Young wrote: > On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: >> launchd is not being forced on them as systemd is in practice > Try doing without launchd on macOS. > > If you think that?s irrelevant, count the number of MacBooks at the next FreeBSD conference you attend. That's Mac. It's not Linux. And

Dear list, this is perhaps more of a statistics question than an R question, but perhaps someone could help me out anyway. I'm doing sociological research and am currently in the process of familiarizing myself with the basic concepts of multiple imputation. Eventually, my goal is to perform quantile regression on a large data set, where one non-negative discrete variable contains missing

On 27 February 2015 at 21:26, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote: > Which brings us to my fallback proposal: what about disabling the > pass on darwin only? That's a decision for Jim/Evan. I'm ok if they are. > As for other targets, as a first step, making the pass run under -O3 > rather than -O1 is hopefully agreeable to everyone? Sounds reasonable.

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:51:39 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 02:28:08PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:44:44 +0300 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > set FEATURES_OK as per virtio 1.0 spec > > > > > > Signed-off-by:

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 02:28:08PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:44:44 +0300 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > set FEATURES_OK as per virtio 1.0 spec > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > --- > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 2 ++ > >

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 02:28:08PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:44:44 +0300 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > set FEATURES_OK as per virtio 1.0 spec > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > --- > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 2 ++ > >

As one of those who volunteered to help on this, I apologize to you and = the rest for being slow. Ironically, as this message arrives, I am in = the process of loading 1.3.1 and recording my edit ideas for the QSG = step-by-step... so there may be hope yet. I hope to have the compilation of recent suggestions done by Wednesday. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Eastep

Hi, I have installed XenDesktop5.5 (express) and followed your XenDesktop 5 - QSG.pdf guide and I having this problem after a successful installation: "Object reference not set to an instance of an object." pop up when do quick deploy.  See attached xendesktop-error.jpg I am running XCP1.1 rc-base-50674 which is equivalent to XenServer 5.6 SP2. XenDesktop is running in a Windows 2008

I'm new to R and am trying to extract the factors of a dataframe using numeric indices (e.g. df[1]) that are input to a function definition instead of the other types of references (e.g. df$out). df[1] is a list(?) whose class is "dataframe". These indexed lists can be printed successfuly but are not agreeable to the plot() and lm() functions shown below as are their df$out

Hello, I am implementing a code transformation that would heavily benefit from the CodeGen/StrongPHIElimination pass, but on the two bytecode files I've tested it on so far llc segfaults on both. I see there have been no substantive changes to this code since the middle of last year. Could someone please tell me what the status of this pass is? Thank you. Marc -------------- next part

[CCing the list] On Feb 12, 2008 1:51 AM, Dan Moniz <dnm at pobox.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > Kenneth Hoste suggested I get in touch with you as lead wrangler on > scheduling the 2008 LLVM DevMeet. I can't speak for others, but I know > I'm pretty packed with travel in August already, only some of which is > going to be directly sponsored or endorsed by work.